Skip to main content

Rhapsody won’t bend to Apple’s new iTunes policy

rhapsody-iphoneMusic subscription service Rhapsody isn’t a fan of Apple’s new App Store guidelines, and it’s letting everyone know. In response to the new purchasing policies, Rhapsody has issued a statement:

“Our philosophy is simple too – an Apple-imposed arrangement that requires us to pay 30 percent of our revenue to Apple, in addition to content fees that we pay to the music labels, publishers and artists, is economically untenable. The bottom line is we would not be able to offer our service through the iTunes store if subjected to Apple’s 30 percent monthly fee vs. a typical 2.5 percent credit card free.”

Currently, Rhapsody’s app operates by automatically opening Safari and taking users to Rhapsody’s Website. According to Apple’s updated policy, Rhapsody can continue to do this, but it must also offer in-app subscriptions, of which Apple would get that notorious 30 percent cut. According to Rhapsody, not only can it not afford this fee, it’s willing to sue the iTunes operator.

And according to a report in the Wall Street Journal, the music provider may stand a chance in court. The new iTunes subscription policy apparently raises some legal red flags, and according to antitrust experts, there is reason to challenge the policy. In order to accuse Apple of violating antitrust laws, it must first be ascertained that the company is a dominant force in the market and that it is also driving out its competitors. According to Herbert Hovenkamp, an antitrust professor at the University of Iowa College of Law, if Apple is distributing 60 percent or more of subscription content through the App Store, “then you might move into territory where an antitrust challenge would seem feasible.”

Rhapsody’s statement also noted that it will be “collaborating with our market peers in determining an appropriate legal and business response to this latest development.” Rhapsody currently has 750,000 customers, although less than half of these users subscribe through iTunes. But if you’re one of them, know that using the service app free through Safari will be spotty, and otherwise, you’re out of luck. It seems like various music subscribers may be cutting their ties with iTunes, not to mention other types of content providers. Sony for one has hinted at the idea of pulling its business from iTunes.

Apple has given developers until June to adhere to its new guidelines.

Editors' Recommendations

Molly McHugh
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
Why iTunes had to die to be reborn
leaving itunes music store open can kill macs battery life logo 2015

iTunes was the reason I purchased my very first Apple MacBook. Not because I wanted to use the software in particular, or because I was so keen to buy music through it. I’d just got my first iPhone, and syncing it with iTunes on a Windows laptop was so hateful, I’d have done anything to avoid it.

Back then, in around 2008, the only way to update, backup, or transfer content to an iPhone was through iTunes. It was an essential piece of the puzzle, and because over-the-air software updates didn’t arrive until 2011 with iOS 5, there was no way other option. iTunes on Windows at that time was truly awful: Slow, frustrating, and fond of crashing.

Read more
Lawsuit alleges Apple disclosed information about iTunes purchases
hands on itunes radio cant out dj pandora but it sure does look pretty main

Apple may promote itself as a privacy-focused company, but a new lawsuit alleges that it sells off personal data regarding iTunes purchases.

The lawsuit was brought by three iTunes customers from Rhode Island and Michigan to federal court in San Fransisco on Friday, according to Bloomberg. The three customers are filing on behalf of all the iTunes customers whose information could have been sold or shared without their consent.

Read more
Best printer deals: 10+ cheap printers on sale as low as $79
An HP OfficeJet Pro 9015e all-in-one printer rests on a white table with plants and a thumb drive beside it.

Even though going digital has become easier than ever, there is still a need to print, especially if you're a small or medium business. Luckily, the world of printers hasn't slowed down at all in the past few years, so whether you need to print character sheets for your D&D campaign or receipts for your business, there are a lot of printers to pick from. In fact, some of the best printer brands on the market have a lot of solid options, including in the budget range for those who don't need a ton of printing. And while it may be hard to find a good deal on the best printers, we're pretty sure our collection of deals will get you pretty close.
Canon Pixma TR4722 -- $79, was $99

While it isn’t one of the best all-in-one printers, it’s certainly one of the most affordable. There’s something to be said about a printer that can come in at such a low price yet still offer quality printing. This printer will work well in any home, apartment, or dorm room setting. It even goes beyond printing and is capable of making copies, scanning, and faxing. It connects easily to your devices with built-in wireless connectivity, and it can print at a rate of about nine pages per minute monochrome and four pages per minute color.

Read more