Skip to main content

‘Lone Survivor’ review

Lone Survivor is the sort of movie that kicks your teeth in. As war films go, it’s as tough a watch as you’ll find. Director Peter Berg perfectly captures the tension and the pain of Navy SEAL Marcus Luttrell’s harrowing five-day journey across Afghanistan. The based-on-truth story of 2005’s Operation Red Wings isn’t without its shortcomings, but Berg’s tight production helps to smooth out any wrinkles as the plot careens along from one terrible moment to the next.

Lone Survivor opens quietly enough, offering up a slice-of-military-life on base during wartime. Luttrell (Mark Wahlberg) and his fellow SEALs may be the U.S. military version of supermen, but we also see them as regular fellows with real hopes and dreams. They have wives and girlfriends to come home to, weddings to plan for. The opening half-hour is filled with small moments and brief glimpses at the material cost of war: the lives that these men who made the ultimate sacrifice left behind.

Lone Survivor is the sort of movie that kicks your teeth in.

It is time well-spent, for the most part. Seemingly trivial moments come to reverberate later in the film, whether it’s a hasty IM exchange between husband and wife, or a humorous back-and-forth over the realities of purchasing an Arabian horse. Berg’s early character-building with Luttrell, Danny Dietz (Emile Hirsch), Matt Axelson (Ben Foster), and Mike Murphy (Taylor Kitsch) that plays out early on is vital to the emotional impact of the rest of the film.

The principal shortcoming in all of this scene-setting is its emphasis on jargon. Berg’s 2007 effort The Kingdom suffered from the same problem. The director embraces realism to the point of distraction. The rapid-fire pace of Lone Survivor’s intro serves to get us to the heart of the story that much quicker – and that’s a good thing – but keeping up with the rapid-fire military jargon in the run-up to Red Wings is a challenge for those not steeped in soldierspeak.

To Berg’s credit, he stuffs a lot of important information into Lone Survivor’s first act. The personal moments are just as vital as the dense jargon. The problem is that it flies by just a little too quickly once Red Wings moves into the briefing phase. A fan of first-person shooter video games may be versed in some of this language, but the abundance of acronyms and shorthand is difficult for the average viewer to follow.

The jargon never fully disappears later on, but meanings become clearer as action serves to define the words. The goat herders that discover SEAL Team 10 – and ultimately give away the location of the U.S. force – are the subject of a heated exchange over how to interpret the Rules Of Engagement. There’s a stark contrast between the intro’s briefing and the hurried debate over how to deal with these Afghani interlopers.

The goat herder scene is a pivotal trigger moment for the film, and the performances sell it. All of the pain and misery to come hinges on the decisions made in this brief stretch of minutes. The real life goat herders were released unharmed and then quickly gave up the position of the SEALs. Berg’s tight balance between soldier shop-talk and emotional outbursts at the idea of executing civilians – an option that was considered – is what sells the scene. It’s hard to forget while you’re watching that the actual Luttrell and his squadmates faced this very decision; whether or not it unfolded as Berg imagines it did, the scene carries across the indecision the actual soldiers no doubt felt.

Once the chase is on, Berg wields tension like a blunt instrument. Every moment is fraught. Bullets whizz around in all directions, wounds are captured in stark close-ups, and tumbles down Afghanistan’s rocky hills make use of slow-mo to highlight the bone-on-stone impacts. It’s all heightened by sharp sound design that amplifies every juddering assault rifle and concussive blast. The middle act maintains a lightning pace all the way through, and it never lets up on demonstrating the level of physical punishment these SEALs suffered through. It’s graphic, but more than that, it’s just brutal.

Berg elicits top-quality performances out of the four actors at the center of all this chaos. There’s a bit of dissonance in the idea of Wahlberg, clearly showing his 42-year age, being a subordinate, but he acquits himself well of the difficult Luttrell role. Murphy is younger than Luttrell in real life as well, but Wahlberg’s combined age and movie star face disrupts the illusion somewhat.

Once the chase is on, Berg wields tension like a blunt instrument.

Kitsch also shines as squad leader Michael Murphy in a handful of Lone Survivor’s more poignant moments, but make no mistake: all four stars carry the movie well. Supporting players like Eric Bana, the operation’s CO who later leads a search and rescue party, align their talents around heightening the realism, but the film’s heart beats for the four SEALs on the ground.

The final act can’t hope to reach the heights of the hurried escape efforts that highlight Lone Survivor’s midsection. At first, a slowed pace is the culprit, though chalk that up to being a necessary breather as we transition from Escape to Rescue. More disruptively, however, the specter of Hollywood looms large over this last stretch of story.

The reality of Luttrell’s rescue played out differently than it does on film. While there’s no way to tease out the real truth from what you see on the screen, the timeliness of Wahlberg-as-Luttrell’s extraction feels just a bit too convenient. It’s a forgivable offense, committed in the name of putting a tension-filled cap on this incredible survival story, but the plotting of the third act still strays too far into ‘trite Hollywood ending’ territory.

Minor shortcoming aside, this is Berg at his very best, with no small amount of credit due to cinematographer Tobias A. Schliessler as well. The four stars carry the heavy performance load exceptionally well, somehow infusing light, even humorous, moments into a difficult story. Lone Survivor is the best kind of wartime storytelling, offering a spiritually honest portrayal of boots on the ground that is equal parts devastating, exciting, and entertaining.

Editors' Recommendations

Adam Rosenberg
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Previously, Adam worked in the games press as a freelance writer and critic for a range of outlets, including Digital Trends…
3 things I want in Fallout 5 after watching Amazon’s Fallout series
Lucy enters a house in Fallout.

Fallout has been the watercooler TV show this month, an impressive feat for a video game adaptation. Although Bethesda doesn't have any new Fallout games to release alongside it, the Amazon Prime series has reinvigorated interest in Fallout, with all its titles seeing notable player count increases. For now, we’ll have to be content with a Fallout 4 current-gen upgrade, but I’ll admit that my mind is drifting to thinking about Fallout 5.

Bethesda’s Todd Howard has teased that Fallout 5 will be the next project Bethesda Game Studios works on after Elder Scrolls 6. While that likely means its release is at least a decade away unless Bethesda fast-tracks it, I still find it fun to theorize about where a true single-player Fallout 5 could go next. These three particular things are what I want to see the most.
Set it somewhere new

Read more
I was wrong about cloud gaming. One small setup change showed me the light
The Logitech G Cloud Gaming Handheld sits on a stack of comics.

I never had much faith in cloud gaming.

The reality of current internet infrastructure and reliability just felt -- and in many ways still feels -- too far off for streaming to provide a close enough experience to the "real" thing for gamers to accept. I even gave it my best shot to change my mind one year ago this week by committing to only playing games via cloud for an entire week. What I found was that, in my situation, there were only select games where the input delay was tolerable enough to consider it as a primary way to play. It's a great option for those who can't get expensive hardware, but it wouldn't find an audience among the hardcore gamers who have better alternatives.

Read more
This Dell gaming laptop with an RTX 3050 is discounted to $700
Dell G15 gaming laptop on a table.

You don't need to spend thousands of dollars to be able to get a decent gaming laptop, as there are budget-friendly options like the Dell G15 with the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 graphics card. It's currently even cheaper at just $700, following a $200 discount on its original price of $900. We're not sure how much time is remaining on this offer though, so if you think this is the perfect gaming laptop for you, stop hesitating and proceed with the purchase immediately to make sure that you don't miss out on the savings.

Why you should buy the Dell G15 gaming laptop
The Dell G15 is highlighted in our list of the best gaming laptops as the best budget gaming laptop under $1,000, as it provides dependable performance while staying affordable for most gamers. It's equipped with the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 graphics card, which is perfect for budget gaming, and pairs it with the 13th-generation Intel Core i5 processor and 8GB of RAM. These specifications are more than enough to be able to play the best PC games, though you may have to dial down the settings for the more demanding titles.

Read more