Skip to main content

FCC Chairman: AT&T/T-Mobile deal not in public interest, hearing requested, reports WSJ

FCC Chairman Julius GenachowskiFederal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski will allegedly come out against the proposed AT&T acquisition of T-Mobile USA, saying that the deal is not in the public interest, reports the Wall Street Journal, citing persons close to the matter. Genachowski is reportedly asking the other four FCC commissioners to approve an administrative hearing, during which AT&T and T-Mobile would be forced to convince the panel why the merger would serve the public interest — an argument that the FCC says the wireless companies have so far failed to make.

The FCC’s resistance against the AT&T/T-Mobile merger follows a lawsuit by the Department of Justice to block the deal. If approved, the FCC hearing would not take place until the DoJ lawsuit trial, which is set to begin in February, has concluded. Both the FCC and the Justice Department must approve the $39 billion sale before it can proceed.

Following the DoJ’s suit against the merger, Genachowski said that the FCC has “serious concerns about the impact of the proposed transaction,” which could prove detrimental to customers and the wireless industry as a whole.

In a statement issued to Consumerist, AT&T senior vice president of Corporate Communications called the FCC’s actions “disappointing.” He added: “It is yet another example of a government agency acting to prevent billions in new investment and the creation of many thousands of new jobs at a time when the US economy desperately needs both. At this time, we are reviewing all options.”

The last time the FCC held an administrative hearing over a corporate merger was in 2002. The hearing reviewed the proposed merger of EchoStar and DirecTV. That deal was later abandoned.

If the AT&T/T-Mobile deal falls apart, AT&T will be forced to pay Deutche Telekom AG, the current parent company of T-Mobile, between $3 billion and $6 billion in penalties.

The FCC is expected to officially announce its plans for a hearing on the merger soon. But we can already hear the champagne glasses clinking at Sprint headquarters.

Editors' Recommendations

Andrew Couts
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
I compared Google and Samsung’s AI photo-editing tools. It’s not even close
A person holding the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Google Pixel 8 Pro.

The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (left) and Google Pixel 8 Pro Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Most phones nowadays are equipped with dual lens or triple lens camera systems and have powerful photo-editing tools baked natively into the software. This means most people have a compact photo-editing suite in their pocket every day.

Read more
The Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Flip 6 release date just leaked
Two Galaxy Z Fold 5 phones next to each other -- one is open and one is closed.

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 (left) and Galaxy Z Flip 5 Andrew Martonik / Digital Trends

Samsung is just months away from its next Unpacked event, where it will announce the previously teased Galaxy Ring alongside the next Galaxy Z Fold and Z Flip phones. The event, which could have the most number of devices launching at one Samsung event, is set a couple weeks ahead of last year's event.

Read more
Forget about the TikTok ban; now the U.S. might ban DJI
The DJI Mavic 3 Classic top view in flight

The specter of a U.S. market ban is once again looming over DJI, the biggest drone camera maker in the world. “DJI is on a Defense Department list of Chinese military companies whose products the U.S. armed forces will be prohibited from purchasing in the future,” reports The New York Times.

The defense budget for 2024 mentions a possible ban on importing DJI camera gear for federal agencies and government-funded programs. In 2021, the U.S. Treasury Department put DJI on a list of companies suspected of having ties to the Chinese military and alleged complicity in the surveillance of a minority group, culminating in investment and export restrictions.

Read more