This decision by the court is noteworthy since it is opposed to the European Union’s protections for E-Commerce, which as Ars points out, “guarantees liability protection from intermediaries,” as long as they implement a notice-takedown system.
This ruling has divided commentators, with some suggesting that this is the beginning of the end of web freedoms, since it provides a precedent for other cases, while others believe this is a happy middle ground, where the site simply didn’t take enough action to delete the comments. It’s a difficult line that needs to be toed by everyone involved, ourselves included.
The real problem with any decisions like the one taken by the EUCHR, is that whether sites should bear some responsibility or not, enforcing it is difficult. Reported comments can be investigated, but on what scale? Should administrators merely miss a post that is deemed offensive or hateful, is negligence as punishable as allowing that content to be posted in the first place?
Fortunately for those concerned, the European Court of Human Rights has limited legal jurisdiction. Its ruling in this case cannot be used to change national or international law. It may be cited by lawyers, though, and the fact that this ruling was reached by many of the court’s 47 member states hints at the climate of opinion in the region.
