Skip to main content

With the rise of the self-driving car may come the decline of the traffic light

First they came for the drivers, and now, autonomous vehicles are going after traffic lights. The latest thing to be rendered obsolete (potentially) by the advent of self-driving technology are those pesky stop lights that seem to be the bane of every human driver’s existence. Thanks to a new proposal from MIT’s Senseable City Lab, the future of automotive navigation will utilize so-called “slot-based” intersections. Essentially, cars will automatically adjust their speed to arrive at crossings at a particular time, performing a choreographed traffic dance that should, in theory, eliminate the need for red, yellow, and green lights.

“When sensor-laden vehicles approach an intersection, they can communicate their presence and remain at a safe distance from each other, rather than grinding to a halt at traffic lights,” Carlo Ratti, director of the Senseable City Lab, told the Boston Globe in an email. “By removing the waits caused by traffic lights, slot-based intersections create a system that is much more efficient.”

Recommended Videos

With specifically designated times for each car to enter and exit an intersection, the MIT team believes that they have achieved an enormous improvement over the current system. By way of sensors, autonomous vehicles would communicate with other cars on the road, keeping a safe distance while detecting when it’s safe to move forward (and when they need to stop).

“Traffic intersections are particularly complex spaces, because you have two flows of traffic competing for the same piece of real estate,” Ratti added. “But a slot-based system moves the focus from the traffic flow level to the vehicle level.”

Not only is this new traffic mechanism expected to be more efficient in terms of time, but experts also note the beneficial side effects a slot-based intersection could have. Fuel emissions could be reduced by lessening the time cars have to spend braked at a light, and while this may not save you a lot of money on fuel, this could have a huge impact on a macro level. “This would make a contribution to the reduction of emissions and climate change,” Professor Dirk Helbing of the ETHZ told the Daily Mail. “Overall, people would benefit, the environment would benefit, and cities would become more livable.”

So get ready, friends. When you stop driving, you’ll might also stop stopping at traffic lights.

Lulu Chang
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
Waymo’s robotaxis are rolling into another U.S. city
A Waymo driverless car.

Waymo has been testing its driverless cars in Miami intermittently for the last five years, but now it’s making serious moves to launch a robotaxi service there.

The Alphabet-owned company revealed on Thursday that it’ll start testing its Jaguar I-PACE autonomous cars on the streets of the city early next year, with the aim of launching a robotaxi service for residents and visitors via the Waymo One app in 2026.

Read more
Self-driving vehicle rules set to loosen under Trump, report says
self driving looser rules trump screenshot 2024 10 at 54 56 pm 6708947b14810

Tesla “has been very clear the future is autonomous,” CEO Elon Musk said in October, shortly after unveiling the Cybercab, Tesla’s self-driving robotaxi.

It now seems that Musk, who was recently nominated to lead a newly-created "Department of Government Efficiency," is sharing his crystal ball with the incoming Trump administration.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more