Universities buying .xxx domains to keep their brands porn-free

By Andrew Couts November 14, 2011

porn.xxx.domain.university.shutterstock

In an attempt to protect their brands from enterprising pornographers and cybersquatters, a number of universities have begun purchasing .xxx top level domains, reports the St. Louis Dispatch. The move will hopefully prevent the school from being associated in any way with sex-laden content.

“We don’t want someone coming across our trademark on a porn site. God only knows what they’d come up with,” said Terry Robb, director of information technology at the University of Missouri-Columbia, which has purchased both the missouri.xxx and missouritigers.xxx domains.

Washington University, another St. Louis school, has also taken precautions, having purchased the washu.xxx, washingtonuniversity.xxx and wustl.xxx domains. Each .xxx domain costs about $200 to register. In none of the reported cases so far will any of the .xxx domains purchased by universities actually point to any websites.

The .xxx top level domain was approved in March by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), which regulates what can and cannot become a top level domain.

Having foreseen the inevitable problem of cybersquatters, ICM Registry, the company that controls the .xxx top level domain, has banned the registration of .xxx domains that include the names of more than 4,000 well-known celebrities, like Angelina Jolie, Donald Trump and Beyonce. Some governmental and child protection agencies have also been blocked, by request.

ICM chief executive Stuart Lawley says he expects his company will sell more than 500,000 .xxx domains by early next year, mostly to the adult entertainment industry.

[Image via Jeff Thrower/Shutterstock]

Editors' Recommendations

Former Digital Trends Contributor

Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…

Web

Google Search police strike again, send ‘cc.co’ domains into oblivion

As we all know by now, Google Search is not a beast to be tampered with. Its Panda update and reissue struck more than fear into websites everywhere, it also sent them into the black hole of the Internet. While there’s something to be said for good intentions (and Google attempting to rid your search results of spam sites and content farms is a noble cause), the search algorithm tweaks have failed to universally boost good sites and banish bad ones. There’s the exception here and there (eHow has reportedly lost a significant amount of traffic), but far too many sites publishing original content have been swept into the no-man’s-land that is page 10 and on of Google Search.
Now a whole host of domains are about to feel this pain, but for good reason. According to The Register, Google has buried some 11 million URLs that end with “co.cc.” Apparently, the domain is tightly associated with spam sites and phishing attacks. In this case, Google may have a point: Co.cc is independently owned by a Korean company and is not officially authorized second-level domain name, and in 2010 nearly 5,000 phishing attacks could be traced back to co.cc URLs. The company offers two domains for free, and also allows buyers to register 15,000 domains for $1,000. It doesn’t take a genius to see this is a hotbed for spammers.
Of course, the Cocos Islands, which reside off the coast of Australia, use the top-level .cc domain, which won’t be affected by Google’s latest anti-spam efforts.
Google head of search Matt Cutts recently posted on Google+ that Google retains all control over what it promotes and bans from search. “We absolutely do try to be granular, but I wanted to mention that if we see a very large fraction of sites on a specific freehost by spammy or low-quality, we do reserve the right to take action on the freehost as a whole.”
Using its search powers to protect users from sites that want to take advantage of them is one thing – blocking results because of preference another. Striking that balance, however, continues to be a difficult line for Google to tread. Some are becoming borderline cynical of Google Search results, or on the other hand, wanting Google to crackdown even more. A few users' personal sites were wiped out with the co.cc elimination as well. Others replied to Cutt's post question, asking why .biz hasn't received the same treatment as co.cc. Others completely disagree, saying Google is abusing its power and that a variety of spam sites can be traced to Blogspot, a Google web property (which also received a boost thanks to the Panda update).
Blogspot (or Blogger) has been an area of contention since the Panda update. The site was aided by the algorithm adjustment, despite its increasing position as a platform for content farms and that fact that blogs in general seriously suffered at the hand of Panda. And scraper sites will just catch on, switching to Blogspot (shortly to become Google Blogs) and enjoying the page rank boost a la Google. Which, of course, will lead to yet another algorithm tweak, and then webmasters will once again scour their sites, trying to find what exactly Google is rewarding or punishing them for. We know that updating how search results are yielded is a necessary evil, but it makes it difficult to then put our blind trust in Google when it expels a URL from the Internet -- even when it seems like there is nothing but just cause.
Google holds the keys to a lot of information, and ultimately is able to decide what we access. Making that decision isn't easy, and the more reliant on the Web we become, the more implications there are to each algorithm tweak.

Computing

ICANN approves new top-level domains: Now .anything is possible

ICANN-new-domain-names-TLD

In the most significant change to domain name regulations since the institution of .com, the Board of ICANN, the body that regulates how domain names work, has approved the creation of new generic top-level domains (gTLDs) that will allow for a near-infinite variety of new website addresses. The colossal decision not only enables corporations and other organizations to create domains like drink.coke or buy.apple, but they could theoretically create .almost .anything .they .can .think .of.
"ICANN has opened the Internet's addressing system to the limitless possibilities of the human imagination. No one can predict where this historic decision will take us," said Rod Beckstrom, President and chief executive of ICANN in a statement.
"Today's decision will usher in a new Internet age," said Peter Dengate Thrush, chairman of ICANN's Board of Directors told reporters. "We have provided a platform for creativity and inspiration, and for the next big dot-thing."
Despite these claims of grandeur, three massive barriers will hold back the onrush of new domains. First, the price: new custom domain available through the program will cost $185,000 to register. Second, those seeking to acquire one of these new domains must prove legitimacy to their claim of the terms they want to use in their web address. Third, only "established public or private organizations" can apply. And those that do must prove that they have the technological infrastructure to support the domain.
Some domain applications may be discarded for other reasons, said Dengate Thrush. For instance, if the domain could infringe on religious or social sensitivities, like .nazi, then ICANN will not approve the creation of the domain.
Currently, a mere 22 gTLDs exist — things like .com, .org, .net or .gov — as well as about 250 country-level domains, like .uk or .cn. ICANN expects between 300 and 1000 new domains to come into existence as a result of the new program.
Organizations who seek a '.anything' domain may send in applications as soon as January 2012, through April 2012. ICANN anticipates that the first new domains will be approved by the end of 2012.
(Image via)

Computing

US government wants veto power on new domain suffixes

In the midst the forthcoming rampant expansion of the Internet, the US government will look to gain veto power over future domain name suffixes. Numerous additions, like .car, .movie, and .web, could be officially introduced next month. But before any new top level generic Top Level Domains (gTLDs) are allowed into our address bars, ICANN’s international representatives have to sign off on them.

Until now, ICANN’s policy for gTLD applications were only rejected based on its Limited Public Interest Objection rule, which simply mean that unless a proposed gTLD offended the “generally accepted legal norms of morality and public order that are recognized under principles of international law,” it passed.