Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Features

AMD’s last-gen CPU is still the king of gaming

Add as a preferred source on Google
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D held between fingertips.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

AMD’s new Ryzen 7 9700X is an impressive chip, there’s no doubt about that. It’s among the best processors you can buy, with a massive boost to single-core performance and exceptional efficiency. Up against the undisputed best CPU for gaming, AMD’s legendary Ryzen 7 7800X3D, the latest eight-core chip from AMD struggles to keep up, though.

As you can read in our Ryzen 7 9700X review, AMD’s latest chip is impressive. However, with the Ryzen 7 7800X3D dropping in price, it’s become much more competitive. And when it comes to gaming, AMD is really competing with itself.

Recommended Videos

Specs

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X installed in a motherboard.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

The specs for the Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 7 7800X3D are deceptive. It doesn’t look like there are a ton of differences, and in areas where there are differences, they don’t make as significant of a difference as you might believe. These are two eight-core CPUs based on the AM5 platform, but they couldn’t be more different.

First, the cache situation. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D utilizes AMD’s 3D V-Cache technology, leading to a significant boost in L3 cache. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D has three times as much L3 cache as the Ryzen 7 9700X, and that makes a huge difference in games.

Ryzen 7 9700X Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Cores/Threads 8/16 8/16
L3/L2 Cache 32MB / 8MB 96MB / 8MB
Max turbo frequency 5.5GHz 5GHz
TDP 65W 120W
Recommended price $360 $450

The other interesting point of contention is power. The Ryzen 7 9700X is more efficient, and it’s capped at 65 watts in its default power mode. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D, on the other hand, has a power rating of 120W. In practice, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D rarely gets up to 120W, and it often runs closer to 80W. In addition, the Ryzen 7 9700X has struggled to run at its maximum boost clock of 5.5GHz with the default power settings.

Outside of the raw specs, there’s an architectural difference here. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses the Zen 4 architecture, while the Ryzen 7 9700X uses the new Zen 5 architecture. In addition to a smaller manufacturing process, AMD improved single-core performance with Zen 5, as well as implemented a 512-bit data path for AVX-512 instructions. The big hurdle for AMD’s new architecture is multi-core performance. With the same core counts as the previous generation, the multi-core boost isn’t as big as you’d expect out of a typical generation.

A strange pricing situation

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D installed in a motherboard.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

The Ryzen 7 9700X is cheaper than the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, at least on paper. AMD’s latest comes in at $359, and the first retail listings are holding steady at that price. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D launched at $450, but you won’t find it for that price today. At the time of writing, it’s available for $366, putting it in direct competition with the Ryzen 7 9700X.

Given the popularity of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, its price isn’t exactly stable. In the past few months, we’ve actually seen it selling for more than the 12-core Ryzen 9 7900X3D, which should be more expensive. The price fluctuates, but it currently lands somewhere between $350 and $400. We wouldn’t recommend spending more than $400 for it right now as it sells for less so often.

Although things could change as the Ryzen 7 9700X settles into the market, the two CPUs are around the same price right now. You might spend $10 or $20 more on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, but that’s hardly swaying a buying decision when you’re talking about two CPUs north of $300.

Productivity performance

Performance of the Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 7 7800X3D in Cinebench.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

There isn’t much of a contest between the Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 7 7800X3D when it comes to productivity performance, and you can see that in action right away in Cinebench R23 above. In single-core performance, the Ryzen 7 9700X leads by around 20%, while it shoots ahead by about 11% in multi-core performance. Part of that can be attributed to the new architecture of the Ryzen 7 9700X, as well as the higher clock speeds.

Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Ryzen 7 9700X performance in Handbrake.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

Breaking into real applications, the Ryzen 7 9700X once again claims a lead in Handbrake. It was able to complete the x265 transcode 14% faster than the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Once again, higher clock speeds and a new architecture help the Ryzen 7 9700X here. Meanwhile, the extra cache on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D isn’t doing much in these types of applications.

Performance of the Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 7 7800X3D in Blender 3.4.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

Rounding out these rendering tests, the Ryzen 7 9700X leads once again in Blender. For these core-crunching workloads, it’s hard to debate that the Ryzen 7 9700X shows a significant edge.

Performance for the Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 7 7800X3D in Photoshop.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

Productivity workloads aren’t always pushing cores to their limit, though, and Photoshop is a good example of that. The Ryzen 7 9700X is ahead, but not by enough for it to make a difference. With these lighter productivity workloads — particularly those that bring in your GPU like Photoshop — the difference between the Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 7 7800X3D shrinks.

Outside of raw performance, there’s another aspect of productivity performance to consider here — overclocking. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D isn’t unlocked for manual overclocking, and it doesn’t have much headroom in the first place. The Ryzen 7 9700X, on the other hand, is unlocked and has quite a bit of headroom for overclocking.

Gaming performance

Performance of the Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 7 7800X3D in games.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

Gaming completely flips the script on the dynamic between the Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 7 7800X3D. You can see that immediately in my gaming results above. There are a couple of cases where the Ryzen 7 9700X squeezes out a lead, such as in Tiny Tina’s Wonderlands and Red Dead Redemption 2. But the leads are marginal at best, and they fall completely flat compared to the titles where the Ryzen 7 7800X3D shoots ahead.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a gaming monster. There are some smaller advantages, such as in Final Fantasy 14 Dawntrail. But in titles like Hitman 3, Far Cry 6, and F1 2022, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is in a completely different performance class. In games that don’t need the extra cache, the Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 7 7800X3D are on the same level. In games that benefit from the extra cache, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is clearly ahead.

Performance of the Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 7 7800X3D in LeelaChessZero.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

There’s one small exception, and that’s AVX-512 instructions. Leela Chess Zero is an AI chess engine that can leverage AVX-512 instructions, and the Ryzen 7 9700X absolutely dominates with its dedicated 512-bit data path. AVX-512 doesn’t come up a lot, but it can make a world of difference in some applications, such as emulating PlayStation 3 games.

For the gamers

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

The Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 7 7800X3D serve very different purposes, but for most people, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the CPU to buy. It trades some productivity performance for a massive boost in gaming performance, and it offers a much better value considering that lead. You’re also much more likely to find the Ryzen 7 7800X3D on sale considering its been on the market for a few years.

That doesn’t mean the Ryzen 7 9700X is bad. It’s a solid performer, and a good option if you’re not concerned with gaming. We would only recommend the Ryzen 7 9700X if you aren’t playing games at all, though. Even if you have a mix of productivity and gaming workloads, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the better choice.

Buy at Best Buy U.S.
Jacob Roach
Former Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
Humans actually prefer talking to an AI than a support person, says gas giant as it cuts jobs
British Gas cuts 1,300 support jobs as its CEO points to changing customer habits
Executive, Person, Electronics

Centrica, owner of British Gas, is cutting 1,300 call centre jobs, and its chief executive says changing customer behaviour is the main reason. The company plans to remove 800 roles as part of a “targeted deployment of AI tools,” on top of the 500 cuts announced last month. Customer service teams in Glasgow, Edinburgh, Cardiff, Leicester, Stockport, and Leeds will be affected over the next two years.

Some positions will disappear when employees leave and are not replaced, while the remaining cuts will come through redundancies. Trade unions have warned that Centrica’s AI investment will hand hundreds of human jobs to chatbots.

Read more
Intel just pulled its 14A production schedule forward by a year
Risk production for 14A is now planned for late 2027
Intel Core Ultra Desktop CPU

Intel has moved up the schedule for its next-generation 14A (1.4-nanometer) manufacturing process, giving its foundry turnaround an important new target.

During Intel’s Q2 2026 earnings call, CEO Lip-Bu Tan said 14A risk production for internal products is now planned for the second half of 2027. High-volume production is expected to begin in 2028. This is earlier than the previous timeline, when Intel was expected to begin risk production in 2028 and move to volume production in 2029.

Read more
Gemini Spark is no longer restricted to Google’s priciest Ultra tier
US subscribers on the $20 Pro plan can now try the AI agent, with a wider rollout expected soon.
Gemini Spark mac app

Google AI Pro subscribers are finally getting access to one of the best features Google announced at I/O this May. Gemini Spark is rolling out to US users on the Pro tier, according to a recent post from the official Google Gemini account on X, with other countries expected to follow soon.

Gemini Spark handles tasks while you're away

Read more