Skip to main content

Linux is now beating Windows on Microsoft’s own turf, and Azure is better for it

A Linux kernel developer working with Microsoft has let slip that Linux-based operating systems have a larger presence on Microsoft’s Azure cloud platform than Windows-based ones. The revelation appeared on an Openwall open-source security list in an application for Microsoft developers to join the list, and was apparently part of an evidently credible argument that Microsoft plays an active-enough role in Linux development to merit including the company in security groups.

The overwhelming prevalence of Linux on Microsoft’s cloud platform may come as a surprise when viewed in isolation, but it makes complete sense from a business perspective. To start with, it’s simply cheaper to run Linux on Azure, as Microsoft’s own price calculator illustrates as clear as day. In this respect, Microsoft basically forced its own hand in terms of monetizing OS licensing into a consistent revenue stream, since Windows 10 Home is essentially free (if you don’t count the “Windows tax“) and Windows 10 Pro works out to a one-and-done revenue opportunity with many enterprise customers.

The fact that Linux conforms closely (enough) to the Unix structure and philosophy also makes Linux instances easier to manage. Because Unix is so prolific, basically any system administrator will instantly be at home in the Linux file system, and the saved time and headaches translate pretty quickly into saved dollars and cents, not to mention fewer complications posed by downtime.

Linux’s dominance also fits perfectly in the context of its gradual, deliberate integration into Microsoft’s long-term development and innovation vision. When Microsoft first proclaimed its love for Linux in 2014, many industry professionals, especially in the open-source sphere, were skeptical, but from that point on, Linux has been rolling steadily ahead at Microsoft. Initially, Microsoft’s embrace of Linux manifested as the Windows Subsystem for Linux, a curiosity mostly aimed at developers.

Last year, though, the company announced Azure Sphere, a cloud-connected platform for internet of things (IoT) devices which includes Azure Sphere OS, an in-house headless Linux-based operating system. This was a masterstroke for Microsoft — even a stripped-down Windows OS is far too bloated to run on practically any IoT device, but most IoT manufacturers could benefit from a secure, off-the-shelf IoT solution to replace their own ill-conceived attempts. Azure Sphere was designed specifically to fill this void.

Taken together, it’s easy to see how the numerous Linux options Microsoft offers on Azure alone — to say nothing of the deeper integration Linux is getting on the Windows 10 desktop — outflanks the comparatively more limited options and higher cost associated with running Windows on Azure. At the rate at which the company finds new and inventive applications for Linux, this trend looks set to continue, and Microsoft seems just fine with that.

Updated on July 15, 2019: Revised with additional information from Microsoft regarding Azure Sphere.

Editors' Recommendations

Jonathan Terrasi
Jonathan has studiously followed trends in technology, particularly in information security and digital privacy, since 2014…
Microsoft takes Windows 10 Mobile updates into its own hands
Microsoft Lumia 640

If you don't enjoy the wait for mobile OS updates to reach your handset, there's some good news coming out of Redmond this weekend. Microsoft says it will be managing Windows 10 Mobile updates itself, bypassing the network carriers and taking an iOS-style approach to software upgrades.

That means you won't have to wait for AT&T (or whoever else) to issue your phone update, because they'll all get them direct from Microsoft at the same time. Patches and upgrades on Microsoft mobiles will start to be applied just like Windows updates are on desktops and laptops.

Read more
Microsoft Developer Evangelist claims Windows 10 will be the last version of the OS
microsoft build 2015 preview windows 10 start menu

It's no secret that Microsoft is going all out with Windows 10 — the very fact that it's expected to be offered up for free for the first year demonstrates just how focused the company is on getting the new version of the operating system installed on as many devices as possible. Now, we might know a little bit more about the reasoning behind this strategy.
Save $20 on Ultimate Help Desk service for Win10 transitions. MSRP $99.99
Speaking at the Ignite conference this week, Microsoft Developer Evangelist Jerry Nixon made the claim that Windows 10 will be 'the last version of Windows', according to a report from Softpedia. It seems that the schedule we see Windows iterated upon is set to change rather drastically.

Rather than new versions every few years, it's thought that Microsoft will deliver sizeable updates on a more regular basis. It doesn't sound too far removed from the strategy and schedule that the company employs with its Xbox gaming consoles.

Read more
Cut the ribbon: Why Microsoft needs a fresh start with Windows 8
cut the ribbon why microsoft needs a fresh start with windows 8 carousel

In June, Microsoft showed us a new vision for its old operating system. Windows 8 debuted with a completely overhauled interface, promising to be touch-friendly and to revolutionize personal computing, bridging the divide between the world of smartphones, tablets, laptops, and our old friend, the desktop PC.
The new interface (learn about it here) was introduced as the future of Windows computing, but with no compromises. Microsoft told us that the next version of the OS, though completely new, would come with a compatibility mode that would allow Windows 7-like applications run as well. This seemed odd, as Windows 7 and the Live Tiled Windows 8 couldn't be more different, but in the name of backward compatibility, legacy applications, and Photoshop, such a compromise seemed acceptable. After all, who says you have to make a complete break with the past to move forward?
Unfortunately, by giving Microsoft an inch, we may have just granted it a mile. In the last two weeks, Windows 8 lead, Steven Sinofsky, has been blogging about the new operating system, writing lengthy posts about new features and changes to the feature teams that make Windows. The problem: There have been eight posts now and not one of them discusses the new interface. Every post so far has discussed small, incremental tweaks to the Windows 7 interface. Microsoft is making changes to things like USB support, copying and pasting, file name collisions, and the way buttons look when you open up a folder window. What's wrong with improvements, you ask? Well, nothing would be wrong with them if it was 2008 and Microsoft was discussing its new Windows 7 operating system, but it's 2011 and the "compatibility" mode of Windows 8 is beginning to look like it is Windows 8. Why is Microsoft putting so much time into building out obscure features like accessing VHD files in an interface that is supposed to be on the outs? The innovative new Live Tile interface is beginning to look like its the minor player. It will be nice for some touch tablets, but not even Microsoft is standing behind Live Tiles as a serious replacement for Windows 7.
Instead of working toward marrying the overly complicated truck of an OS that is Windows 7 with the compact Windows 8 Live Tile Start screen, the company looks like its developing a Live Tile setup that may be too simple, and a classic Windows mode that's becoming more complex than ever. Microsoft is going to extremes where it should be making compromises. What's the deal?
Microsoft got their fresh start and we picked out the best Windows phones that show off the new Windows 8 platform.
Making Windows even more complicated
In a recent post, Sinofsky details why the company has decided to integrate the "Ribbon UI" from Microsoft Office 2007 into the Windows 8. I don't have a problem with the Ribbon UI in Microsoft Office. It didn't really improve the Office experience much for me, but it did not harm it either. Adding the Ribbon UI to the basic explorer would harm Windows, and is a sign that Microsoft isn't afraid to make Windows 8 more complicated than Windows 7. The basic file Explorer (file & folder window) does not need to be transformed into a big, thick, four-tab, 100-button Ribbon UI experience.
Windows 7 Explorer

Proposed Windows 8 Explorer

Read more