Skip to main content

Facebook Instant Articles aren't doing that well, and publishers aren't pleased about it

facebook instant articles apple news
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Not everything Facebook touches turns to gold. It’s just that it normally does a better job of hiding that stuff. Not so with Facebook Instant Articles, which has now drawn the ire of heavy hitting publishing partners like the Washington Post and the New York Times.

Instant Articles, launched last month, is heralded as the best way for media outlets to push content. According to Facebook, the platform leverages “the same technology used to display photos and videos quickly in the Facebook app,” which allows articles to load instantly, “as much as 10 times faster than the standard mobile Web.”

But speed aside, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal, these media outlets “are finding it difficult to extract as much revenue per article from Instant Articles as they do from pages on their own websites.” And that means that Facebook is going back to the drawing board with new advertising schemes, because let’s be honest, you’re connecting more with advertisers than you are with your friends when you’re logging onto social media these days.

As per sources familiar with the issue at hand, the problem with Instant Articles lies in its strict rules on ad volume and type. According to Facebook’s guidelines, advertisers are allowed one “large banner” ad (320 x 250 pixels) for every 500 words of text. When compared to how content appears on the publisher’s native platform, like the mobile app of The New York Times, three or sometimes four ads will appear within a single article. A bit annoying for the reader? Sure. More effective for the publisher? Absolutely.

Moreover, the WSJ notes, “Facebook is also restricting the type of ads publishers may place in Instant Articles,” and currently bans “rich media” ads, or those that allow for readers to interact with the content. But all these strict rules may change very soon, Instant Articles product manager Michael Reckhow says, and already, the platform is running some experiments with a greater number of banner ads and interactive, animated media.

“It’s early days with Instant Articles,” Reckhow says, “But one of our principles from the beginning has been to work collaboratively with our publishing partners to understand their needs and shape the product.”

Editors' Recommendations

Lulu Chang
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
Bluesky barrels toward 1 million new sign-ups in a day
Bluesky social media app logo.

Social media app Bluesky has picked nearly a million new users just a day after exiting its invitation-only beta and opening to everyone.

In a post on its main rival -- X (formerly Twitter) -- Bluesky shared a chart showing a sudden boost in usage on the app, which can now be downloaded for free for iPhone and Android devices.

Read more
How to make a GIF from a YouTube video
woman sitting and using laptop

Sometimes, whether you're chatting with friends or posting on social media, words just aren't enough -- you need a GIF to fully convey your feelings. If there's a moment from a YouTube video that you want to snip into a GIF, the good news is that you don't need complex software to so it. There are now a bunch of ways to make a GIF from a YouTube video right in your browser.

If you want to use desktop software like Photoshop to make a GIF, then you'll need to download the YouTube video first before you can start making a GIF. However, if you don't want to go through that bother then there are several ways you can make a GIF right in your browser, without the need to download anything. That's ideal if you're working with a low-specced laptop or on a phone, as all the processing to make the GIF is done in the cloud rather than on your machine. With these options you can make quick and fun GIFs from YouTube videos in just a few minutes.
Use GIFs.com for great customization
Step 1: Find the YouTube video that you want to turn into a GIF (perhaps a NASA archive?) and copy its URL.

Read more
I paid Meta to ‘verify’ me — here’s what actually happened
An Instagram profile on an iPhone.

In the fall of 2023 I decided to do a little experiment in the height of the “blue check” hysteria. Twitter had shifted from verifying accounts based (more or less) on merit or importance and instead would let users pay for a blue checkmark. That obviously went (and still goes) badly. Meanwhile, Meta opened its own verification service earlier in the year, called Meta Verified.

Mostly aimed at “creators,” Meta Verified costs $15 a month and helps you “establish your account authenticity and help[s] your community know it’s the real us with a verified badge." It also gives you “proactive account protection” to help fight impersonation by (in part) requiring you to use two-factor authentication. You’ll also get direct account support “from a real person,” and exclusive features like stickers and stars.

Read more