Skip to main content

Lawmakers urge ICANN to delay new top-level domains

ICANN

Several members of the House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce have asked the International Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) to delay the planned rollout of new top-level domain policies scheduled for January 12, 2012 (PDF). Although the letter doesn’t spell out specific reasons, the representatives asking for a “short delay” to work out “significant uncertainty” about the new top-level domains process for consumers and non-profits, as well as businesses.

Adopted last summer, ICANN’s adopted a new policy for top-level domains, or gTLDS, for Generic Top Level Domains. Currently, there are only a couple dozen gTLDs—things like .com, .org—alongside a few hundred country codes like .jp that aren’t “generic.” In theory, the new wide-open gTLD application process enables virtually any term or name to be registered as a top-level domain, subject to three criteria: applicants have to establish a legitimate claim to the term to be used as a gTLD, they must be an “established public or private organization,” and most groups would have to fork over $185,000 to get the top-level domain approved. The application process is scheduled to launch next month.

Although the new gTLD plan will no doubt do a great deal to increase competition amongst registrars and site operators, the plan has also drawn criticism from major businesses and non-profits concerned about protecting their established brands—after all, it could be a marketing disaster if an organization besides The Coca-Cola Company were to be the first to register .coke—and for companies and organizations that have hundreds (or thousands) of brands and trademarks, protecting their online identities under the new system could be prohibitively expensive—especially once the inevitable lawsuits get started. Business, schools, and non-profits have already had to register their names and trademarks in other top-level domains (like .xxx)—even if they have no intention of using them—just to prevent abuse, scams, and fraud from being carried out using their name.

ICANN is implementing a rapid review process that including taking down infringing gTLDs, enables trademark holders to protect their marks without buying the corresponding gTLDs themselves, along with new dispute resolution procedures and applicant checks that ICANN hopes will weed out fraudstars and cybersquatters. ICANN also plans to prohibit registration of new gTLDs using provocative social or religious terms.

However, the lawmakers signing the letter to ICANN cite organizations like Goodwill Industries, the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, and the Council of Better Business Bureaus support a delay, and have “suggested changes” that could alleviate their concerns.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
VeriSign: Internet has almost 210 million domains
Verisign Top-Level Domain Registrations

The Internet may have run out of IPv4 address space earlier this year, but that doesn't seem to have put any damper on the worldwide market for Internet domains. According to a new Domain Name Industry Brief from VeriSign (PDF) at the end of the first quarter of 2011 the total number of top-level domains registered around the world was over 209.8 million, an increase of 4.5 million (or 2.2 percent) over the fourth quarter alone. Overall, domain registrations grew by 7.9 percent (15.3 million) during the last year.

For the year, the ten largest top-level domains in order were .com, .de, .net, .uk, .org, .info, .nl, .eu, .cn, and .ru. Although there are more than 240 top-level domains in use around the world, some 61 percent of all registrations in the last year were in those top ten domains.

Read more
It’s official: ICANN approves .xxx

After years of debate, ICANN has finally given .xxx the go ahead. It will now be recognized as a top level domain and pornographic sites will retain their own customized URL signifier. According to the Washington Post, the vote was split and the final ruling actually contradicted the board’s Government Advisory Committee, which fought the action.

“We are disappointed that ICANN ignored the clear advice of governments worldwide, including the US. This decision goes against the global public interest, and it will open the door to more Internet blocking by governments and undermine the stability and security of the Internet,” assistant commerce secretary Lawrence Strickling said. Critics have long worried that the domain will cause conservative and censorship-prone nations to block .xxx sites, and purveyors of adult-themed material fear that the specific domain will separate porn from the rest of the Internet, giving it a certain stigma. Porn industry members are outraged, and one even announced during the meetings that the .xxx domain is “a very real threat to free speech and to my particular freedom simply because I want to create art in my own way.”

Read more
Report: ICANN may approve .xxx domain as early as tomorrow
xxx domains back on the table domain

It's been a long time coming. But the fight over an adult-oriented domain suffix may be nearing an end. Politico has reported that the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the organization in charge of approving and assigning the .com and .net suffixes, may approve the .xxx domain as early as Friday. ICANN is currently in the midst of a week-long meeting in San Francisco.

The idea for the porn-friendly domain suffix was first introduced by ICM Registry in 2005. But after religious groups launched protests, the Bush administration put the approval process on ice. In 2007, ICANN formally rejected ICM's request (again), which prompted ICM to file a suit. ICANN's decision was overturned, opening the door for ICM to press for the .xxx domain yet again.

Read more