Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

2019 BMW M4 CS review

BMW gives the M4 CS additional performance cred, but it comes with lots of tradeoffs

2019 bmw m4 cs review fw
Bradley Iger/Digital Trends
2019 BMW M4 CS
MSRP $101,400.00
“The CS tangibly elevates both the M4’s look and performance, but pricing doesn’t match the upgrades.”
Pros
  • Sharp aesthetic upgrades
  • Responsive handling
  • Excellent stopping power from optional carbon ceramic brakes
Cons
  • No manual transmission option
  • Lack of arm rests on door and center console is annoying
  • Pricey, even with minimal options

Years ago, BMW’s M division became a standard bearer for fast, engaging street cars that infused a bit of motorsport-derived performance into the mix, finding a balance between the responsiveness that enthusiasts crave from a sports car and the refinement they need in a daily driver.

Recommended Videos

That mission has evolved over time, though, and M models have leaned more into comfort, tech features, and style rather than outright dynamic capability in recent years. But middling dynamics paired with a lack of emotional character isn’t a strong combination when the goal is to attract the attention of luxury performance enthusiasts. And while it’s a formidable machine in its own right, the M4 has faced worthy competition both from not only its German rivals, but from our side of the pond as well, with cars like the Camaro SS 1LE and Mustang Shelby GT350 proving that the Americans can build a car that turns as well as it goes.

But in 2016, BMW gave the M4 a large dose of credibility when it unleashed the limited-production GTS model, a hardcore, track-tuned machine replete with fixed-back racing buckets, racy aero bits, and a trick water injection system that bumped its turbocharged output to nearly 500 horsepower.

The CS offers more power, grip, and visual attitude while still acknowledging that it is, at its core, a street car.

Yet with a sticker price in excess of $150,000 and just 300 examples allotted for North America, the GTS model was frustratingly unobtainable for all but the most diehard (and well-heeled) BMW fanatics. And while the standard M4 has seen steady improvement since its debut in 2014, there’s still been a sizable gap between the base model M4 and the nearly-a-race-car M4 GTS.

The CS model – or Coupe Sport – seeks to bridge that gap. Limited to 3000 units worldwide, the CS brings more power, grip, and visual attitude to the table while still acknowledging that it is, at its core, a street car. 

Bradley Iger/Digital Trends

Interior and exterior design

The CS borrows from the GTS parts bin throughout, but the former stays closer to the standard model in terms of overall aesthetic. Yet even though you won’t find any big wings or candy-colored roll cages here, there still are a number of visual cues that make this model identifiable from a glance.

The CS’s domed and scooped hood is borrowed from the GTS, and as with the CS’s unique front splitter and rear spoiler, it’s made from light weight carbon fiber-reinforced plastic. New light weight forged wheels are part of the deal as well, measuring 19 inches in diameter up front and 20 at the rear, and they’re paired up with Michelin’s incredibly grippy Pilot Sport Cup 2 tire. The result is an M4 that doesn’t scream for attention like the GTS does, but ups the visual ante beyond the standard car a tangible degree.

The cabin sees some attention as well, with motorsport-inspired door cards from the GTS that ditch traditional door handles and arm rests in favor of minimalist outcroppings for the controls and pull straps to yank the door closed. That motorsport-inspired aesthetic carries over to the center console, which loses its storage and arm rest in favor of an alcantara-covered pad that runs along the transmission tunnel. Alcantara is a general theme here – you’ll find it on the steering wheel, dash inserts, seats, and elsewhere.

The result is a stark but sporty-looking interior that’s also a bit of a mixed message. While the aforementioned changes seem to have been done in the interest of weight savings and a general focus on track use, the CS also comes standard with a 12-speaker audio system, air conditioning, and heated seats. We can’t help but wonder if the inclusion of normal armrests would have been a worthwhile compromise, considering the liberties taken elsewhere in the name of creature comforts.

Tech features

While the M4 CS doesn’t have the GTS’s wild water-injection system, it’s still got a few tricks up its sleeve. The CS starts with the Competition Pack’s version of the M4’s 3.0-liter inline six cylinder and turns up the wick by way of a less restricted exhaust system as well as revisions to the engine management software, a combination that results in 454 horsepower and 442 pound-feet of torque.

While that’s only a gain of 10 ponies versus the Competition Pack engine, the additional 36 lb-ft give the CS noticeably more oomph off the line and when dipping into the throttle at low speeds. The exhaust tweaks also give the engine more personality, something that’s been a bit lacking since the M4’s debut.

Yet for every two steps the CS drives the M4 forward, it seems to take at least one step back. In terms of the powertrain, the seven-speed dual-clutch gearbox is the only transmission on offer with the CS. Those that want to row their own will have to look elsewhere in the M4 lineup.

As with the standard M4, infotainment tasks are handled by BMW’s iDrive system, here equipped with an 8.8-inch display that allows for user inputs through both the hard buttons and rotary knob on the center console as well as the touchscreen. Navigation with real-time traffic information is on hand, as is wireless Apple CarPlay, though the latter is subscription-based after a one-year trial.

Driving impressions

In many ways, the CS feels like the culmination of years spent tweaking and refining the M4 rather than a limited-production, track-focused brute. Sure there’s more noise and more grunt, but since the M4 Competition Pack’s suspension setup carries over unchanged to the CS, it’s fairly civilized around town (albeit substantially stiffer than a garden-variety 4-Series, even in the Comfort setting).

The steering, which has been justifiably knocked for feeling artificial and distant in the past, is worthy of praise, too. Now well-weighted in each of its settings, the additional response provided by the Cup 2 tires translates back to the steering wheel. It’s a similar story with the DCT as well, which has had a tendency to be unrefined and a bit harsh around town. While BMW’s dual clutch hasn’t completely shed those issues, they are significantly less distracting here than they have been in the past.

Though it’s tamer than the GTS, the M4 CS is still truly in its element when driven with purpose on a good road. In that context the lack of armrests is less of an annoyance because your hands are locked at 10 and 2 on the wheel, and the sport seats’ lack of lumbar support is forgivable because your seating position is configured to prioritize input control rather than comfort.

As with all M4s, the CS feels properly quick in a straight line, with meaty mid-ranged turbocharged pull. Although the engine tweaks aren’t transformative, the extra output is appreciated, and it’s put to good use with the abundance of mechanical grip on hand.

Our tester was outfitted with the M Carbon Ceramic Brake package, an $8150 option. We were impressed not only by the fade-free stopping power they provided, but also by the excellent pedal feel and relatively noise-free operation we experienced around town – a best case scenario for carbon ceramics that’s pretty hard to come by, making the hefty price tag for the option easier to swallow.

Rivals

The M4’s competitive set is normally comprised of cross-town rivals like the Audi RS5 and Mercedes-AMG C63 S. However, with a starting MSRP of $103,500 and an as-tested price of $112,795, the M4 CS finds itself in different company.

For that kind of money, you could consider track superstars like the Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE, which offers 650 horsepower, near-endless mechanical grip, and starts at $30,000 less than the BMW, though it lacks the aesthetic poise and cabin refinement found in the M4.

And at a starting price of $102,100, the Porsche 911 Carrera T is also a viable option. While down on horsepower versus the BMW, Porsche’s fit and finish is on par, and the 911’s chassis is arguably the best in the business. 

Peace of mind

BMW offers a four-year, 50,000 mile limited warranty on the M4 CS, along with four years of roadside assistance and a 12-year warranty for rust and corrosion issues.

The M4 CS is outfitted with driver and passenger front airbags as well as side-impact airbags for front seat occupants.

Our Take

Even though the asking price largely relegates the M4 CS to collectors and BMW fanatics, it illustrates that BMW still knows how to make an engaging intermediate sports coupe.

But for those of us who don’t prize exclusivity above all else, the compromises inherent to the CS model – namely the race car theater found in the cabin and the lack of manual gearbox availability – land this M4 frustratingly just short of greatness. We can’t help but wonder what a standard M4 would be like if some of this go-fast hardware made its way onto the options sheet without the caveats and the out-of-step price tag.

In the meantime, if you’ve got your heart set on a fast BMW, we’d recommend giving the excellent M2 Competition a spin at nearly half the price.

Bradley Iger
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Relocating to Los Angeles after competing his undergraduate degree in Rhetorical Studies at the University of California…
Tesla’s new Cybertruck trim goes low on price, high on range 
Tesla Cybertruck

Tesla has just introduced the most affordable variant of its Cybertruck in the US market. Carrying a sticker price worth $69,990, and dipping down to $62,490 with the federal tax credit applied, the new “Long Range” rear-wheel drive (RWD) model is quite an interesting package, in both good and odd ways. 

For starters, despite being the most affordable trim, it offers the highest per-charge mileage at 350 miles. The pricier All-Wheel Drive version delivers a range of 325 miles, while the top-of-the-line $99,990 Cyberbeast model can only muster 301 miles. 

Read more
Subaru’s electric comeback starts now: Trailseeker EV to debut in NYC
subaru trailseeker ev debut 2026 4  thumb

Subaru is finally accelerating into the EV fast lane. The automaker is officially teasing the 2026 Trailseeker, an all-new electric SUV set to debut at the New York International Auto Show next week. While details are still scarce, the Trailseeker marks Subaru’s long-awaited second entry into the EV space, joining the Solterra — and the expectations couldn't be higher.
The teaser image offers only a glimpse of the Trailseeker’s rear badge and taillight, but the name alone suggests rugged ambitions. It's a clear nod to Subaru’s outdoorsy heritage. But in the EV space, the outdoors belongs to brands like Rivian, whose upcoming R2 compact SUV is already turning heads. The Trailseeker is Subaru’s chance to reassert its identity in an electric age.
Currently, Subaru’s only EV is the Solterra, a joint venture with Toyota that shares a platform with the bZ4X. While the Solterra nails some Subaru essentials — all-wheel drive, spaciousness, and off-road capability — it falls short on key EV metrics. Reviewers have pointed to its modest 225-mile range, slow 100kW charging, and unremarkable acceleration, especially compared to rivals like the Hyundai Ioniq 5  or Ford Mustang Mach-E.
The hope is that Subaru has learned from these criticisms and is poised to deliver a more competitive product. The Trailseeker could either be a variation of a newer Toyota EV (possibly the next-gen C-HR+), or something entirely new under the shared platform strategy. Subaru previously announced that its next three EVs would be co-developed with Toyota, before launching four in-house EVs by 2028.
Given how long Subaru has waited to expand its EV offerings, the Trailseeker has to deliver. It's not just about adding a second electric model — it's about keeping pace with a market rapidly leaving legacy automakers behind. If the Trailseeker can improve on the Solterra's shortcomings and channel that classic Subaru ruggedness into a truly modern EV, it might just be the spark the brand needs.

Read more
EVs top gas cars in German reliability report — but one weak spot won’t quit
future electric cars 2021 volkswagen id4 official 32

Electric vehicles are quietly crushing old stereotypes about being delicate or unreliable, and the data now backs it up in a big way. According to Germany’s ADAC — Europe’s largest roadside assistance provider — EVs are actually more reliable than their internal combustion engine (ICE) counterparts. And this isn’t just a small study — it’s based on a staggering 3.6 million breakdowns in 2024 alone.
For cars registered between 2020 and 2022, EVs averaged just 4.2 breakdowns per 1,000 vehicles, while ICE cars saw more than double that, at 10.4 per 1,000. Even with more EVs hitting the road, they only accounted for 1.2% of total breakdowns — a big win for the battery-powered crowd.
Among standout performers, some cars delivered exceptionally low breakdown rates. The Audi A4 clocked in at just 0.4 breakdowns per 1,000 vehicles for 2022 models, with Tesla’s Model 3 right behind at 0.5. The Volkswagen ID.4, another popular EV, also impressed with a rate of 1.0 – as did the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross at 1.3. On the flip side, there were some major outliers: the Hyundai Ioniq 5 showed a surprisingly high 22.4 breakdowns per 1,000 vehicles for its 2022 models, while the hybrid Toyota RAV4 posted 18.4.
Interestingly, the most common issue for both EVs and ICE vehicles was exactly the same: the humble 12-volt battery. Despite all the futuristic tech in EVs, it’s this old-school component that causes 50% of all EV breakdowns, and 45% for gas-powered cars. Meanwhile, EVs shine in categories like engine management and electrical systems — areas where traditional engines are more complex and failure-prone.
But EVs aren’t completely flawless. They had a slightly higher rate of tire-related issues — 1.3 breakdowns per 1,000 vehicles compared to 0.9 for ICE cars. That could be due to their heavier weight and high torque, which can accelerate tire wear. Still, this trend is fading in newer EVs as tire tech and vehicle calibration improve.
Now, zooming out beyond Germany: a 2024 Consumer Reports study in the U.S. painted a different picture. It found that EVs, especially newer models, had more reliability issues than gas cars, citing tech glitches and inconsistent build quality. But it’s worth noting that the American data focused more on owner-reported problems, not just roadside breakdowns.
So, while the long-term story is still developing, especially for older EVs, Germany’s data suggests that when it comes to simply keeping you on the road, EVs are pulling ahead — quietly, efficiently, and with far fewer breakdowns than you might expect.

Read more