Skip to main content

Humanity’s media habits shifted radically in the 2010s. What do the 2020s hold?

Alexis Kirke is something of a visionary when it comes to the future of TV. Once a “quant” on Wall Street, he took his Ph.D. in computer science and decided that he was going to be an artist. In 2013, he created Many Worlds, a film that changed the direction of its narrative based upon the biometric response of audience members, measured using special sensors capable of monitoring their brain waves, heart rate, perspiration levels and muscle tension. The average of these responses was then used to trigger different scenes.

It was, in essence, a low-budget, more high-tech Bandersnatch, years before Bandersnatch saw the dim light of a glowing Netflix screen. That was just the start.

Recommended Videos

In the years since, he’s created an adaptive personalized radio project at the University of Plymouth collaborating with the UK’s BBC amongst others; organized algorithmic film festivals; run experiments on quantum computers; and advised Hollywood studios on the future of interactivity. He is currently doing an additional postgrad study at Metfilm in Ealing Studios, the UK’s oldest and most prestigious film studio.

Kirke shared his thoughts on what the next 10 years is going to hold for television and the way we experience on-screen screen entertainment.

The consolidation of streaming services

Streaming services aren’t going away. But not all of them will go the distance. And while viewers will continue to reap the benefits of picking and choosing what they want to see when they want to see it, the landscape may wind up looking strangely familiar — taking us back to a time of bundled shows more reminiscent of the heyday of cable.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

“I think that Netflix’s dominance will die,” Kirke predicted. “It was a blip caused by them being first to market. The big players are entering the market in the form of traditional studios. But they will also fracture it. People will not want to subscribe to 10 different streamers, so streaming may consolidate back into the old TV channel system, where you pay a higher amount and get [a package of services.]”

Personalization, but not as we know it

Kirke’s Many Worlds helped lay the foundations for how interactivity could change the movies we watch. In an age of smart TVs, biometrics-tracking wearables and more, this data could be used by broadcasters to offer an alternative to current fixed narrative movies. Imagine, for example, a horror movie getting louder and more intense because it determines your heart rate isn’t elevated enough.

But while this might be promising, Kirke said there is still a “conceptual breakthrough” that has to happen before this is truly possible. Branching stories are a fun gimmick, but the real challenge is auto-generation of stories that will cover every eventuality. Right now, the technology’s not there yet. And we may not want it anyway.

Entertainment that can change its direction depending on the slightest decision of many people already exists — and it’s called video gaming.

“Choice can be debilitating when we log into Netflix,” he said. “And the knowledge subconsciously that we can change film to 30 others we want to watch, while watching the one we’re currently watching, can be distracting.”

Entertainment that can change its direction depending on the slightest decision of many people already exists — and it’s called video gaming. Games and TV-style entertainment may bleed over slightly, but don’t expect them to merge entirely. At least not any time soon.

As Digital Trends has covered before, the personalization most of us might see first is not narrative-based, but rather the advent of things like real-time personalized product placement edited into our content of choice.

The future of broadcast TV

The idea of broadcast television sticking to a fixed schedule is over. As iGen (the generation who grew up with smartphones and constant connectivity) grows older, it will appear like more of an anachronism than ever. Subscription services will highlight the challenges faced by traditional broadcasting.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

They’ll still have their niche, though — mainly the province of live sport and ultra-popular watercooler reality shows that large numbers of people need to watch at the same time.

Social media and gaming

Last year, YouTube was the most used app and website for children between the ages of 8 and 11. U.S. pre-teens say they would pick YouTube over broadcast TV if they had to choose between the two. In a decade’s time, this group will be between 18 and 21. Some may graduate to more traditional streaming services such as Netflix for more episodic content. But they’ll have grown up with the expectation that media is intrinsically social. The same age range are spending more time playing or social games like Fortnite, or watching them on Twitch.

Mainstream broadcasters and streamers will need to emulate YouTube and Twitch in order to to compete.

Mainstream broadcasters and streamers will need to emulate YouTube and Twitch in order to to compete. “Imagine a social Netflix with an open upload policy, which has a sort-of bargain basement where anybody can get their content on Netflix,” Kirke said. “A Netflix with social streaming channels. And eventually a Netflix with built-in social games you can choose to either login and watch others playing, or login and play yourself.”

New ways to watch content?

The 2020s will likely see new form factors emerge, but these will not necessarily lead to a one-size-fits-all medium for watching content. Kids are happy enough to consume media on their phones, but not all the time. Theaters will continue to provide a “social environment and shared experience, and better sound system and ambience,” Kirke said. “It is also a way of voluntary trapping ourselves in an environment and removing choice.”

As studios tried in the mid-twentieth century with the innovation of widescreen and gimmicks like smell-o-vision, they will today work to separate “theatrical event” movies from small screen films. New devices such as foldable smartphones could help make mobile viewing more popular, as large screens would become portable. But don’t write off the big screen experience.

Kirke thinks VR is currently a “dead-end.” The technology is too bulky and expensive. And efforts to provide a more immersive viewing experience miss the point by forcing users to be their own cinematographers and directors; responsible for choosing their own shots.

“In terms of the next step up from VR/AR and screens, it seems that this would be eyeball projection,” Kirke said. “If a person is put into a dark room, then the only light hitting their eyeballs could come from a [ultra-high] resolution projector at ultra frame rates. Roll on the day. Or not, depending on your religious and philosophical implications.”

Luke Dormehl
I'm a UK-based tech writer covering Cool Tech at Digital Trends. I've also written for Fast Company, Wired, the Guardian…
5 years ago, the best crime movie of the 2010s changed the game forever
Four women are behind bars in Hustlers.

The crime genre has long been dominated by men doing bad things. Think of the all-time best crime movies -- Goodfellas, Pulp Fiction, The French Connection -- and you'll notice how homogenous they are. Although they are not necessarily formulaic, they do follow a pattern, and it's one where bad men live dangerously, reach enviable highs, and eventually suffer huge downfalls. Sometimes, we root for them to win, as misguided as their actions might be, like in Dog Day Afternoon. Other times, we are fascinated by their journeys without ever empathizing with them, like in The Godfather. Whatever approach we take, a crime movie are often riveting and engaging. The best of them, however, are thought-provoking and intelligent, too, and no crime movie in the past decade has been more so than Lorene Scafaria's 2019 crime dramedy Hustlers.

Based on Jessica Pressler's 2018 article The Hustlers at Scores, the film centers around a group of New York City strippers who begin drugging their high-profile clients, including CEOs and stock traders, and maxing their credit cards. Starring an ensemble led by Constance Wu and a career-best Jennifer Lopez, Hustlers was a breath of fresh air when it premiered at the 2019 Toronto International Film Festival to rave reviews. Commercial success ensued, with the film grossing a whopping $157 million against a production budget of $20 million, making it one of 2019's biggest non-MCU success stories. At the time, Hustlers was declared one of the best movies of the year and a breakthrough in the careers of Scafaria, Lopez, and Wu. Now, five years later, it's very easy to see it as not only a towering dramatic achievement, but also the best crime movie of the 2010s that redefined the way we see such stories on the big screen.
Reframing crime

Read more
You probably didn’t watch the most underrated crime thriller of the 2010s. Here’s why you should see it now
Colin Farrell sips a drink in Widows.

In 2018, one of the greatest directors alive made a surprising, creatively inspired left turn. Just five years after he won Best Picture for 12 Years a Slave, Steve McQueen released his fourth feature directorial effort, Widows. Co-written by Gone Girl scribe Gillian Flynn, the crime thriller marked McQueen’s first foray into the kind of genre filmmaking he’d long avoided. Not only was it an unexpected follow-up to an austere award winner like 12 Years a Slave, but it felt like a purposeful change of pace for a director whose previous credits also included decidedly dour dramas like Hunger and Shame.

Many viewed the decision with skepticism: Was McQueen really the right fit for a pulpy thriller about a group of widows who decide to pick up where their deceased criminal husbands left off? When it was eventually released, Widows was welcomed with little fanfare. Some seemed to regard it as an intriguing, but ultimately minor experiment on McQueen’s part, and while it wasn’t a box office bomb, casual moviegoers didn’t run out in droves to see it, either.

Read more
Best movies of the 2010s, ranked by IMDB
Leonardo DiCaprio looks at a spinning top in "Inception."

Upon revisiting the 2010s, the entire film landscape experienced massive changes over the decade. Comic book adaptations and superhero movies began their ascension to box office supremacy. Netflix and other streaming services went from promising utilities to necessary platforms by the end of the decade. Also, innovative filmmakers like Quentin Tarantino, Bong Joon-ho, and Christopher Nolan all released films that are still revered in 2022.

Despite these transformations, the previous decade managed to provide some instant classics. From the ending of the Infinity Saga in the MCU to the first non-English language film to win Best Picture, there is a wide variety of great films to revisit. Below is a list of the best movies of the 2010s, according to IMDB.

Read more