Skip to main content

AMD, Nvidia Attack Intel on USB 3.0

AMD, Nvidia Attack Intel on USB 3.0

Chipmakers AMD, Nvidia, and Via Technologies—and, reportedly, other companies as well—are apparently tired of waiting for a USB 3.0 spec to be finalized, and are threatening to go off on their own with an alternate USB 3.0 system in order to bring the technology to market faster. The companies apparently believe Intel is holding back the USB 3.0 specification in order to get a jump in the pending market, and is refusing to share the spec with competitors. Not wanting to be left behind, AMD and others are preparing to start work on their own USB 3.0 implementation…and the result could be a marketplace fractured by similar but not-quite-compatible devices.

Nvidia and AMD both declined to comment officially on their position regarding Intel and the USB 3.0 spec, but industry reports have initial meetings for generating a so-called "open" USB 3.0 specification are set for next week.

The USB 3.0 spec is designed to be backward compatible with existing USB connectors, but offer about 5 gigabits per second of bandwidth—that’s about ten times what today’s USB 2.0 connections offer.

For its part, Intel is engaged in active spin control, with Intel’s Nick Knuffler offering a public post to "dispell the myths" about the company’s role in forming the USB 3.0 spec. Knuffler correctly points out that Intel is just one company in the larger USB 3.0 Promoter Group which is creating the USB 3.0 spec: other members incude HP, Microsoft, NEC, and Texas Instruments—with AMD and Nvidia both on board as "contributor" companies. The spec is due to be completed in the second half of 2008.

Separately, Intel is also developing its own host controller specification, which the company maintains is separate from the USB 3.0 specification itself. The host controller spec is a guide to creating actual silicon that supports USB 3.0: Intel says it plans to release the controller spec when it’s completed (probably in the second half of 2008) and make it freely available, just as it did with Wireless USB, USB 2.0, and USB 1.1. Intel concedes anybody can decide to create a USB 3.0 host controller specification, but they’d have to throw "gazillions of dollars and bazillions of man hours" into it—just like Intel. Intel doesn’t want to distribute an unfinished spec, and can’t be sure everything is nailed down until the actual USB 3.0 spec is finalized. So, Intel isn’t yet sharing its USB host controller spec with the world—and that’s making other companies antsy.

However, from the perspective of Intel’s competitors, the lack of a host controller spec—even in preliminary form—means that Intel will have several months head start on the USB 3.0 market once the specification is finalized. They’re not interested in playing catch-up with Intel: they want to be competitive as soon as USB 3.0 hits the street.

USB 3.0 devices are expected to begin reaching consumers in 2009.

Editors' Recommendations

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Here’s a shocking reminder of just how far ahead Intel is in race with AMD
Intel Core i5-14600K processor inside its socket.

It's no secret that between Intel and AMD, it's Intel that holds the majority of the market -- but a recent market analysis report really highlights just how much Intel beats both AMD and Apple. While both Intel and AMD make some of the best CPUs, and Apple has its own excellent proprietary silicon, Intel's CPU shipments trump them both. The report tells us that Intel controls a whopping 78% of the PC processor market.

The information comes from Canalys, a PC industry research firm. It's worth noting that it excludes tablets, which would have bumped up Apple's numbers a bit, as well as Qualcomm's. But zooming in on the PC CPU market alone, including desktops and laptops, tells a different story. The research shows a 78% market share for Intel and 13% for AMD, while Apple accounts for about 8% or slightly more. The rest belongs to MediaTek, Qualcomm, and ARM.

Read more
AMD vs. Intel: the rivalry has never been more fierce
An AMD Ryzen 7000 processor slotted into a motherboard.

If you’re building your own PC, there’s plenty of criteria to consider when molding your machine. What operating system do you plan on using? What graphics card will be best for gaming? And where exactly can one buy all these components? There’s a lot to think about, but one important decision you can’t forget is whether you’ll be using an AMD or Intel processor for your new machine.

A war of chips and cores that shows no sign of stopping, the age-old battle of AMD vs Intel is a classic competition, but is one processor brand better than the other? That’s where we come in. 

Read more
The best processors in 2024: AMD and Intel CPUs duke it out
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D installed in a motherboard.

AMD and Intel have fought for supremacy for decades, duking it out in a bid to make the best processors you can buy. The competition is fierce, and that's a great thing for PC enthusiasts. In 2024, the list of the best CPUs is larger than ever and packed with options from Team Red and Team Blue.

Intel's bang-for-the-buck king of this generation is the 14600K, but its last-gen flagship the 13900K is still well worth considering. If you're a gamer though, the 7800X3D should be the top of your list. Here's a rundown of those chips and a whole lot more.

Read more