Skip to main content

Waymo rules and Apple trails in California self-driving car benchmarks

Before they are let loose on public streets and highways, autonomous vehicles will need to prove their capability and safety. Absent a universal measure of self-driving technology performance, autonomous mode disengagement is the current benchmark. In self-driving operations, disengagement refers to any event when a human driver turns off (disengages) a vehicle’s autonomous mode to take control of the vehicle.

Each year the State of California Department of Motor Vehicles releases reports of self-driving car disengagements for all companies that tested autonomous vehicles on public roads. This year’s reports from 48 companies are included in the Autonomous Vehicle Disengagement Reports 2018.

Recommended Videos

Based on the most recent California data, Waymo had the lowest disengagement rate — the best performance — of all companies that reported. GM Cruise had the second best performance. Apple self-driving program, however, reported the highest rate of disengagements, trailing all other reporting companies.

California’s DMV doesn’t rate or grade autonomous vehicle company disengagement rates; it just reports the numbers provided. Based on those numbers, Apple’s self-driving test vehicles disengaged every 1.1 miles. GM Cruise reported disengagement every 5,204.9 miles, and Waymo more than doubled GM Cruise’s distance, driving a whopping 11,017 miles between disengagements.

The definition of disengagement is fuzzy. California’s DMV defines disengagement as “deactivation of the autonomous mode when a failure of the autonomous technology is detected or when the safe operation of the vehicle requires that the autonomous vehicle test driver disengage the autonomous mode and take immediate manual control of the vehicle,” according to The Robot Report.

Even if the definition of disengagement was airtight, however, is easy to find fault with the report’s validity when comparing companies. First off, the companies self-report, which opens questions of company interpretation, application, control, and enforcement.

Second, the reported total miles driven in each company’s testing revealed a huge range. Waymo’s test cars recorded 1,271,587 miles and GM Cruise’s autonomous test cars drove 447,621 miles in 2o18. Among other companies reporting, Mercedes-Benz vehicles drove 1,749 miles, Toyota 381 miles, Honda 168 miles, BMW 41 miles, and Telenav only 30 miles — the lowest of all companies. Comparing company technology based on hundreds of thousands and even more than a million miles with companies with just a few thousand miles or less defies logic. Apple didn’t put together a massive driving log, with 79,745 miles in 2018, the third highest miles driven, after Waymo and GM Cruise.

A quick look at the data might suggest that miles alone are the deciding factor in disengagement frequency, but that’s still not the whole story. Driver experience level, the types of roads traveled and the time of day and distance per trip could all affect the results, but the reported data lacks those levels of granularity.

Regardless of the actual validity of comparing the disengagement reports from various companies, distance traveled does affect data reliability — meaning how likely the same vehicles would perform in the same manner with more miles.

Waymo and GM Cruise continue their testing. Apple, however, always secretive about products and programs in development, recently laid off 200 employees from its mysterious Titan self-driving car program.

Bruce Brown
Bruce Brown Contributing Editor   As a Contributing Editor to the Auto teams at Digital Trends and TheManual.com, Bruce…
Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users
waymo data vulnerable road users ml still  1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
The UK’s Wayve brings its AI automated driving software to U.S. shores
wayve ai automated driving us driver assist2 1920x1152 1

It might seem that the autonomous driving trend is moving at full speed and on its own accord, especially if you live in California.Wayve, a UK startup that has received over $1 billion in funding, is now joining the crowded party by launching on-road testing of its AI learning system on the streets of San Francisco and the Bay Area.The announcement comes just weeks after Tesla unveiled its Robotaxi at the Warner Bros Studios in Burbank, California. It was also in San Francisco that an accident last year forced General Motors’ robotaxi service Cruise to stop its operations. And it’s mostly in California that Waymo, the only functioning robotaxi service in the U.S., first deployed its fleet of self-driving cars. As part of its move, Wayve opened a new office in Silicon Valley to support its U.S. expansion and AI development. Similarly to Tesla’s Full-Self Driving (FSD) software, the company says it’s using AI to provide automakers with a full range of driver assistance and automation features.“We are now testing our AI software in real-world environments across two continents,” said Alex Kendall, Wayve co-founder and CEO.The company has already conducted tests on UK roads since 2018. It received a huge boost earlier this year when it raised over $1 billion in a move led by Softbank and joined by Microsoft and Nvidia. In August, Uber also said it would invest to help the development of Wayve’s technology.Just like Tesla’s FSD, Wayve’s software provides an advanced driver assistance system that still requires driver supervision.Before driverless vehicles can legally hit the road, they must first pass strict safety tests.So far, Waymo’s technology, which relies on pre-mapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), is the only of its kind to have received the nod from U.S. regulators.

Read more