Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

World’s first use of gene editing in leukemia saves life of infant girl

Add as a preferred source on Google

An infant with ‘incurable’ leukemia was the world’s first leukemia patient to be sucessfully treated with the experimental technique of gene editing. Performed at Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH), the procedure successfully destroyed the cancer cells in the girl, who was afflicted with Infant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL).

One-year-old Layla Richards was diagnosed with ALL when she was only 14 weeks old. After months of conventional treatments failed to cure the cancer, doctors told Layla’s parents that there was nothing else they could do and offered palliative care. Not willing to give up, the infant’s parents asked the doctors to try anything to save their little girl.

Recommended Videos

Coincidentally, a team of researchers from GOSH and UCL Institute of Child Health’s (ICH) were working on an experimental gene therapy technique that could be used to treat the aggressive form of cancer that Layla had. The technique had only been tested on laboratory mice, but that didn’t deter the Richards from pursuing the treatment. “It was scary to think that the treatment had never been used in a human before but even with the risks, there was no doubt that we wanted to try the treatment. She was sick and in lots of pain so we had to do something,” said Layla’s father Ashleigh.

After receiving approval from the hospital’s ethical committee, Layla was give a single 1ml infusion of genetically modified UCART19 cells. UCART19 are basically T-cells harvested from the immune system of healthy patients that are programmed to attack leukemia cancer cells. Unlike a similar approach that uses T-cells from the cancer patient, the technique developed by GOSH and biotech company Cellectis uses cells from healthy donors and modifies them so they can be given to a wide variety of patients. This was a life-saving difference for Layla who was so sick and so small that she didn’t have enough T-cells to harvest for any immunotherapeutic treatment.

RELATED: The next generation of bandages will detect infections, release medicine, and more

The gene editing of the UCART19 cells differs greatly from conventional gene therapy, which adds genes to the DNA of cells as part of the treatment. In gene editing, scientists use specialized molecular scissors known as TALEN proteins to cut into the DNA and introduce a mutation that turns off a gene. Using this technique, the team disabled a gene in the T-cells that marks them as being foreign. This modification allows the doctors to inject the cells into a patient without worrying about rejection by the recipient’s immune system. They also made a second gene-disabling edit that makes the T-cells invisible to standard leukemia medicine. This second edit is important as it lets doctors use conventional leukemia medicine alongside the gene therapy without diminishing the effectiveness of either technique.

Layla began to improve within a few weeks of receiving the UCART19 treatment. It is now several months later and Layla no longer has cancer cells in her body. Once doctors confirmed the leukemia was gone, she was given a bone marrow transplant to replace her blood and immune system which had been ravaged by her lengthy fight against the cancer. Doctors treating her aggressive cancer were “over the moon” when she improved and say her recovery is “almost a miracle.”

The researchers are cautious about calling this technique a panacea for cancer but the team is optimistic about their breakthrough. “We have only used this treatment on one very strong little girl, and we have to be cautious about claiming that this will be a suitable treatment option for all children. But, this is a landmark in the use of new gene engineering technology and the effects for this child have been staggering,” said Waseem Qasim, Professor of Cell and Gene Therapy at UCL ICH.

The team of scientists and physicians plan to improve their unconventional gene therapy technique with larger scale trials expected to begin in early 2016.

Kelly Hodgkins
Kelly's been writing online for ten years, working at Gizmodo, TUAW, and BGR among others. Living near the White Mountains of…
Scammers are teaching AI to sound like you, and research says our brains are falling for it
Has your accent just become a security vulnerability? AI scammers are getting too good at sounding local
Scammers are turning trusted news brands into investment traps

The next scam call you receive may not sound like a robot, a call center, or even someone pretending to be your relative. AI voice generators have become capable of reproducing regional accents and dialects that sound convincing enough that researchers are warning they could become a potent social-engineering tool.

For example, a scammer could use an accent familiar to a targeted community to make a suspicious call sound considerably more trustworthy.

Read more
Scientists found a way to turn plastic bottles into cookies you can actually eat
hand holding a cookie

Plastic bottles and cookies rarely show up in the same sentence, but a team of researchers just gave us a reason to talk about both together. According to Science Daily, scientists at Southern Illinois University Carbondale have engineered yeast that can turn waste from plastic bottles and old crop leftovers into real food ingredients and create cookies.

The work began as part of a NASA program exploring how astronauts might produce their own food during deep space missions, since resupply runs from Earth aren't exactly realistic that far out. The researchers' big insight was simple: plastic bottles are packed with carbon, and so, as it turns out, is food. That single connection became the foundation for everything that followed.

Read more
Students who use AI every day may be falling behind, while moderate users pull ahead
New global testing data suggests more AI in the classroom isn't automatically better.
Logo, Text

I assumed more AI access might help students learn faster. However, a new OECD study dispels that misconception for me and everyone else who gave their children a paid version of AI chatbots, thinking it would help them through their educational journey. 

According to PISA 2025 data from 760,000 students in 91 countries, students who use AI daily score meaningfully worse on standardized tests than their peers. The full picture is more complicated than a simple ban would fix.

Read more