Skip to main content

Nvidia’s prototype 1,700Hz display could unlock frame rates for future VR

NVIDIA Prototype 1,700Hz Zero Latency Display
As great a boon as the ever improving resolution of virtual reality headsets has been for their presence, comfort and visual fidelity, perhaps a more important improvement has been with refresh rates. At 90Hz, the VR experience has become much more comfortable than it was back in the day, but that might not even be a blip on the radar of future displays, which could have refresh rates as high as 1,700Hz.

That’s not hyperbole either. Nvidia has already debuted a working version of a 1,700Hz display at this year’s Graphics Technology Conference, impressing attendees with its potential for the future. In the video above, you can see that even when zoomed in with a microscope and shaken vigorously, Nvidia’s high-refresh-rate display was able to maintain a stable logo in the centre of the image.

Try doing that on a traditional display, even one of the 90Hz ones in a VR headset, and you are going to see a lot of blurring. As RoadToVR points out, those displays refresh an image once ever 11 milliseconds, whereas in contrast Nvidia’s prototype display does the same in 0.58 milliseconds.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Related: Our 6 absolute favorite HTC Vive launch games

This is particularly important because in virtual reality, frame rate is king. If you move your head and the world doesn’t keep up with your motion, your brain recognizes something is wrong and can make you feel ill. Although the latest generations of headsets, with 90Hz refresh rates, go far in making it a comfortable experience, extra frames per second would hardly hurt.

Of course we are unlikely to be able to own hardware that can render frame rates that can match the refresh rate of such a display any time soon, but Nvidia’s display would eliminate any lag from the display at least. It also means those with more powerful systems may be able to have smoother experiences, as well as prettier ones if they choose.

Editors' Recommendations

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is the Evergreen Coordinator for Computing, overseeing a team of writers addressing all the latest how to…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more