AMD may be sticking to a controversial choice with Ryzen 8000

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D installed in a motherboard.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

Zen 4 still feels quite new, but AMD is already preparing to launch its Zen 5 architecture in 2024, with AMD Ryzen 8000 processors now on the horizon.

New leaks shed some light on the upcoming chips, and while a lot is still uncertain, one thing is clear — AMD is sticking to a somewhat controversial design choice that sets it apart from Intel: keeping the same core counts.

Recommended Videos

It’s worth noting that it’s not a surprise to hear that AMD Ryzen 8000 “Granite Ridge” chips are already well into their production cycle. According to the scoop shared by Moore’s Law Is Dead, AMD may be readying for launch in the last quarter of 2024. However, a lot still remains unclear when it comes to this generation of chips.

Moore’s Law Is Dead / YouTube Moore's Law Is Dead

The slide that Moore’s Law Is Dead showed in its latest video refers to Granite Ridge in the context of AMD’s server road map, so it’s hard to tell whether these are consumer chips or not. On the other hand, that doesn’t exclude the fact that AMD might be working on both types of chips.

There appear to be more similarities between Zen 4 and Zen 5 than some might have expected. For one, as stated earlier, the upcoming CPUs are said to come with the same core counts as Zen 4, meaning a maximum of 16 cores. This is an interesting choice that definitely varies from what Intel is doing these days, which is chasing higher core counts.

Similarly, the thermal design power (TDP) for the Zen 5 CPUs is said to range between 65 watts and 170 watts. As per TechRadar, these specs could give us an up to 10% to 15% increase in frequency while maintaining the power consumption of Zen 4.

Wccftech reports that this should be an embedded lineup, meaning that the chips would be integrated directly onto the motherboard, with no chance of swapping or upgrading. However, it also points out that they should also feature support on a socketed platform — so the regular consumer-level CPU hope lives on. In fact, the desktop CPU family is said to be launching way ahead of the embedded chips.

As for the architecture, rumor has it that AMD may be switching to TSMC’s 3nm process node, although 4nm is still possible. In any case, the Zen 5 cores are to be code-named Nirvana. It seems that AMD is heavily targeting a balance between performance and efficiency as opposed to pushing for raw numbers the way Intel sometimes does in some of its top CPUs.

While the decision to keep the same core counts is controversial to some, AMD seems to be gearing up for serious upgrades in Zen 5, including a redesigned cache and improved AI capabilities. With the launch predicted to be over a year away, it’ll be a while before we can know anything for certain.

Editors' Recommendations

Monica is a UK-based freelance writer and self-proclaimed geek. A firm believer in the "PC building is just like expensive…
AMD vs. Intel: the rivalry has never been more fierce

If you’re building your own PC, there’s plenty of criteria to consider when molding your machine. What operating system do you plan on using? What graphics card will be best for gaming? And where exactly can one buy all these components? There’s a lot to think about, but one important decision you can’t forget is whether you’ll be using an AMD or Intel processor for your new machine.

A war of chips and cores that shows no sign of stopping, the age-old battle of AMD vs Intel is a classic competition, but is one processor brand better than the other? That’s where we come in. 

Read more
AMD’s new CPU slammed as ‘anti-consumer at best’

AMD makes some of the best processors, but this one is most likely not one of them. According to a video review of the recently released Ryzen 7 5700, the CPU is not only a letdown -- it's downright misleading. Compared to previous non-X Ryzen processors, the 5700 appears to be significantly cutdown, which affects its performance in a big way.

Historically, AMD's non-X Ryzen CPUs were pretty much the same as their X counterparts, but with slightly lower clock speeds. Take the Ryzen 5 5600 and the Ryzen 5 5600X, for example. Both chips have six cores and 12 threads, as well as 32MB of cache, but the Ryzen 5 5600 has a clock speed of 4.4GHz, while the 5600X hits 4.6GHz. As a result, many chose the non-X part due to it being slightly cheaper while not being a major downgrade.

Read more
AMD still hasn’t made the big APU dream a reality

I could barely contain my excitement when AMD announced its Ryzen 8000G APUs. It was a return to form, offering the latest in AMD's CPU and GPU architectures in a single package for a low price. More than that, there was hope that these would be the first APUs to allow for some serious PC gaming without the need to spend loads of cash on one of the best graphics cards.

But after testing them and looking at the other options, I'm not convinced this is the best starting point for aspiring PC gamers.

Read more