Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Web
  4. News

Amazon offers refunds for fake solar eclipse glasses, faces related lawsuit

Amazon faces class-action lawsuit for allowing sale of faulty eclipse glasses

Add as a preferred source on Google

As one of the decade’s most exciting natural phenomena fast approaches, it would appear that some ne’er-do-wells are attempting to take advantage of the solar eclipse to turn a profit — but at the expense of their customers’ health. As initially reported by the Verge, Amazon has issued refunds for potentially false solar eclipse glasses, because yes, people are awful. And now, the retail giant is facing a class action lawsuit as a result of these transactions.

On August 21, a large swath of the American population was able to watch as the sun disappeared behind the moon. The “Great American Eclipse” marked the first time in 38 years that the nation (or at least, parts of it), was able to watch a total eclipse. But of course, watching such an event requires protective eyewear. And while many people turn to Amazon to buy just about everything they need in their lives, it would appear that the online retail giant has been unable to verify the safety of all the glasses on its site, and that some glasses sold through its site were either counterfeit or unsafe.

Recommended Videos

“Safety is among our highest priorities,” an Amazon spokesperson told TechCrunch. “Out of an abundance of caution, we have proactively reached out to customers and provided refunds for eclipse glasses that may not comply with industry standards. We want customers to buy with confidence anytime they make a purchase on Amazon.com and eclipse glasses sold on Amazon.com are required to comply with the relevant ISO standard.”

Unfortunately, this may have proven too little too late for some customers, who didn’t receive this notice in time. After the eclipse, Corey Payne and his fiancée, Kayla Harris, filed a class action lawsuit against Amazon, claiming that defective eclipse glasses purchased from the online retailer damaged their eyes. The couple purchased a three-pack of glasses from Amazon, and on August 21, looked into the sky to experience the historic eclipse.

But later that day, the couple alleged that they began experiencing headaches and eye watering, and later, developed impaired vision. The couple claimed that they did not receive Amazon’s message regarding the recall of potentially faulty glasses. Amazon has not responded to requests for comment regarding the case.

In addition to providing refunds, Amazon reportedly removed sellers who attempted to peddle unverified eclipse eyewear. If you bought a pair of sunglasses from Amazon for the purposes of watching the eclipse, and neither received a safety warning from the company nor experienced any discomfort post-eclipse, then you can reasonably conclude that the supplier confirmed the product to the ISO compliant. If you think, however, that you have been duped, you can always reach out to Amazon’s customer service for a refund, as promised by the A-to-Z Guarantee — or you can consider joining the class action.

Update: Amazon is facing a class action lawsuit over faulty eclipse glasses.

Lulu Chang
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
Yet another study says AI is bad for elections, and the rabbit hole gets worse
AI may be an election bomb waiting for someone to light the fuse
Voters cast their ballots on Election Day

Another election, another study has concluded that asking an AI chatbot for political guidance is a spectacularly bad idea. Research conducted during Hungary’s 2026 parliamentary election found that ChatGPT and Google Gemini offered not just inaccurate but also inconsistent and unreliable voting advice. The chatbots misclassified voter profiles, overlooked relevant parties, recommended parties absent from the ballot, and sometimes produced materially different answers when given the same information repeatedly.

AI keeps failing the voter test

Read more
Samsung’s humanoid robot ambitions are real, but factories come first
Samsung’s new robotics division has humanoids in its sights, although its immediate business is far more practical factory automation
Robot Touch Human Finger

Samsung wants a place in the humanoid race, but its new robotics push begins with machines built for factories rather than homes.

The CEO-led RX robotics division will initially focus on manufacturing robots. Samsung has separately identified humanoids as a priority, although it hasn’t announced a commercial model or explained where one fits into the division’s immediate plans.

Read more
The future of AI may depend on this one behind-the-scenes change
Running Claude on Android.

Whenever a new AI model arrives, it's easy to get caught up in the bells and whistles. We talk about how much smarter it is, how quickly it answers questions, or how realistic its images have become. But here's the thing: none of that matters much if the AI can't reliably work with the apps and services people use every day.

That's why an upcoming update to the Model Context Protocol (MCP) caught my attention. It isn't a new chatbot or a fancy AI model. In fact, most people will never even know it's happening. But it could quietly make the AI ecosystem a lot healthier. If you've never heard of MCP before, don't worry. Think of it as a shared language that lets AI assistants safely talk to apps like Gmail, Slack, calendars, databases, and countless other services. Instead of every company inventing its own way to make those connections, MCP gives everyone a common rulebook.

Read more