Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Mobile
  4. Social Media
  5. Web
  6. News

NSA surveillance operations come to screeching halt as Senate stalls on resolution

Add as a preferred source on Google

Finally, a situation where the Senate disagreeing on everything actually helps the American public for once.

Over the weekend, a controversial amendment in the PATRIOT Act known as Section 215 was allowed to lapse past its due date for renewal on June 1st. This means that at least for the next couple days, the NSA will have lost its legal right to spy on the telephone conversations of domestic citizens.

Recommended Videos

The renewal was stalled by the proposal of a new bill, dubbed the USA Freedom Act, which seeks to place increased limitations on the ruling guidelines for surveillance originally established in the Patriot Act. It also fundamentally alters the way certain permissions are doled out to the NSA by the legislative branch of our government.

In its current form, the USA Freedom Act would put a slew of restrictions on specific tenets of the NSA’s bulk phone record collection operations, and hand much of that responsibility over to the cellphone carriers such as Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile instead. The bill is still imperfect however, as while the amount of regulations on the NSA’s power to spy on cellphones would be increased, many of the other programs that Edward Snowden exposed in his leaks would also be renewed without edits at the same time.

The bill does little (if anything) to curb the permissions that the NSA’s secret FISA courts used to establish surveillance over the internet, such as MUSCULAR, PRISM, and XKeyscore. For the time being, our computers are will remain just as vulnerable as they were when the PATRIOT Act first went into effect.

The Republican Senator from Kentucky, Rand Paul, was the one to block the motion to put the passage of the USA Freedom Act up to a vote, which means that the NSA isn’t allowed to make a move until told otherwise. The Act has had its ups and downs since first being proposed in the House of Representatives last October, and has garnered both praise and disdain from both sides of the aisle over the many revisions and changes we’ve seen added and subtracted since then.

Chris Stobing
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Self-proclaimed geek and nerd extraordinaire, Chris Stobing is a writer and blogger from the heart of Silicon Valley. Raised…
Gemini Notebook’s latest update makes it a better study companion
Google is adding voice conversations, lecture recording, interactive quizzes, and short video overviews to its AI-powered notebook.
Gemini Notebook update for students

Google is giving Gemini Notebook, formerly NotebookLM, a major upgrade for students, adding new features designed to help them understand difficult concepts, capture lectures, and turn study materials into interactive learning tools. The update lands alongside a free year of Google's paid AI plan for eligible college students.

Gemini Notebook can now talk you through your notes

Read more
LG 39GX950B review: An ultrawide OLED that gets remarkably close to having it all
LG’s 39-inch 5K2K OLED combines high-end picture quality with seriously fast gaming
Electronics, Screen, Computer Hardware

see at bestbuy

Quick Verdict

Read more
Should we feel bad about deleting an AI? One expert says it’s time to find out
If AI can learn, remember, and make increasingly complex decisions, one expert thinks we should be more careful about how we say goodbye.
an on off toggle

Turning off an AI might sound as simple as hitting a switch, but according to futurist and University of Technology Sydney professor Rocky Scopelliti, that mindset needs to change fast. As first reported by TechXplore, Scopelliti's new book, The Conscious Code, Scopelliti argues that as AI systems get better at reflecting on their own choices, deleting them without a second thought could actually cause harm.

He's not asking us to hand robots legal rights. Instead, he wants us to accept what he calls a duty of good stewardship, basically treating AI responsibly because we're the ones holding the power, not because the AI is demanding it. As he puts it, our design choices can quietly cause damage by wiping out an AI's "learned moral dispositions" without warning.

Read more