Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Web
  4. News

Amazon’s Choice products aren’t always what they claim to be

Add as a preferred source on Google

The Amazon’s Choice badges customers turn to for endorsed or recommended products were found sometimes to be fake or even unsafe. 

An investigation published by the Wall Street Journal reveals that the Amazon’s Choice badge can be attached to products that make false claims, have safety concerns, or are even manipulated by the sellers. The investigation said that while there are legitimate listings with a badge, customers should double-check what is “endorsed” by the tech giant. 

Recommended Videos

The Journal identified that the badge is more likely to appear on Amazon’s AmazonBasics products and that sellers were able to manipulate the endorsement by promoting specific keywords in the products’ description or contained other brand names. 

Examples of fake or illegitimate Amazon’s Choice products named in the investigation include cellphone chargers that claim they are made by Apple but are a completely different brand, as well as a fat burner supplement, which makes claims that are against Amazon’s policies. 

Amazon’s Choice badges were created in 2015 to coincide with the Amazon Alexa, so people could say, “Alexa, buy a cell phone charger,” and Alexa would add the top Amazon’s choice result to the shopping cart. 

The Journal reports that the retail giant chose Amazon’s Choice since it doesn’t precisely imply a full-on endorsement. 

“We chose it carefully to try to signal that this is a great product, but this is not something that we endorse,” a former Amazon executive told the Journal. 

According to Business Insider, an Amazon’s Choice product must meet a variety of qualifications for it to receive the badge. These include being able to ship through Amazon Prime, having a low return rate, a high customer rating, and frequently bought by buyers who searched for the same product. 

The badge process is most likely an ever-changing algorithm. Part of Amazon’s Creative Acceptance Policies states, “We prohibit the use of ‘Amazon’s Choice,’ ‘Amazon Best Seller,’ and Amazon ranking in static ads because these elements refresh frequently and may not remain accurate for the duration of the campaign.” 

In September, it was reported that Amazon adjusted its search algorithm so that its products would appear higher in the search results over competitors’ products. Amazon has since denied these claims. 

An Amazon spokesperson told Digital Trends a little bit more about the badge process.

“We know that customer trust is hard to earn and easy to lose, so we strive to protect customer trust in products Amazon’s Choice highlights. We don’t tolerate Amazon policy violations, such as review abuse, incentivized reviews, counterfeits or unsafe products,” the spokesperson said. “When deciding to badge a product as Amazon’s Choice, we proactively incorporate a number of factors that are designed to protect customers from those policy violations. When we identify a product that may not meet our high bar for products we highlight for customers, we remove the badge.”

Aside from Amazon’s Choice products, there are also “Sponsored Products,” which sellers must pay for to get their products on the first page of search results. There is also “Best Seller” products, which are the most bought items in specific categories. Out of the three product stamps, Best Seller products are going to be your best bet, since it rounds up products people have bought and rated. 

Allison Matyus
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Allison Matyus is a general news reporter at Digital Trends. She covers any and all tech news, including issues around social…
Anthropic’s sensitive internal data was exposed, and AI helped make it happen
Even the company behind Claude isn't immune to AI-powered security threats, as researchers discovered some worrying vulnerabilities.
Claude Anthropic Featured

AI companies spend enormous amounts of time convincing us their technology is safe and secure. But what happens when those same companies become targets of increasingly sophisticated AI-powered attacks? Anthropic, the company behind Claude, is now facing that question. According to a Washington Post report, cybersecurity startup Cathedral discovered vulnerabilities that let its researchers access sensitive information in Anthropic's internal systems.

The researchers used AI agents to identify potential entry points in less than 12 hours. Interestingly, they didn't need to crack Claude itself. Instead, they exploited weaknesses in third-party business applications that Anthropic uses for everyday operations. Anthropic's security testing program disclosed the findings, which allows outside researchers to identify and report vulnerabilities.

Read more
A new startup wants to fix the military’s working-dog shortage with cloning and gene editing
Promising pitch, plenty of unanswered questions about the dogs.
a new startup wants to fix the militarys working dog shortage with cloning and gene editing warhound featured image

Military working dogs charge into places the rest of us would flee. So, I understand why anyone would want to breed tougher, healthier dogs for the job.

Warhound, a new startup from Colossal Biosciences co-founder Ben Lamm and Anduril co-founder Palmer Luckey, has stepped out of stealth with $200 million to clone and gene-edit working dogs for American troops, police departments, and emergency services (via TechCrunch).

Read more
AI can describe a picture, but it still struggles to understand blind users
A University of Maryland study finds that Be My AI often buries useful answers in lengthy descriptions, leaving blind users to work harder to get the information they need.
Blind Man using walking stick

AI can describe a picture, identify objects, and answer questions about what a camera sees. But when a blind user needs a quick answer, getting an entire spoken essay about the scene isn't exactly helpful. Researchers at the University of Maryland (UMD) have found that AI-powered visual assistance can leave blind users doing too much work to get the information they actually need.

The study, titled Say It My Way: Exploring Control in Conversational Visual Question Answering with Blind Users, examined how people interact with Be My AI, an AI-powered feature of the Be My Eyes app. The researchers found that users often received lengthy descriptions that didn't adequately address their immediate goals, forcing them to ask follow-up questions or find ways to steer the AI towards a more useful answer.

Read more