Skip to main content

Fitbit One versus Fitbit Zip: Is the One worth an extra $40?

Fitbit One vs Fitbit Zip headerTwo months after its initial announcement, Fitbit has finally shipped its latest fitness device: The Fitbit One. The tiny personal health tracker is meant to phase out the company’s first edition of the gadget, the Ultra, and maintains the same competitive price of $100. We’ve previously reviewed the Fitbit Zip, but should you spend the extra $40 for the upgraded version? Here’s our hands on verdict.

Fitbit One basics

The Fitbit One looks a lot like the Ultra – just a slimmed down version of its predecessor. Available in black or burgundy, the device comes with a silicon clip so you can attach it onto your clothes or carry in your pocket. The body of the device itself is mainly plastic with an LED display which alternates between showing you the amount of steps you’ve taken, floors climbed, calories burned, distance, time, and a stop watch feature. You charge the One with a USB cable and can get about a week’s worth of power in one charge.

Recommended Videos

Unlike the Zip, the Fitbit One also has a wrist/arm strap so you can actually wear the device rather than clip it on. This is because the device is capable of tracking sleep on top of steps taken to help you evaluate your overall lifestyle. You can set the sleep feature to recognize you as a Normal or Sensitive sleeper – the latter in case you happen to move a lot throughout the night. This function is made so you can see how much sleep you actually get in a night’s rest and what your “sleep efficiency” is.

You can also set up a “Silent Alarm” that comes as a series of vibration on your wrist to help wake you up when it’s time to rise and shine. This is a neat feature that’s best for those who share a bed with someone else, and don’t want to wake them up when you have to. Overall, the sleep data makes for an informative bar graph, but it’s still up to you as the user to figure out a way to get better sleep.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

One gripe I have with the One is its inability to automatically recognize when a user has fallen asleep. The device requires you to manually push a button when you sleep and wake up so it calculates the twists and turns you take during your sleep – so if you forgot to start or stop the clock during this period, the readings will be off. You also can’t go in the Fitbit Web interface to manually correct the times.

One versus Zip differences

Aside from the sleep feature, the One also comes with a few more upgrades from the Zip. One of the more notable feature is the LED screen which allows you to actually see your data in the dark (the Zip has no backlight). Its Bluetooth capability also allows you to sync your data straight to your mobile device, as well as transfer the information over to other fitness apps such as RunKeeper, LoseIt!, or MyFitnessPal. It’s an incredibly handy tool to help bridge all your mobile exercise routine together.

The USB charge is also an improvement over the Zip’s coin battery that needs replacement every six months. Instead of worrying about when the device will run of out juice, you can always keep the One plugged in a few hours a day to guarantee the day’s activity. The ability to wear the One on your wrist is also convenient, but can be a bit too obvious for those who prefer to keep their gadgets a bit more hidden.

Aside from these differences, the One and Zip operate in, more or less, the same manner. You’ll still see all your steps (and sleep data) logged on the Web interface, you can still customize personal goals, you still have to input exercise or food logs separately, and it’s still not shower-safe. Oh, and the device still greets you with an adorable smily face when you get a lot of steps in your day.

Bottom line

So, is the extra $40 worth the upgrade from the Zip to the One? If you actually care about your sleep patterns, or aim to use it in conjunction with fitness apps to get the most out of your mobile devices, absolutely. The better screen and Bluetooth functionality is made for those diligent enough to keep at their workouts thanks to a few apps and gadgets. If you are on a budget and want just a simple tool to track calorie burn and steps taken, the One will do just fine to keep you aware of daily activities.

FitbitOne
Image used with permission by copyright holder

At $100, the Fitbit One is one of the more affordable wearable fitness trackers on the market. There are some limitations, such as the lack of waterproofing and automatic sleep sensors, but it’s the perfect entry-level item for those who want to get started on changing their lifestyle. 

Natt Garun
Former Digital Trends Contributor
An avid gadgets and Internet culture enthusiast, Natt Garun spends her days bringing you the funniest, coolest, and strangest…
Mercedes bets solar paint is part of EV-charging future
mercedes solar paint evs benz electric camper

It’s been said that Albert Einstein’s genius came from his ability to freely wonder and ask child-like questions way before he even tried applying science-based solutions.
It seems some within the R&D department at Mercedes-Benz might be similarly inspired. The German automaker is currently developing a special solar paint that, when applied on the surface of vehicles, can harness enough energy from the sun to power up EVs.
The energy generated by the paint’s solar cells can be used for driving or fed directly into a high-voltage battery.
“The photovoltaic system is permanently active and also generates energy when the vehicle is switched off,” Mercedes says. “In the future, this could be a highly effective solution for increased electric range and fewer charging stops.”
The layer of paste to be applied on EVs is significantly thinner than a human hair, yet its photovoltaic cells are packed full of energy. Covering the surface of a mid-size SUV with the paint could produce enough energy for up to 7,456 miles per year under ideal conditions, Mercedes says.
This does imply being in geographic locations with plenty of sun hours during the day.
But even with less-than-ideal sun hours, the energy yielded can make a significant difference to EV charging. Mercedes says the solar-paint charge could provide 100% of needed energy for an average daily drive of 32 miles in sun-drenched Los Angeles. In much less sunny conditions -- such as around Mercedes’ headquarters in Stuttgart, Germany -- it would still yield enough energy for 62% of the distance.
An added bonus for environmentally-conscious drivers: Unlike some solar panels, the solar paint contains no rare earth or silicon – only non-toxic, readily available raw materials. It’s also easy to recycle and considerably cheaper to produce than conventional solar modules, Mercedes says.
The likes of Aptera, Sono Motors, Lightyear, and Hyundai have also been researching how to best harness solar energy to power up EVs.
But that’s been mostly through solar panels yielding enough energy for small and light vehicles, such as Aptera’s three-wheel solar EV. Solar paint could bring solar charging for bigger vehicles, such as electric SUVs, Mercedes says.

Read more
Volkswagen’s affordable ID.2 EV remains on track
vw id2 volkswagen affordable ev 1

It’s no secret that Volkswagen has been facing a huge slump in sales in Europe and China, forcing it to close plants in Germany.

But unlike other European automakers who have stuck to producing high-end electric vehicles (EVs), the German automaker keeps on reaffirming its commitment to bringing affordable EVs to market, including in the U.S.

Read more
Is a Jeep Cherokee replacement slated for 2025?
Jeep Cherokee

Jeep is remaining somewhat mysterious about the name of a new hybrid SUV slated to be part of the brand’s lineup in 2025.
Speaking at the Los Angeles Auto Show recently, Jeep CEO Antonio Filosa would only say that a new compact SUV with a hybrid powertrain was indeed on the way, according to Automotive News.
Filosa had already confirmed last spring that a new “mainstream” large SUV would soon be launched by Jeep, adding that we "could probably guess what it will be called." His comments had sparked speculation that the Cherokee brand name would be back.
While the brand name has existed since 1974, the Cherokee Nation in the U.S. had officially asked Jeep to stop using its name in 2021.
Early last year, Jeep quietly discontinued the model, which was one of its most iconic SUVs of the past 50 years.
The reason? Besides slumping sales, Jeep at the time cited the confluence of market dynamics, consumer preferences, and strategic brand realignment.
The Cherokee was viewed as a classic four-door SUV, known both for its reliability and its ability to suit both off-road and urban environments.
But with time, “consumer preferences have significantly shifted towards larger SUVs equipped with the latest technology and enhanced safety features,” Jeep said at the time. “This trend is accompanied by an increasing demand for environmentally friendly vehicles, steering the market towards hybrid and electric models.”
While no one knows for sure what the new SUV hybrid will be called, Jeep's parent company, Stellantis, is certainly doing everything it can to steer all its brands in the hybrid and electric direction.

Stellantis recently launched a new platform called STLA Frame that’s made for full-size trucks and SUVs. The platform is designed to deliver a driving range of up to 690 miles for extended-range electric vehicles (EREVs) and 500 miles for battery electric vehicles (BEVs).

Read more