Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Web
  4. News

Unknown hacker infects malware with anti-virus program

Add as a preferred source on Google

How does that old expression go? If you can’t beat them, join them? Although perhaps the best outcome is when you can beat them by joining them. That’s what one unnamed white-hat hacker did in the case of the Dridex online banking Trojan virus. Unsuspecting victims of that nasty piece of malware have found themselves with a brand new anti-virus install instead of having their banking details stolen.

Dridex is a Trojan that’s been commonplace in email inboxes for the past few years and is one of the top three pieces of phishing malware in terms of utilization. Authorities have been looking to shut it down for some time and in 2015 even managed to catch someone who may be responsible for it — but the Trojan is still out there, causing damage.

Recommended Videos

Except it’s doing a lot less of it now, as whoever was behind the white-hat hack was able to crack into the Dridex distribution servers and replace the malicious files with a full installer of the latest version of Avira anti-virus. Now when some are infected, instead of having their keystrokes recorded and their banking searches injected with malicious code, they get an anti-virus install.

Of course there is still a chance that this is all a ruse. Avira isn’t behind the move, so some have suggested that the files being sent out are still malicious in nature, but are at this time just attempting to trick people into trusting Avira or being less careful with what they install.

“We still don’t know exactly who is doing this with our installer and why, but we have some theories,” said Moritz Kroll, a malware expert at Avira (via PCWorld). “This is certainly not something we are doing ourselves.”

If this is the case of a white-hat hacker doing a good deed though, it’s difficult not to wish them well. In the world of anti-cyber-crime, we need all the help we can get.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale covers how to guides, best-of lists, and explainers to help everyone understand the hottest new hardware and…
I spent a fortune on a Copilot+ PC, and I’ve barely ever touched Microsoft’s AI
Microsoft needs to give Copilot+ PC owners a reason to use Copilot
Copilot

There is a dedicated Copilot key on my ASUS Zenbook 14 OLED. Months after buying the laptop, it may be one of the least important keys on the entire keyboard. My Zenbook UM3406 runs on AMD’s Ryzen AI 300 series processor, complete with a dedicated NPU offering up to 50 TOPS of AI performance. That qualifies it as a Copilot+ PC, which makes it a part of what Microsoft once described as the new era for Windows.

AI is already a regular part of my workday. I use it for research, brainstorming, and working through ideas. But rather than relying on something built into the Windows OS, I've relied on the likes of ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

Read more
I bought into a brighter future, but my digital life bills monthly subscriptions
My day runs on streaming, cloud storage, AI, transport, and smart devices. None of it feels expensive until I realize almost nothing is ever fully paid for
Light, Adult, Female

Before I’ve properly started the day, several companies have already clocked in. Spotify or YouTube Premium handles the music, Google One keeps my files available, and an AI subscription is waiting in another tab to help me work faster.

Most of these charges earn their place. They save time, remove friction, and keep the day moving. I barely notice them until I think about what would stop working if one payment didn’t go through.

Read more
What happens when AI detectors fail? Researchers say we must be trained to spot fake AI faces
Researchers say spotting AI faces may soon depend more on people than software
Zuckerberg Deepfake

Artificial intelligence has become remarkably good at creating fake human faces. So good, in fact, that the old tricks people relied on - counting fingers, spotting warped earrings, or looking for distorted backgrounds - are quickly becoming obsolete. According to a new study highlighted by the BBC, the next line of defence may not be a better AI detector at all. It might simply be a better-trained human.

Researchers from the University of Aberdeen, working alongside Australia's National University, found that people can dramatically improve their ability to distinguish AI-generated faces from real ones after a relatively short period of structured training. Instead of hunting for obvious visual glitches, participants were taught to recognise subtle patterns that modern image generators still struggle to replicate consistently.

Read more