Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Survey Finds Companies Aren’t Rushing to Windows 7

Add as a preferred source on Google
Survey Finds Companies Aren
Image used with permission by copyright holder

ScriptLogic makes its money helping enterprises, companies, and organizations manage their Windows-based networks. So, to get a feel for how companies were planning for Microsoft’s upcoming Windows 7 operating system, ScriptLogic send out 20,000 surveys to IT professionals and admins to find out how they felt about Windows 7. Some 1,000 surveys were returned, and the results find just 5.4 percent of companies plan to upgrade to Windows 7 by the end of 2009, and 34 percent plan to upgrade by the end of 2010. But, perhaps more ominous, 60 percent of respondents don’t plan to upgrade to Windows 7 at all.

Some forty-two percent of the companies responding said “lack of time and resources” was a principle factor in choosing to avoid Windows 7. Another 39 percent cited concerns over application compatibility, and another part of the survey found that some 35 percent of respondents had already put off upgrades and purchases in order to save money, potentially indicating the economic crunch has companies putting off hardware and software to shore up their bottom lines.

Recommended Videos

Many companies and enterprises did not shift to WIndows Vista due to concerns over both cost and software compatibility. Businesses that rely on specialized software or devices typically have to perform extensive testing before certifying an operating system for use in their organizations.

Before reading too much into the survey results, it’s important to remember that 1,000 respondents to 20,000 questionnaires represents only a 5 percent response rate, and those responders are self-selecting: both factors mean the results of the survey could be significantly different from trends among Windows-based businesses—let alone the wider the Windows-using world.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more