Skip to main content

2015 GMC Canyon SLT review

GMC’s 2015 Canyon is a huge step forward for mid-size trucks … but so is its price tag

2015 GMC Canyon SLT front angle
2015 GMC Canyon SLT
MSRP $34,345.00
“The GMC Canyon may stand head and shoulders above its competition, but it still suffers from the problems endemic in the midsize truck segment.”
  • Refined interior
  • Good fuel economy on four-cylinder
  • Good highway manners
  • High price
  • Wheezy four-cylinder performance

The GMC Canyon enters what is perhaps the most schizophrenic segment in the automotive world: midsize trucks. The main competition is both old — the current Nissan Frontier and Toyota Tacoma are more than a decade old — and surprisingly expensive. Perhaps it is no surprise that the Canyon should have something of a split personality.

On the one hand, it’s refinement and interior quality blow the competition out of the water. On the other, like its competitors, its capabilities come at a shockingly high price.

Classing up the joint

Most midsize truck interiors are so dark, gloomy, and uncomfortable that one could be forgiven for assuming they were built from castoffs of a Guantanamo Bay interrogation room. While the interior of my Canyon press demonstrator was black, riding in it was far from enhanced interrogation.

For starters, it is a very comfortable place to be. The leather-wrapped seats — cloth and vinyl are also available — were extremely comfortable. And, despite being the double-cab model, there was plenty of space. At least, there was plenty of space in the front seats. The jump seats might be most useful for extracting secrets, but they aren’t what I would call comfortable for adults.


Peter Braun/Digital Trends

More than just being comfortable, the interior also lived up to GMC’s classy but conservative aesthetics. The tall, horizontal dash and big chunky controls give it a sense of ruggedness, but the high-quality, soft-touch materials and nicely executed IntelliLink infotainment give it a grown-up, refined sensibility. In fact, my only real qualm with the interior was the glossy, fake wood trim, which seemed to be from even faker trees than usual.

Daily Driver

The refined interior is complemented by prep-school road manners. When I attended the launch of the Canyon, the lead engineer explained that they expected many customers to come to the Canyon from cars and crossovers, so a high-quality and quiet ride were crucial.

The biggest problem with the GMC Canyon, by a country mile, is the price.

This focus becomes apparent on the highway especially, where the Canyon rides smooth and quietly. On surface streets, the Canyon does have some more truck-like qualities. The steering is heavier than most cars and crossovers, but it is direct. On rough pavement, the Canyon can’t get past its ladder frame chassis and leaf springs, as the rear-end gets fairly bouncy. Still, the truck remains comfortable.

Unfortunately, the same praise can’t quite be made for the Canyon’s powertrain. The 2.5-liter inline four-cylinder under the hood of my Canyon SLT may have been capable of a rated 20 mpg in the city and 27 mpg on the highway, but it is also rough and slow. Mated to a six speed automatic, the 2.5-liter puts out 200 horsepower and 191 pound-feet of torque.

This is enough to get around, but, at points, it feels like the engine is struggling. The transmission, too, doesn’t quite feel up to the job, with rough shifts and a penchant for holding gears far longer than seems necessary. Fortunately, the far smoother and more powerful 300-hp 3.6-liter V6 is available as a $1,000 option. With a combined 21 mpg on two-wheel drive (2WD) models, it’s only a marginal improvement on the mileage of full-sized trucks.

Why so expensive?

The biggest problem with the GMC Canyon, by a country mile, is the price. The SLT model I was driving may have cost more than $32,000, but it was a double cab with 2WD and a four-cylinder. To get a well-equipped V6 Crew Cab with four-wheel drive (4WD) buyers will have to shell out at least $38,000. And that’s well before must-have options are tacked on. I drove a version of that high-end truck at the launch. It’s very nice, but it is also a lot of money.

In fact, a GMC Sierra 1500 with 4WD and a Crew Cab starts at around $39,000 — albeit with less equipment — and the Ram 1500 EcoDiesel Quad Cab, which actually gets better mileage, starts at $42,000. So why is the Canyon so damn expensive? Well, there are several issues. First is competition.

At the moment, the GMC Canyon and its partner in crime the Chevy Colorado are head and shoulders above the Nissan Frontier and the Toyota Tacoma, which are the only other options for mid-size truck buyers. That allows GMC to charge a premium in an already overpriced segment. The new Tacoma, being released later this year, may force GMC to drop price. Ram and Ford, though, have shown no interest in entering the segment, so limited competition will continue to inflate prices.

What is more, GMC expects its customers to buy a mid-size truck because they actively want something smaller, rather than because of pricing. GMC envisions the Canyon customer as a city dweller who needs – or simply wants — a truck for recreational purposes … and doesn’t want to thread a dreadnaught-sized Sierra through the streets. The result is a pricing structure that reflects desire rather than need.

Lastly there is simple physics. If consumers want a truck that has a usable back seat and bed, there is only so much the manufacturer can do to keep size and cost down. This is evident on the Canyon, which, despite being narrower than the full-size Sierra, is only a few inches shorter when similarly set up. The reality is that mid-size just isn’t as small as it used to be.

Hope on the horizon

In the end, I am torn on the Canyon. For midsize truck buyers, the stylish and refined GMC is a massive step forward when compared to the competition. However, considering the price, it is hard to feel like consumers will be getting a deal.

Fortunately, there is something coming that may change the whole picture. GM has said that it plans to introduce a 2.8-liter light-duty diesel engine to the Canyon and Colorado in 2016. While this engine is likely to command a premium, it should dramatically improve both the truck’s efficiency and capability. This will give the Canyon lineup the push it really needs.


  • Refined interior
  • Good fuel economy on four-cylinder
  • Good highway manners


  • High price
  • Wheezy four-cylinder performance

Editors' Recommendations

Mercedes EV charging hubs are coming to North America by the end of the decade
What a future Mercedes-Benz EV charging hub might look like.

You can't have more electric cars without more charging stations, so Mercedes-Benz is building a global charging network covering North America, China, Europe, and other major markets to support its goal of going all-electric by the end of the decade where market conditions allow.

Announced at CES 2023, the network should be in place by the end of the decade in line with Mercedes' electrification goal. It's a bold move by the automaker, which has mostly relied on third-party charging networks until now.

Read more
Tesla Model X vs. Tesla Model Y: Range, speed, price, and other specs compared
Novitec Tesla Model X

Every major carmaker, from Ford to Volvo and beyond, makes an EV these days, but Tesla has had a bit of a head start. As a result, it now offers a well-rounded lineup of electric cars, including sedans and SUVs. Tesla’s cars are still some of the best EVs out there, and if you’re in the market for an electric car, you’re likely considering a Tesla.

Larger cars, like SUVs and crossovers, are the most popular in the U.S. right now — and Tesla offers two of them: The Tesla Model X and the Tesla Model Y. Both have their advantages and disadvantages, and there are a few major differences, including price. Here’s everything you need to know about the two cars and why one or the other might be better for your needs.
Tesla Model X vs. Tesla Model Y: Design

Read more
Chrysler Synthesis demonstrator brings more screens and software to vehicle cockpits
Chrysler Synthesis cockpit demonstrator

Chrysler isn’t generally known for technological innovation, but the brand at the core of automotive conglomerate Stellantis wants to change that.
Unveiled at CES 2023, the Chrysler Synthesis demonstrator is a mock-up of what the automaker claims is its vehicle cockpit of the future. Featuring a vast expanse of screens and smart software, it sets expectations as Chrysler prepares to revamp its aging lineup in the coming years with a fleet of EVs.

The two-seat cockpit demonstrator is dominated by two dashboard screens. One reaches nearly across the dashboard, while a second smaller screen is nestled into the passenger’s side corner of the dash. While front-passenger screens are already available on vehicles like the Jeep Grand Cherokee, from Chrysler’s fellow Stellantis brand, this is a more stylish application that makes it seem like the entire dashboard is one big screen, measuring 37.2 inches.
Behind the screens are three software platforms: STLA Smart Cockpit, STLA Brain, and STLA AutoDrive. STLA Smart Cockpit handles the displays, while STLA Brain enables underlying features like over-the-air (OTA) updates and a virtual assistant that can sync the car with a driver’s phone or smart home devices, as well as recommend parking and EV charging options or handle e-commerce transactions.
STLA AutoDrive is a driver-assist system that will allow drivers to take their hands off the wheel and their eyes off the road in certain situations, Chrysler claims. When engaged, the Synthesis cockpit reconfigures to let drivers do other tasks — such as videoconferencing or karaoke — that wouldn’t be advisable without a high level of automation.
Before setting out, the car welcomes its driver using biometric authentication, and can then set up a trip plan based on personal schedules, weather, and the car’s state of charge.
The physical cockpit demonstrator is based on the Chrysler Airflow concept, an electric SUV unveiled at CES 2022. Chrysler claims it was made with 100% sustainable materials, with all plastics derived from post-industrial sources or recovered from oceans.
This high-tech cockpit doesn’t correspond to a specific production car, however. The Airflow is still just a concept vehicle, and Chrysler was vague on how close the Synthesis layout is to being production-ready. Chrysler will be the first Stellantis brand to use the STLA Smart Cockpit, STLA Brain, and STLA AutoDrive tech platforms in North America, but they might appear in a different wrapper than what we’re seeing here. Chrysler has a habit of making bug CES announcements that don’t lead anywhere, going back to 2017’s Portal concept.
Chrysler plans to launch its first EV in 2025 and go all-electric in 2028. That’s not a difficult task considering that, with the imminent discontinuation of the 300 sedan, the only Chryslers left will be the Pacifica and fleet-only Voyager minivans.

Read more