Skip to main content

Don’t waste any gaming space with Maingear’s newest X-Cube PC, which is powerful and tiny

Maingear’s X-Cube PCs have always impressed with their combination of style, performance, and portability. Now, the tiny gaming systems are sleeker, faster, and easier to customize than ever before. They’re better in every single way, and can still squeeze into the tightest of spaces.

Measuring 12.5 x 10 x 15.5-inches, the upgraded line of desktop PCs packs an incredible punch for its Lilliputian size. The X-Cubes aren’t fitted with Intel’s newest, slim Core M Broadwell processors, but that’s due to reasons which are rooted in power.

Recommended Videos

They do support Haswell chips up to the 3GHz Intel Core i7-5960x, ensuring that gamers will have all the processing horsepower that they could need. As if that weren’t enough to prove the X-Cube means business, the graphics card options should do the job.

You can opt for a dual graphics card system touting either Nvidia’s top-shelf GeForce GTX 980, or AMD’s mouth-watering Radeon R9 290x. If you can afford it, there’s also support for up to 64GB of Corsair Dominator memory, and three hard drives.

It goes without saying the refreshed X-Cubes runs Windows 8.1 out the box. However, for an extra $55, you can opt for Windows 7 instead.

Despite its cramped size, the system holds a pair of USB 3.0 ports and audio jacks on the front for easy access. Plus, you’ll find an additional four USB 3.0 connectors, and six USB 2.0 ports on the rear. Now that’s a lot of connectivity.

802.11ac Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, and Gigabit Ethernet are also offered standard. On the subject of cooling, Maingear promises the moon, but we’ll need to take an X-Cube for a quick spin to see exactly how hot it gets.

We all know that cooling is often a problem with workhorses of this nature. But the optional Epic 120 or Epic 240 CPU cooler should quietly and elegantly take care of business. Designed to save space while turning a few heads, the upgraded X-Cube lights up like Christmas trees on command.

They can be moved around pretty effortlessly as well, tipping the scales at just 20 pounds. That’s nothing compared to the 61-pound Alienware Area 51.

The X-Cube isn’t even particularly pricey, starting at $799. Granted, for $800, you won’t get a very high end configuration. That will cost you at least twice as much.

It’s worth noting that, while Maingear informed us the X-Cube measures 12.5 x 10 x 15.5-inches, the rig’s official page indicates that it instead measures 16.3 x 13.1 x 18-inches. We will reach out to Maingear about this discrepancy, and we will update this story accordingly if we obtain more information.

Adrian Diaconescu
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Adrian is a mobile aficionado since the days of the Nokia 3310, and a PC enthusiast since Windows 98. Later, he discovered…
The simple reasons your PC games don’t play as well as they should
The HP Omen 40L desktop sitting on a coffee table.

Whether you have the best gaming desktop money can buy or a budget-oriented PC, the whole point of it all is to be able to play your favorite games and make them look nice and run great. Not every gamer cares about visuals, but performance matters, and getting your money's worth out of your PC is important, too.

If a PC performs poorly in games, many of us immediately assume that the hardware is to blame. Sure, that can often be the case, but before you start looking into ways to upgrade your computer, try out these solutions that might solve your problem and let you get back to high-quality gaming.
PC settings
Whether you're dealing with poor performance, such as stuttering and low frames per second (fps), or you're simply unhappy with how your games look, the root of the problem might lie in the settings of your PC -- and as such, it could be an easy fix.

Read more
Don’t believe the hype — the era of native resolution gaming isn’t over
Alan Wake looking at a projection of himself.

Native resolution is dead, or so the story goes. A string of PC games released this year, with the most recent being Alan Wake 2, have come under fire for basically requiring some form of upscaling to achieve decent performance. Understandably, there's been some backlash from PC gamers, who feel as if the idea of running a game at native resolution is quickly becoming a bygone era.

There's some truth to that, but the idea that games will rely on half-baked upscalers to achieve reasonable performance instead of "optimization" is misguided at best -- and downright inaccurate at worst. Tools like Nvidia's Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) and AMD's FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) will continue to be a cornerstone of PC gaming, but here's why they can't replace native resolution entirely.
The outcry
Let's start with why PC gamers have the impression that native resolution is dead. The most recent outcry came over Alan Wake 2 when the system requirements revealed that the game was built around having either DLSS or FSR turned on. That's not a new scenario, either. The developers of Remnant 2 confirmed the game was designed around upscaling, and you'd be hard-pressed to find a AAA release in the last few years that didn't pack in upscaling tech.

Read more
The surprising reason your powerful PC still can’t handle the latest games
Nvidia's RTX 3070 Ti graphics card.

We're off to a rocky start with PC releases in 2023. Hogwarts Legacy, Resident Evil 4 Remake, Forspoken, and most recently and notably The Last of Us Part One have all launched in dire states, with crashes, hitches, and lower performance despite a minor increase in visual quality. And a big reason why is that the graphics cards of the last few years aren't equipped to handle the demands of games today.

The GPUs themselves are powerful enough; games haven't suddenly gotten more demanding for no reason. The problem is video memory or VRAM. Many of the most powerful GPUs from the previous generation weren't set up to handle the VRAM demands of modern games, which may explain why your relatively powerful PC can't handle the latest and most exciting new games.
What does your VRAM do anyway?

Read more