Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Intel continues to fight European Commission’s $1.2B fine from 2009

Add as a preferred source on Google

In recent years, the European Commission has been coming down hard on U.S. tech giants with antitrust fines, but Intel is continuing its fight over a 2009 ruling made against it.

In the original ruling, the commission, which is the executive arm of the EU, ruled that Intel had abused its position as a dominant chipmaker by offering rebates to PC makers and retailers from 2002 to 2005 that would lower retail prices.

Recommended Videos

Ultimately, Intel was fined a record 1.06 billion euros ($1.2 billion U.S.) for allegedly pushing out its competitors, namely AMD, with these tactics.

Now, the company is continuing its long-running opposition to the fine with a new appeal that challenges the legitimacy of the commission’s ruling. The first appeal from two years ago was rejected.

Intel counsel Daniel Beard claimed this week in the European Union’s Court of Justice that the ruling did not consider “all relevant circumstances” of Intel’s rebate program. As a result, he said, it did not thoroughly investigate whether Intel rivals were truly put at an unfair disadvantage.

At the heart of the commission’s antitrust case against Intel is whether a company as big as Intel, with a considerably large market share than competitors, can hold certain commercial partnerships with the likes of Dell, Lenovo, and PC retailers.

These kinds of strategies can lead to “the marginalization or even the elimination of its only competitor,” said Nicholas Khan, a lawyer for the European Commission.

“By undermining its competitors’ ability to compete on the merits of their products, Intel’s actions undermined competition and innovation,” stated the ruling handed down in 2009.

Intel is one of many technology corporations butting heads with the European Commission over antitrust proceedings. The body has also been investigating Google for allegedly abusing its position in the search market and Qualcomm for allegedly paying original equipment manufacturers to include its chips in smartphones and tablets.

Intel’s fine in 2009 was staggering at the time but it’s since been topped by the commission’s $3 billion fine of Google last month.

Jonathan Keane
Jonathan is a freelance technology journalist living in Dublin, Ireland. He's previously written for publications and sites…
Meta’s detection tool fails to identify photos generated by its own Muse Image AI
Meta has created an invisible watermarking tool called Content Seal that is embedded in all images generated by the Muse Image AI.
Meta AI identification tool.

Earlier this week, Meta announced two new AI products, namely, Muse Image and Muse Video. As the name suggests, these are generative AI tools for making photos and video clips using natural language text prompts. Soon after their rollout commenced, these tools sparked controversy because Meta had automatically opted in Instagram users, allowing others to use their publicly posted media and convert them into remixed AI content. But it appears that Meta courted another loss on its side of the court.

What's the problem?

Read more
Your Google AI Studio apps can finally have polished, presentable web links
AI Studio web apps can now use personalized subdomains
google ai studio logos

Google AI Studio has made building a web app surprisingly easy. You can describe what you want, refine the design through prompts, and publish the result without setting up a traditional development environment. An awkward point of friction comes after deployment, when the finished app still has to live behind a long, forgettable Cloud Run link.

Google is now cleaning up that final step. AI Studio lets you assign a deployed web app a personalized address under the “ai.studio” domain, such as “your-app-name.ai.studio.” A recognizable URL should make the project look more presentable in a portfolio, client demo, social post, or internal project page.

Read more
You can now check if a Google ad was made using AI
Google will auto-label its own AI ads, but third-party AI ads still rely on advertisers to come clean.
google-ads-ai-label

Ever looked at an ad and wondered if a real person made it or if it was AI generated in seconds? Google is now giving you a way to find out.

The company just announced a new AI transparency label that tells you whether an ad was created or edited using generative AI tools. The label lives inside Google's My Ad Center, and it is rolling out across Google Search, YouTube, and Discover globally.

Read more