Skip to main content

Intel CEO: PC Sales Could Rise in 2009

paul-otelliniThe worldwide personal-computer market is pulling out of its slump quickly and could defy predictions by growing this year, Intel Corp. CEO Paul Otellini said Tuesday.

Otellini’s comments at a conference Tuesday were more bullish than many analysts have been. Market research firms IDC and Gartner have both predicted a year-over-year decline in PC shipments in 2009, which would be the first such drop since 2001.

The market has been dragged by a clampdown in corporate spending on new PCs, and some computer companies are already looking to next year for a rebound. Sales of cheap little “netbook” computers, used primarily for surfing the Internet, have been a bright spot, but those machines ring up low profits for PC and chip makers. Intel is the world’s top maker of microprocessors, the “brains” of PCs.

Otellini said the rebound is being fueled by the fact computers are “indispensable, something that people need in their daily lives.”

“I think that the market is poised for a resurgence,” he said. He said he expects PC sales to be “flat to slightly up” this year from last.

Researchers at Gartner Inc. predict a 2 percent decline in PC shipments for 2009, though that’s better than a few months ago, when the group was forecasting a drop of 6 percent.

“Things are looking much better in the second half,” Gartner research director George Shiffler said Tuesday.

But Shiffler wasn’t quite willing to go as far as Otellini did. He expects second-half shipments to be flat from last year, not strong enough to push the entire year into positive territory.

“It wouldn’t surprise me if we did see positive growth, but that’s not our call at the moment,” Shiffler said. “I think that’s more of a best-case scenario.”

Intel shares rose 8 cents to $19.62 in afternoon trading. Shares of rival Advanced Micro Devices Inc. gained 30 cents, 5.2 percent, to $6.11.

Among PC makers, Dell Inc. fell 28 cents, 1.8 percent, to $15.73, while Hewlett-Packard Co. gained 68 cents, 1.5 percent, to $47.03.

Since Otellini proclaimed in April that PC sales had “bottomed out” after a miserable holiday season, he has been more aggressive in his forecasts than even Intel’s biggest customers. That has raised questions about how much of the recovery in Intel’s sales has been caused by computer makers restocking depleted chip supplies and how much has come from end users buying more machines.

Still, Otellini’s remarks Tuesday help explain Intel’s decision last month to raise its third-quarter revenue guidance to $8.8 billion to $9.2 billion. The previous range was $8.1 billion to $8.9 billion.

Otellini also used his presentation at the Intel Developers’ Forum to show off chips built on so-called 22-nanometer technology, which refers to the ever-shrinking size of circuitry on the most advanced chips. Those chips are still being developed in Intel’s factories and won’t go into production until 2011.

Each chip on the silicon “wafer” Otellini showed off has 2.9 billion transistors. Intel’s first chips in the 1970s had just a few thousand transistors.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Dena Cassella
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Haole built. O'ahu grown
I’ve used Intel CPUs for years. Here’s why I’m finally switching to AMD
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D held between fingertips.

I've been using Intel CPUs for close to seven years. It started with the Core i7-8700K, but I moved on to the Core i9-10900K, Core i9-12900K, and most recently, the Core i9-13900K, all of which could have occupied a slot among the best processors at different points in time. But after so much time with Team Blue, I'm switching back to AMD.

It comes at an interesting time for Intel and the PC hardware community as a whole, which is currently abuzz about a particular article claiming that Intel is objectively "better" for PC gamers. That's not what this article is. Instead, I want to walk you through why I chose to use AMD's Ryzen 7 7800X3D in my gaming PC, and how I came to the decision.
Stability struggles
The Intel Core i9-13900K CPU Jacob Roach / Digital Trends / Digital Trends

Read more
Some Intel CPUs lost 9% of their performance almost overnight
Someone holding the Core i9-12900KS processor.

Over the past few weeks, we've seen an increasing number of reports of instability on high-end Intel CPUs like the Core i9-14900K. Asus has released a BIOS update for its Z790 motherboards aimed at addressing the problem, but it carries a performance loss of upwards of 9% in some workloads.

The most recent BIOS update from Asus includes the Intel Baseline Profile. This profile disables various optimizations that are automatically applied on Asus Z790 motherboards and runs high-end Intel chips within Intel's specific limits. Hardwareluxx tested the new profile with the Core i9-14900K and found that the CPU ran around 9% slower in multiple tests.

Read more
We might have an answer to Intel’s crashing crisis
Intel's 14900K CPU socketed in a motherboard.

Intel is facing some big problems with its 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs. As we reported on last week, gamers are returning high-end Intel CPUs in droves because of inexplicable crashes when playing the latest games. Now, we might have a solution, at least until Intel can tackle the problem properly.

The guidance comes from Falcon Northwest, which is a Portland-based system builder that received a rare perfect score from Digital Trends (read our Falcon Northwest Tiki review for more on that). Kelt Reeves, president of Falcon Northwest, said that the team has had "many long days of testing on many different CPUs that had developed issues here in our production and in the field from our clients." The result of that testing is a list of BIOS settings that should fix the problem.

Read more