Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Photography
  3. Mobile
  4. News

Taking selfies with seals really isn’t a good idea, wildlife officials warn

Add as a preferred source on Google

Seal pups. Awww, they look so cute, don’t they. Their innocent little faces and big round eyes, makes you want scurry up and grab a quick selfie, doesn’t it? Well, guess what – it’s not a good idea.

With the proliferation of smartphones and people’s seemingly irresistible urge to grab selfies at every opportunity, it’s no surprise that in recent times we’ve been hearing stories of reckless wildlife adventurers sidling up beside all manner of creatures, from bears to snakes to sharks. And no, it doesn’t always end well.

Recommended Videos

In an apparent effort to preempt any disastrous run-ins with the New England seal population during the current pupping season, the National Oceanic and Atmosphere Administration (NOAA) recently posted a warning on its website titled, “No selfies with seals.”

The message insists that “there is no selfie stick long enough” for capturing such a shot, adding that no matter how tempting it might be “to get that perfect shot of yourself or your child with an adorable seal pup, please do the right thing and leave the seal pup alone.”

The scientific agency, knowing all too well that some selfie fanatics would love nothing more than a cute photo with a cuddly pup, says that “getting too close to a wild animal puts you – and the animal – at risk.”

Conjuring up images of blood, screams, and emergency response teams, NOAA warns that “seals have powerful jaws, and can leave a lasting impression.” In more ways than one.

The agency says it’s already received several reports of unfortunate incidents resulting in injuries as a result of humans “getting too close to an animal during a quick photo op,” adding, “When you get too close to a wild animal, you risk stressing or threatening it, and stressed animals are much more likely to act unpredictably.”

It warns that getting too close to a pup could cause its mother to abandon it, and advises people to stay at least 150 feet (46 meters) from any seal they see.

Of course, the absolute worst thing you could do would be to handle the animal while framing up that perfect selfie, but you already knew that … didn’t you?

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
RAMmageddon is coming for cameras, and your dream setup is in the crosshairs
Fujifilm's camera price hikes are just the latest sign of a DRAM crisis reshaping costs beyond smartphones and laptops.
Fujifilm's X100VI camera, released in 2024.

If you've been saving up for a new camera, I've got some bad news for you. Waiting until fall just got a lot more expensive. And this isn't some isolated issue troubling the camera industry. 

It's the same global chip crisis coming for basically everything with a processor and memory inside it.

Read more
Fujifilm Instax Mini 13 review: This instant camera won me over with its no-frills retro charm
From printing instant memories to rediscovering the fading charm of polaroids, Fujifilm's camera offers a budget route to a simple indulgence.
Fujifilm Instax mini 13 camera.

See at Amazon

Quick review

Read more
Want to try film photography? Kodak’s new $35 camera is a great place to start
This retro inspired Kodak EC35 camera keeps film photography refreshingly simple.
Kodak-EC35

If you've been curious about film photography but didn't want to spend a fortune, Kodak has a new camera worth checking out. The new Kodak EC35 is a reusable 35mm point-and-shoot camera that costs just $34.99, making it one of the most affordable ways to try shooting on film.

Developed by Reto Project under the Kodak brand, the EC35 keeps things simple with a lightweight design, automatic flash, and a pocket-friendly body. It also arrives as interest in analog photography continues to grow, offering beginners an inexpensive alternative to disposable film cameras.

Read more