Skip to main content

AMD’s Radeon RX 480 may be too powerful for its own good

Digital Trends recently had the opportunity to review AMD’s new budget-friendly RX 480, and we loved it for offering 1440p performance at a very reasonable price point. What we didn’t test was the card’s power draw, at least at the level of detail that a few sites, specifically PC Perspective and Tom’s Hardware, did.

Both reviewers engineered setups to test the exact power delivered to the video card itself — rather than what’s delivered to the test rig overall. And both reviewers found the RX 480 slightly exceeds its target TDP. In doing so, the card may exceed the limits of the PCI Express specification.

Recommended Videos

The RX 480, like most GPUs, pulls power from two different places. The first is through its own PCIe slot, which the PCIe specification rate at up to 75 watts. Some cards use less power than that, and don’t require any additional connections. The RX 480 has a 150 watt total TDP, so it should theoretically pull the other 75 watts from its six-pin PCIe power connection. Both of those connections are specified for a maximum of 75 watts. Yet, in certain situations, the card’s power draw can exceed 150 watts — and thus the limits of one or both power connections.

Tom’s Hardware and PC Perspective discovered power readings that reached 160 watts while playing Metro: Last Light in 4K. Overclocking only exacerbated the issue. Once again, both sites reported peaks of 200 watts, and consistent power draw over 150 watts. Tom’s Hardware even skipped long-term overclocking testing for fear it might damage their test rig.

Pulling more than 75 watts from the PCIe connection to the power supply isn’t a huge deal. The cables and PSU are often rated for much higher loads than that. The motherboard is another story. PC Perspective reached out to a motherboard company to find out just how bad the situation was.

“One vendor told me directly that while spikes as high as 95 watts of power draw through the PCIE connection are tolerated without issue, sustained power draw at that kind of level would likely cause damage,” wrote Ryan Shrout, owner of PC Perspective.

Raja Koduri from Radeon actually responded to a question about the high power draw during a Reddit AMA on launch day. “We have extensive testing internally on our PCIE compliance and RX480 passed our testing. However we have received feedback from some of the reviewers on high current observed on PCIe in some cases. We are looking into these scenarios as we speak to reproduce these scenarios internally. Our engineering team is fully engaged.”

Robert Hallock, from Radeon’s Technical Marketing group, also chimed in to try and contextualize the issue. “We will have more on this topic soon as we investigate, but it’s worth reminding people that only a very small number of hundreds of RX 480 reviews worldwide encountered this issue. Clearly that makes it aberrant, rather than the rule, and we’re working to get that number down to zero.”

What does this mean for you? Very little, under normal circumstances. A Radeon RX 480 running at stock clock speeds is very unlikely to harm your motherboard, even if it does technically exceed specifications under certain loads.

However, the RX 480 launched with a new driver featured called Wattman that’s specifically designed to make it easier for users to overclock the card. If they do, they’ll further increase power draw — perhaps to levels that could be cause for concern.

At this point, though, no one has reported a RX 480 frying a motherboard. There are a lot of variables to consider. We’ll update this post as the situation shakes out.

Brad Bourque
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Brad Bourque is a native Portlander, devout nerd, and craft beer enthusiast. He studied creative writing at Willamette…
AMD’s RX 9070 XT could soon cost a lot more than it does now
An Asus RX 9070 XT TUF GPU.

After the way Nvidia's RTX 50-series ended up being called a "paper launch," many breathed a sigh of relief when AMD's RX 9000 series appeared on the shelves in much larger quantities. However, once this initial shipment is sold, AMD could face the same problem as the rest of the best graphics cards: Price hikes, price hikes everywhere.

The cards officially hit the shelves yesterday, and many were spotted far above the recommended list price (MSRP), with some overclocked models priced at up to $250 more than the $600 starting price. However, AMD spoke several times about working with its partners to ensure wide availability at MSRP, and indeed, many retailers had some models up for sale. Those MSRP cards were only around for a short time, though, and they might never come back, according to retailers.

Read more
Not this again — AMD’s RX 9070 XT may cost up to $250 more than MSRP
Gigabyte's RX 9070 XT GPU.

AMD is joining the battle against some of Nvidia's best graphics cards. The RX 9070 XT and its non-XT counterpart should now (hopefully) start flooding the shelves, and gamers are hoping to see them at their recommended list price (MSRP). Unfortunately, some models may cost up to $250 more from the get-go, which is similar to all of Nvidia's recent RTX 50-series releases where the GPUs cost much more than they should.

Although the cards aren't technically up for sale just yet, Best Buy seems to have plenty of RX 9070 XT and non-XT models listed -- they're just marked as "coming soon."

Read more
An AMD RX 9060 XT with 16GB would ruin Nvidia’s second-hand market
Several AMD RX 9000 series graphics cards.

I know, I know we're all hopped up about the RX 9070 XT and 9070 launch -- I know I am. But looking beyond the potential big win AMD is on for with its first RDNA4 graphics cards, I'm also particularly excited about the potential for the rumored 9060 XT. Not because it'll be cheaper again -- it will be -- but because it might have up to 16GB of VRAM. That's going to wreck Nvidia's long-term second-hand card market, which could have a much greater impact on AMD's market share over the long term.

It's all just rumors for now, and some of my colleagues are much less excited by this than I am, but I think there's some real potential here for this little card to be a game changer.
Hitting the VRAM wall
Video memory, or VRAM, has been a front-and centre feature of graphics card spec sheets for generations, but it's started to matter a lot more in recent years. While flagship graphics cards have exploded in their VRAM quantities, with the 5090 now offering 32GB, most mainstream cards have been getting by with less. It was only a couple of generations ago that the flagship RTX 3080 only had 10GB of VRAM, and outside of the top few models, you'll still see 12GB, 10GB, or even 8GB.

Read more