Skip to main content

Here’s why the USB port built into your car charges so agonizingly slow

There’s a USB port on the center console of my 2015 Mazda3, right beneath the stereo — it’s really well located. Get in the car, plug in your cell phone, turn the key (well, push the button) and you’re off.

I complain about that stupid USB port every time I get in the car

That’s how it should work, anyway.

In reality the port is useless: It supplies about half an amp of charging power – far less than I need to juice my phone. If I start using the GPS while driving the power depletes even faster. I may as well not charge the phone at all.

For reference, the travel adapter I’m using with the amazing Galaxy S8 delivers 2.0 amps, as does Samsung’s wireless charger. The S7 had similar power requirements. Even the Galaxy S6 adapter put out 0.7A a couple years ago.

I complain about that stupid USB port every time I get in the car (my wife loves travelling with me these days). But Mazda is hardly alone here. According to mobile accessory maker Ventev, most cars have USB ports that are insufficient for our needs.

“The USB ports in your car seem like a convenient feature, but often don’t provide enough power to charge your device while using it. Instead, they often only slow the speed at which your battery drains — your phone will use power faster than the car USB port can supply it,” the company wrote in a recent blog post. Car manufacturers are beginning to install higher powered USB ports inside vehicles, Ventev added, but the instances are fairly rare. “The only exception we know of is one Acura model that advertises 2.4 amps in its USB ports, which would charge your phone just fine.”

A phone plugged into a USB port in a car — USB Car Charger Hardly Works
Image used with permission by copyright holder

How-to Geek confirmed that finding: “We measured multiple vehicles with a USB voltage/amperage meter and found that the data port in the dash (commonly used to hook up a USB drive or phone to play music) offered a very weak 0.5A output. While that’s enough to power your USB drive full of MP3s, it’s barely enough to trickle charge an iPhone and maintain the current battery level—if you’re using the phone for navigation, a notorious battery hog, it’s unlikely you’ll even charge it faster than it drains.”

USB ports designed for data transfer are passably utilitarian, I suppose – or were, a decade ago when I had a USB stick with all of my MP3 files on it. (Yes, I used MP3s back in the day, not FLAC files. I have no regrets!) But today’s phones do so much more, and few modern music listeners rely on MP3, thanks to the rise of streaming music. So why on Earth do car makers make it so hard for us?

The ports in my car don’t even supply enough current to charge my phone at rest

I needed answers, so I put the question directly to Mazda: Watts up? (Sorry.) Why wouldn’t you design this port with sufficient power? Isn’t phone charging a pretty basic use case here? Do you hate me?

The company confirmed that its port supplies just 500mA of current – and pointed out that it does exactly what it’s supposed to do.

“The official international charging/power output specification for USB 1.0 and 2.0 devices is 500mA of current,” explained Mazda’s HMI and infotainment engineer Matthew Valbuena. “Mazda Connect utilizes the USB 2.0 specification and as such, our system provides 500mA of charging current on each USB port.”

Valbuena also noted that when an Apple device is connected, the USB port will provide 1A of current (as required by Apple certification – weird, right?).

Image used with permission by copyright holder

“At rest, the system should provide enough current to charge the Galaxy S8, but if the phone is being actively used (navigation, Bluetooth audio streaming, calling, etc.) the Mazda Connect USB ports will not be able to sufficiently charge the S8’s battery to overcome the drain that the phone’s processes are incurring,” he added.

Frankly, the ports in my car don’t even supply enough current to charge my phone at rest, regardless of what the engineers think.

The issue is, Mazda and most other car makers rely on a specification finalized in April of 2000 that’s clearly insufficient for modern needs. Dig deeper and you’ll learn about addendums and extensions to the USB 2.0 spec made over the years by the group that controls it, the USB Implementers Forum.

Of particular note is Battery Charging Specification 1.2, released in 2010, which created a distinction between standard ports for transferring info and what it calls “Charging Ports,” allowing devices connected to such ports to suck up to 1.5 amps (and mandates that they can handle even higher currents). So Mazda is technically correct, but come on – gimme a charging port!

Anyone with a computer will note that there’s a newer solution of course, which has the same ability to charge our stuff and boosted transfer speeds to boot.

But keep in mind that USB 3.0 was dreamed up before the modern era too — 2008 to be exact. And since we rely on our smartphones these days for, well, everything Valbuena listed earlier, an aftermarket car charger is almost a requirement of car ownership. Where can you plug it in to get the energy your gadgets so desperately crave?

Say it with me: the cigarette lighter.

The de facto electrical connector in your car is the 12 Volt cigarette lighter (here’s a few of the best chargers we’ve found), which feels almost exactly like digging in the closet for the projector to show off slides of your latest cruise. Cigarette lighters are old news. It’s 2017. Can’t we do better? High-powered USB ports are a step in the right direction, but I’m hoping to find an inductive charging panel or bucket in the center console of my next ride.

Cigarette lighters are old news. It’s 2017. Can’t we do better?

GM offers wireless charging on a handful of cars, notably the 2016 and newer GMC Sierra, Yukon, and Yukon XL, but the panel works only with a handful of phones — and notably NOT with the Galaxy S7, S8, Note 5, and 7. Apple users are out of luck, too. The iPhone 6 Plus and 7 Plus are too big, the company warns. So … yeah, choose your phone wisely, I guess.

Other companies are on board the inductive charging bandwagon as well, including Toyota, which includes it as an option in the 2017 Toyota Prius Prime.

Are decent charging and wireless charging must-have features? Not yet. But is it something I think of every time I plug in my cell phone to the cigarette lighter in my car? You’re damn right it is.

Jeremy Kaplan
As Editor in Chief, Jeremy Kaplan transformed Digital Trends from a niche publisher into one of the fastest growing…
Slate Unveils $20K Electric Truck That Transforms Into an SUV
slate 20k ev blank  roller 1 web

Slate Automotive, a new American EV startup, has just unveiled its first vehicle: a radically minimalist electric truck that can convert into a five-seat SUV. Dubbed the “Blank Slate,” the EV made its debut this week, instantly turning heads not just for its versatility but for its incredibly low price—starting under $20,000 after federal tax incentives.

Unlike Tesla and Lucid, which launched with high-priced luxury models, Slate wants to flip the model: start cheap, scale up.
At its core, the Slate Truck is a utilitarian, two-seat electric pickup designed for simplicity and affordability. But what sets it apart is its transformative potential. Thanks to a modular accessory system, the truck can be upgraded over time—including a kit that adds a rear seat, roll cage, airbags, and SUV body panels. This means buyers can start with a minimalist pickup and evolve it into a family-friendly SUV—either themselves or through Slate’s growing network of service partners.
Customization is central to Slate’s vision. Owners will be able to choose from over 100 accessories at launch, ranging from vinyl wraps and Bluetooth-ready audio systems to larger battery packs and off-road upgrades. The company encourages a DIY approach, offering tools and tutorials through “Slate University” to empower users to modify and maintain their own vehicles.
Powering the truck is a 52.7-kWh battery for up to 150 miles of range, or an optional 84.3-kWh pack targeting 240 miles. Fast-charging capabilities and Tesla’s NACS port come standard. The vehicle is rear-wheel-drive and delivers around 200 horsepower—enough for urban commuting and light-duty hauling.
What enables the low price is Slate’s stripped-down approach to manufacturing. There’s no paint shop, no stamping, and only one trim level—everything else is modular. The vehicle features steel wheels, crank windows, and a rugged plastic body designed to take a beating and still look good. It’s a rejection of the tech-saturated, high-cost vehicles dominating today’s market.
Despite the minimalist specs, Slate isn’t skimping on safety. The truck is engineered to meet top crash test ratings and comes equipped with up to eight airbags, active emergency braking, and forward collision warning.
Backing this ambitious approach is significant investor support—including Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos. That backing, combined with a simplified production model, positions Slate to scale quickly once production begins in 2026.
Reservations are now open for $50 at slate.auto, with deliveries expected in late 2026. Whether Americans are ready for a stripped-down, shape-shifting EV remains to be seen, but Slate’s bet on affordability and customization could make it one of the most disruptive entries in the EV market to date.

Read more
Waymo and Toyota explore personally owned self-driving cars
Front three quarter view of the 2023 Toyota bZ4X.

Waymo and Toyota have announced they’re exploring a strategic collaboration—and one of the most exciting possibilities on the table is bringing fully-automated driving technology to personally owned vehicles.
Alphabet-owned Waymo has made its name with its robotaxi service, the only one currently operating in the U.S. Its vehicles, including Jaguars and Hyundai Ioniq 5s, have logged tens of millions of autonomous miles on the streets of San Francisco, Los Angeles, Phoenix, and Austin.
But shifting to personally owned self-driving cars is a much more complex challenge.
While safety regulations are expected to loosen under the Trump administration, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has so far taken a cautious approach to the deployment of fully autonomous vehicles. General Motors-backed Cruise robotaxi was forced to suspend operations in 2023 following a fatal collision.
While the partnership with Toyota is still in the early stages, Waymo says it will initially study how to merge its autonomous systems with the Japanese automaker’s consumer vehicle platforms.
In a recent call with analysts, Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai signaled that Waymo is seriously considering expanding beyond ride-hailing fleets and into personal ownership. While nothing is confirmed, the partnership with Toyota adds credibility—and manufacturing muscle—to that vision.
Toyota brings decades of safety innovation to the table, including its widely adopted Toyota Safety Sense technology. Through its software division, Woven by Toyota, the company is also pushing into next-generation vehicle platforms. With Waymo, Toyota is now also looking at how automation can evolve beyond assisted driving and into full autonomy for individual drivers.
This move also turns up the heat on Tesla, which has long promised fully self-driving vehicles for consumers. While Tesla continues to refine its Full Self-Driving (FSD) software, it remains supervised and hasn’t yet delivered on full autonomy. CEO Elon Musk is promising to launch some of its first robotaxis in Austin in June.
When it comes to self-driving cars, Waymo and Tesla are taking very different roads. Tesla aims to deliver affordability and scale with its camera, AI-based software. Waymo, by contrast, uses a more expensive technology relying on pre-mapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar and lidar (a laser-light radar), that regulators have been quicker to trust.

Read more
Aston Martin DBX S is the world’s most powerful SUV, if you ignore electric
Aston Martin DBX S

British brand Aston Martin has unveiled what it is the most powerful non-electrified SUV on the market in the DBX S. The new flagship SUV blends the dynamism of the DBX 707 with engine enhancements derived from the Valhalla supercar, to deliver what the company is promising to be a more engaging drive through increased power, reduced weight, and a more assertive design.

The DBX S continues Aston Martin’s tradition of using the ‘S’ suffix to denote higher-performance versions of existing models – something it first did back in 2004 with the Vanquish S. 

Read more