Hyperloop pod: 124 student teams selected for capsule design contest

By Trevor Mogg Published January 31, 2016

To many, Elon Musk’s Hyperloop vision sounded more fanciful than sensible when he first unveiled his bold plan two years ago. But as time passes, people seem to be warming to the idea of one day climbing into a pod for a 760-mph inter-city journey through a very long tube. A lumbering city bus, this is not.

So, about those pods. SpaceX, the Musk-run company behind Hyperloop, has just announced the student teams that’ll be battling it out next month to see who can come up with the best pod prototype.

Recommended Videos

A total of 124 engineering teams from more than 100 universities across 20 countries have been chosen, with around 1,000 students taking part. The contest takes place at Texas A&M University from January 29 to 30.

If the designs are half as creative as the team names, we can expect some exciting plans for Hyperloop’s high-speed transportation capsule. Rochester Institute of Technology, for example, is sending along the PodSquad, while Stanford University has gone with Pod People. One of Texas A&M University’s seven teams is called HyperWhoop, and young innovators from Mexico have chosen the name Delorean – wonder if this is a heavy hint on how their proposed design might look.

All the pod designs will go before a panel of judges comprising representatives from Texas A&M University, SpaceX, and Musk’s other company, Tesla.

The winning teams will then have to gather funding to build their prototypes, which they’ll be able to try out next summer on a one-mile test track being built close to the SpaceX headquarters in Hawthorne, California.

Musk said he came up with the idea for Hyperloop after feeling disappointment at the plan for the California high-speed rail system, which is currently under development. The initial Hyperloop proposal involves high-speed above-ground transportation tubes between between LA and San Francisco. Magnetic accelerators would help propel passenger-filled pods through the tubes at high speed, cutting a trip between the two cities from around six hours (by car) to just 35 minutes.

To find out more about Hyperloop, be sure to check out DT’s awesome in-depth guide here.

Contributing Editor

Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…

Topics

Emerging Tech

OpenAI admits it needs to rethink what happens when AI goes rogue

As increasingly capable AI agents move beyond controlled tests, OpenAI is confronting a difficult question: When does strange model behavior become an incident the public deserves to know about?

OpenAI has spent plenty of time explaining how it plans to stop increasingly capable AI agents from doing things they shouldn't. Now, the company says it needs to get better at telling everyone when those things have already happened. The admission follows reports of another previously undisclosed incident involving OpenAI's AI agents, this time affecting a German-language programming wiki. According to Reuters, agents made more than 15,000 unauthorized edits to DseWiki, using the site to communicate and share ways to bypass restrictions, cheat on tasks, and avoid detection.

OpenAI has now acknowledged what it calls the "wiki incident" and says the episode exposed a larger problem with how AI companies disclose unexpected model behavior. The company says it is developing a framework for deciding when and how to make incidents involving misaligned AI public.

Emerging Tech

AI has a safety problem nobody is ready for

AI safety efforts are ramping up, but their protections don’t work equally well everywhere. In developing countries, language gaps and cultural blind spots can turn everyday AI mistakes into serious real-world consequences.

AI companies are spending an enormous amount of time worrying about what happens when their models become too capable. OpenAI even took the unusual step of temporarily pausing training on a model last month over safety concerns, as the industry grapples with risks ranging from autonomous behavior to increasingly sophisticated cyber capabilities.

But there’s another AI safety problem that is much easier to overlook: the protections already being built into these systems don’t necessarily work equally well for everyone. A new report from Rest of World highlights how AI safety efforts remain heavily centered around the needs of wealthier, English-speaking countries. That can leave people in parts of Asia, Africa, and other developing regions dealing with problems as basic and potentially dangerous as a chatbot misunderstanding their language.

Branded Content

The IFA 2026 Publisher Award Winners Bring Fresh Ideas to Everyday Tech

From Smarter Entry to Screen-Free Wellness, These IFA 2026 Winners Do Things Differently

IFA 2026 Publisher Awards

IFA is the kind of event where almost every corner promises the next big thing in tech. Some ideas are ambitious, others are surprisingly simple, and a few make you wonder why nobody thought of them sooner. But among hundreds of new products, the most memorable ones usually have something more going for them than novelty alone.

This year’s IFA Publisher Award winners are a good example. They span everything from smart entry and personal wellness to coffee, floor care, and big-screen entertainment. What connects them is how they take technology in interesting new directions while keeping its purpose grounded in how people actually use it.