Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Cars
  3. Evergreens

Tesla Model 3 Highland vs. Tesla Model Y Juniper: bigger or cheaper?

Add as a preferred source on Google
Blue Tesla Model Y Juniper in the snow
Christian de Looper / Digital Trends

There was once a time when Tesla was the new kid on the block, but these days it’s starting to age, with other companies like Rivian and Lucid taking that title. Perhaps that’s most proven by the fact that Tesla is now on its second generation of its so-called affordable EVs: the Tesla Model Y and the Tesla Model 3.

The big refresh of the Model 3, codenamed the Tesla Model 3 Highland, was launched early in 2024, with the Model Y’s refresh, codenamed the Tesla Model Y Juniper, having now been announced.

Recommended Videos

But which of the two cars is actually better? Or, if neither is better, which is right for your needs? We put the two head-to-head. Note, as you might have gathered by now, we’re comparing the refreshed iterations of these vehicles — however, at the time of this writing, the Model Y Juniper wasn’t available just yet in the U.S.

Design

Tesla uses a relatively uniform design language across its lineup of vehicles, and now that the Model Y has been refreshed, it looks a lot more like the current-generation Model 3. That said, there are some differences between the two vehicles, even apart from their sizes.

Tesla's Model 3 refresh, codenamed Highland, features a sleeker front.
Tesla

Sizes first though. The Model 3 is a sedan-sized vehicle measuring 185.8 inches long, 73 inches wide, and 56.7 inches high. It has an enclosed trunk like other sedans and is a bit lower to the ground than any crossover or SUV. The Model Y Juniper is a little larger than that in pretty much every direction. It measures 188.9 inches long, 75.6 inches wide, and 63.9 inches tall. On top of that, it ditches the enclosed trunk for a hatchback-style trunk, and it’s much more of a crossover-sized vehicle compared to the Model 3 sedan.

There are some other design differences, though. With the Highland refresh, Tesla gave the Model 3 much slimmer and slicker headlights, which aren’t quite as bulbous as they were before. That said, Tesla is taking a different approach for the Model Y Juniper. In place of two distinct headlights, the Model Y now has a long light bar that’s split into three sections, similar to that on the previously announced Tesla Cybercab.

Rear three quarters of the Tesla Model Y Juniper
Christian de Looper / Digital Trends

That trend continues on the back too. The Model 3 Highland has two separated tail lights, and while they have a new design compared to the previous generation Model 3, they’re not as revamped as the Model Y Juniper, which switches out distinct tail lights for a long light bar on the back. Regardless, both vehicles look pretty good, especially in their new, sleeker, and more modern lineups.

Ultimately, it’s hard to award one of these a “win” in the design category; it’s strictly a matter of preference.

Winner: Tie

Interior and tech

The interiors of the cars are also very similar. As you might expect, the Model Y, including the Model Y Juniper, has more interior space than the Model 3, which translates directly to more cargo space. Previous generations of the Model Y have offered another advantage to all that space: an option for seven seats. To be clear, the Model Y Juniper has only been announced as a five-seater for now, but we’re expecting a seven-seater configuration at some point in 2025, especially as the Model Y nears a U.S. release. In the previous-gen Model Y, that third row was a little cramped — but at least it was big enough to put a few kids.

Interior of the Tesla Model Y Juniper
Christian de Looper / Digital Trends

At the front of both cars, you’ll find a large tablet-style infotainment display, and the experience is the same regardless of the car you get. You’ll get Tesla’s reasonably well-designed infotainment system, which can show feeds from the numerous cameras around the car, mapping information, and more. Neither of the cars support Android Auto or CarPlay, unfortunately.

Both the Model 3 Highland and Model Y Juniper have some interior upgrades compared to their previous-generation models. Notably, they both offer more ambient lighting and a more seamless design that blends the dashboard into the door panels. They also provide a display for the second row passengers to control climate and even play games, though it is a smaller display.

The cars have the same overall interior experience, but the Model Y scores a win here by offering more space on the inside — plus hopefully at some point soon the Model Y Juniper will come as a three-row vehicle.

Winner: Tesla Model Y

Performance

The level of performance offered by the two vehicles is similar, though there are some details about the Model Y Juniper’s performance that we don’t know just yet. The base Model 3 is a rear-wheel drive vehicle, though there are two all-wheel drive variants in the form of the Model 3 Long Range All-Wheel Drive and the Model 3 Performance All-Wheel Drive. The base Model 3 can accelerate from 0 to 60 miles per hour in 4.9 seconds, while the Model 3 Performance gets up to speed in an incredibly impressive 2.9 seconds.

Tesla Model 3 Highland Front
Tesla

The Model Y Juniper will be available in RWD and AWD variants too. However, only two models have been announced so far. We are expecting a Model Y Performance to join the Juniper lineup down the line, but we don’t yet have details of what that might look like or even confirmation that it’s actually happening.

The numbers related to the Model Y performance are also a little off compared to the Model 3’s performance. This considers how fast it can accelerate to 100 kilometers per hour, or 62 mph. The base Model Y Juniper can get to 62mph in 6.6 seconds, while the AWD Model Y Juniper does so in 4.3 seconds.

Things might be a little different once a Model Y Performance is released, but for now, the Tesla Model 3 is a little quicker, likely due to its lighter weight.

Winner: Tesla Model 3

Range and charging

The range offered by the two vehicles is slightly different, and we don’t yet have EPA estimates for the Model Y Juniper.

The base version of the Model 3 Highland has the highest range, at 363 miles. The all-wheel drive version offers 346 miles, while the Model 3 Performance has a range of 298 miles.

As mentioned, we don’t yet have exact numbers for the Model Y when it comes to EPA estimates. Instead, we have numbers as tested by the China Light Duty Vehicle Test Cycle, or CLTC. Typically, CLTC numbers are higher than Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, numbers in the U.S., as the CLTC tests are a little less strict. According to the CLTC, the Model Y Juniper offers between 368 miles and 447 miles of range, depending on the battery size you get. Again, however, once the vehicle launches in the U.S., range estimates will likely be lower.

Tesla Supercharger
Tesla

While we can’t compare EPA estimates, we can at least compare CLTC estimates. In China, the base Model 3 has a 634 km (394 mile) range, while the Model 3 Long Range has a 713 km (443 mile) range. In other words, while the long-range variants of these two vehicles offer a similar range, the base variants are a little different, with the Model 3 having a better range. Of course, there’s no Model Y Performance to compare the Model 3 Performance to yet.

Both vehicles charge at 250kW, which is reasonably quick but not the fastest charging speed you can get right now, which is 350kW.

Given the fact that the base Model 3 has a better range than the base Model Y, it’s the winner here.

Winner: Tesla Model 3

Pricing and availability

Electric cars are still relatively expensive, but the Model 3 and Model Y are on the lower end of electric cars that are actually high-quality. The Model 3 starts at $42,490 for the base model, ranging up to $54,990 for the Model 3 Performance. We don’t yet have prices for the Model Y Juniper in the U.S., but we’re expecting it to come at a similar price to the previous generation Model Y, which is currently available at a base price of $44,990.

Technically, both a Model 3 and a Model Y are available in the U.S. right now, but if you want the Model Y Juniper, you’ll have to wait a little. That said, given that the Model 3 is cheaper than the Model Y, we’re giving it the win in this category.

Winner: Tesla Model 3

Overall winner: Tesla Model 3

There are a few things that make the Model 3 better in some ways than the Model Y, like the fact that it’s faster and has a higher range in the base model. That said, those differences are relatively minor for most buyers. The fact is that most customers should make their decision based on the size of the vehicle they want and, if they want a larger one, whether they can afford the higher price of the Model Y. In other words, most customers are deciding between smaller and cheaper, or bigger and more expensive. Unfortunately, that’s a subjective decision to make.

Christian de Looper
Christian de Looper is a long-time freelance writer who has covered every facet of the consumer tech and electric vehicle…
Topics
This sleek Chinese EV pairs supercar styling with three AI brains
The Xpeng L03 is an AI supercomputer disguised as a stylish family SUV
Xpeng L03

Xpeng’s latest electric vehicle carries enough processing power to make the term "smart car" actually sound more realistic than it actually is. The new Xpeng L03 debuted simultaneously in Europe and China on July 16, with the company presenting it across 65 markets. Available as a fully electric vehicle and an L03 Power X range-extender, the coupe-SUV is Xpeng’s most internationally focused model so far. Market-specific prices and sales dates remain unannounced.

Three AI chips and Google Maps built right in

Read more
A new sodium battery posts wild four-minute charging numbers, but don’t expect it in an EV yet
The breakthrough could improve fast charging and battery life, but the study hasn’t demonstrated those results in a production-sized pack
EV Charger

A new sodium-metal battery has posted a charging number that makes today’s EVs look painfully slow. In laboratory testing, the cell operated at a 15C rate, equivalent to completing a charge or discharge in roughly four minutes.

That doesn’t mean researchers plugged in an electric car and watched it fill up before the driver finished buying coffee. The result came from a small experimental cell using a new quasi-solid electrolyte, while the larger pouch-cell prototype delivered far less dramatic performance.

Read more
The Apple Car may be dead, but it became the foundation of Apple Intelligence
A decade of work on a canceled car project reportedly laid the groundwork for Apple Intelligence.
Apple Intelligence in Apple Car

The Apple Car may have never left the garage, but it apparently gave birth to Apple's AI ambitions. According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, Apple's canceled autonomous vehicle project, one that consumed more than a decade of work and over $10 billion before being scrapped in 2024, ended up laying the technological foundation for Apple Intelligence. In a rather ironic twist, one of Apple's most expensive failures may also become one of its most important long-term investments.

The Apple Car forced Apple to think like an AI company

Read more