Skip to main content

Hackers rig Time’s Person of the Year online poll to coronate Miley Cyrus

hackers rig times person year online poll coronate miley cyrus time of the
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Will Miley Cyrus be Time magazine’s Person of the Year? If a team of savvy hackers get their way, she’ll twerk and tongue her way to the top of a reader poll. 

Time chooses a “Person of the Year” annually, and this year, they’re running an online poll to see who readers want. Until recently, Edward Snowden was in the lead, but Miley has usurped his place. She holds 29.8 percent of the vote, with a substantial lead over Snowden and controversial Indian politician Narenda Modi. but even though Cyrus is imploring fans on Twitter to vote, her social media encouragement isn’t the reason she’s in the lead. After talking with Daily Dot reporter Fernando Alfonso III about potential voting loopholes, two programmers called Gains and Marek decided to develop a work-around to catapult Cyrus past her competitors. 

Gains and Marek found a way to rig the reader poll within an hour by creating a software script that circumvented authentification on Twitter and Facebook to allow automated votes. This meant they could vote on behalf of people surreptitiously (Gains and Marek could probably get hired by some corrupt politicians if they wanted). This is especially sad for Time because the magazine tried to boost security this year after previous hacking incidents, including a security failure in 2012 where hackers ran a program that gave despotic North Korean leader Kim Jong-un the top spot. But apparently the precautions were no match for Gains and Marek. 

The programmer duo chose Miley over more controversial picks like the accused Boston bombers, Dhozkhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, noting that Cyrus is a more lighthearted choice. Their efforts helped Cyrus rise from fifteenth place to first, where she currently sits. 

Of course, Time doesn’t let its readers decide who gets called the Person of the Year — the editors decide. So even if the programmers tilt the poll even more overwhelmingly in Cyrus’ favor by the time voting closes on December 6, it won’t impact who is finally chosen. Perhaps it will impact how Time prioritizes its digital security. 

Topics
Kate Knibbs
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kate Knibbs is a writer from Chicago. She is very happy that her borderline-unhealthy Internet habits are rewarded with a…
Bluesky barrels toward 1 million new sign-ups in a day
Bluesky social media app logo.

Social media app Bluesky has picked nearly a million new users just a day after exiting its invitation-only beta and opening to everyone.

In a post on its main rival -- X (formerly Twitter) -- Bluesky shared a chart showing a sudden boost in usage on the app, which can now be downloaded for free for iPhone and Android devices.

Read more
How to make a GIF from a YouTube video
woman sitting and using laptop

Sometimes, whether you're chatting with friends or posting on social media, words just aren't enough -- you need a GIF to fully convey your feelings. If there's a moment from a YouTube video that you want to snip into a GIF, the good news is that you don't need complex software to so it. There are now a bunch of ways to make a GIF from a YouTube video right in your browser.

If you want to use desktop software like Photoshop to make a GIF, then you'll need to download the YouTube video first before you can start making a GIF. However, if you don't want to go through that bother then there are several ways you can make a GIF right in your browser, without the need to download anything. That's ideal if you're working with a low-specced laptop or on a phone, as all the processing to make the GIF is done in the cloud rather than on your machine. With these options you can make quick and fun GIFs from YouTube videos in just a few minutes.
Use GIFs.com for great customization
Step 1: Find the YouTube video that you want to turn into a GIF (perhaps a NASA archive?) and copy its URL.

Read more
I paid Meta to ‘verify’ me — here’s what actually happened
An Instagram profile on an iPhone.

In the fall of 2023 I decided to do a little experiment in the height of the “blue check” hysteria. Twitter had shifted from verifying accounts based (more or less) on merit or importance and instead would let users pay for a blue checkmark. That obviously went (and still goes) badly. Meanwhile, Meta opened its own verification service earlier in the year, called Meta Verified.

Mostly aimed at “creators,” Meta Verified costs $15 a month and helps you “establish your account authenticity and help[s] your community know it’s the real us with a verified badge." It also gives you “proactive account protection” to help fight impersonation by (in part) requiring you to use two-factor authentication. You’ll also get direct account support “from a real person,” and exclusive features like stickers and stars.

Read more