Skip to main content

Where in the world are all of AMD’s next-gen laptop GPUs?

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023 front view showing display and keyboard deck.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

I honestly forgot AMD released next-gen RDNA 3 laptop graphics cards, and I wouldn’t be surprised if you did too. At the beginning of this year, the company announced a slate of next-gen graphics cards for laptops, promising they’d be out by February. The laptops — and trust me, there are only a few — came and went, the seasons changed, and nothing. We’ve had no more AMD laptops since.

I won’t pretend AMD has a strong hand in the best gaming laptops. It’s a place Nvidia has dominated and will likely continue to do so for generations to come, but the offerings for mobile AMD GPUs are in very short order this year. And that’s especially disappointing considering the performance AMD originally claimed when it announced its RDNA 3 laptop graphics cards.

Let’s back up for a moment. In January, AMD revealed the RX 7600M XT, RX 7600M, RX 7700S, and RX 7600S laptop graphics cards. The star child of the range, the RX 7600M XT, was said to have performance on the level of a desktop RTX 3060. I’m operating on limited data here — that’s kind of the entire point of this article –but some benchmarks show this card matching the performance of the RTX 4060 laptop GPU, like the one in the Alienware x14 R2.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Matching the competition from Nvidia is something AMD hasn’t been able to do over the past couple of generations, even if laptops like the Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 were surprise hits last generation (this year, AMD graphics are totally absent from this laptop). You’d think that competitive performance would mean more of AMD’s next-gen GPUs in laptops, but they just aren’t available.

Someone typing on the Alienware m18 laptop.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

I’ve found a total of four laptops that you can buy in the U.S. with discrete RDNA 3 graphics. Asus has its Tuf Gaming A16 with the RX 7600S, Framework is offering its 16-inch laptop with an RX 7700S, and both the Alienware m16 and m18 offer the RX 7600M XT, but only when configured with an AMD CPU. If I’m missing something, feel free to email me. But the point remains that you’d have to go far out of your way to buy an AMD graphics card in a laptop this generation.

Even among the machines that offer these GPUs, you’d have to go out of your way. If you configure an Alienware m16 or m18 on Alienware’s website, for example, it will default to the RTX 4060 instead of the RX 7600M XT, even if you select an AMD CPU. And the Asus Tuf Gaming A16, despite receiving excellent reviews, is only available at Best Buy, buried under a pile of more popular Nvidia machines.

With the exception of the Framework Laptop 16, this is the same slate AMD announced in January. It doesn’t seem like any new laptops have gotten the RDNA 3 treatment, even among current partners like Alienware and Asus. Even Lenovo, HP, and MSI, who had all-AMD configurations in the previous generation, don’t have any new AMD graphics cards in their lineups.

The Framework laptop having its motherboard replaced.

It’s hard to say why. Nvidia dominates in gaming laptops, so it makes sense that Team Green would get priority for most laptop brands, but we’re more than half a year out from when AMD originally announced its slate of laptop GPUs. And still, we just don’t have the laptops.

More recent rumors have suggested AMD is working on higher-end options to put in laptops — one leaker claimed up to an RX 7800M XT — but with so few options in the current lineup, I’m not holding my breath. It’s a shame, too. Some rumors have said the fabled RX 7800M XT could reach the level of a desktop RTX 4070.

Despite making inroads into laptops in the previous generation with solid budget machines from MSI, Lenovo, and Asus, along with the showstopping Zephyrus G14, AMD’s offerings this generation have fallen completely flat. At the very least, the company is starting to build out its desktop lineup, with the new RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT arriving on September 6.

Editors' Recommendations

Jacob Roach
Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
It’s the end of an era for AMD
An AMD Ryzen CPU socketed in a motherboard.

AMD is following Intel's lead. The company is rebranding its Ryzen CPUs to closely align with what Intel is doing, shifting away from a long product string toward a three-digit part number that includes the phrase everyone is talking about: AI.

Starting with the new Strix Point CPUs, which sport the Zen 5 architecture, AMD is using "Ryzen AI" to differentiate its processors. In addition, instead of a string of four digits noting everything from the year released to the architecture the chip uses, AMD is using a three-digit part number, matching what Intel kicked off with its Meteor Lake CPUs.

Read more
Console performance just took a huge step forward
Jack in Immortals of Aveum.

Choosing between PC and console just got a little trickier because a feature that was previously reserved for PCs is now available on the Xbox Series S/X and PlayStation 5. The feature in question? Frame generation, courtesy of AMD's FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) 3. The tech did a superb job in the first tests on Xbox Series X, resulting in an up to 72% performance uplift in Immortals of Aveum. While this is a big step for AMD, and for console gaming as a whole, there are some downsides that underscore how this tech is still in its early days on consoles.

Upon the announcement that FSR 3 was now supported on all platforms as of the latest patch in Immortals of Aveum, Digital Foundry took the game out for a spin on an Xbox Series X, sharing its experience. The game, which normally tends to run at around 30 frames per second (fps) to 60 fps on the Xbox, saw a significant increase in frame rates, moving up from an average of 46 fps to 80 fps -- a 72% increase.

Read more
I tested two of the best data recovery services. Here’s which to use
A photo of EaseUS Data Recovery Wizard Pro and Recuva Professional side-by-sdie on a PC monitor.

If you’re searching for the best data recovery software, EaseUS and Recuva are two names that will appear near the top of the results. Both are well-known and popular apps that can restore lost files.

EaseUS Data Recovery Wizard Pro appears in our guide to the best data recovery software, as does and Recuva Professional, each earning a place in different ways. However, one comes out on top in this head-to-head comparison of pricing, features, and customer support.
Tiers and pricing
A side-by-side view shows EaseUS Data Recovery Wizard Pro and Recuva Professional pricing tiers. Digital Trends

Read more