Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Jet lag really is worse if you go east instead of west — mathematicians just proved it

Add as a preferred source on Google

If you’ve ever thought that jet lag hits you much harder when traveling east rather than west, it’s not your imagination —  a new mathematical model created by researchers at the University of Maryland proves that its actually true.

As co-author of the study Professor Michelle Girvan tells Digital Trends, it’s all to do with the brain’s so-called “pacemaker cells” getting disrupted as people travel across different timezones.

Recommended Videos

“The reason that it’s harder to go east for most people is that your internal clock has a natural period that’s a little bit longer than 24 hours,” Professor Girvan explains. “What that means is that if you travel west, that’s making your day longer — which your internal clock has an easier time with because its period is already slightly more than 24 hours. With east, on the other hand, it’s more more difficult for the opposite reason.”

The University of Maryland study uses mathematical proofs to show how the brain’s pacemaker cells have to resynchronize as they adapt to new timezones — with certain eastbound journeys being so far that they actually set your internal clock backwards instead of forwards.

“What was surprising for us was that the small difference between the natural period of your internal clock and a full 24 hour day is responsible for very large differences, in terms of recovering from jetlag for a trip that’s east versus west,” Professor Girvan continues. According to the model she helped develop, traveling eastward across three timezones will take the average person around four days to recover — while a similar trip westward would take just three days for a person to return to normal.

She does, however, note that not everyone reacts in exactly the same way, and that the parameters in the model account for variation on a person-to-person basis. “For some people, the toughest travel might be six hours east,” Professor Girvan says. “For other people it might be nine hours east.”

Going forwards, she tells Digital Trends that she would like to form “a stronger partnership with neuroscientists” to find out more about this effect. So long as that neuroscientist is located west of Maryland, presumably!

Luke Dormehl
I'm a UK-based tech writer covering Cool Tech at Digital Trends. I've also written for Fast Company, Wired, the Guardian…
Yet another study says AI is bad for elections, and the rabbit hole gets worse
AI may be an election bomb waiting for someone to light the fuse
Voters cast their ballots on Election Day

Another election, another study has concluded that asking an AI chatbot for political guidance is a spectacularly bad idea. Research conducted during Hungary’s 2026 parliamentary election found that ChatGPT and Google Gemini offered not just inaccurate but also inconsistent and unreliable voting advice. The chatbots misclassified voter profiles, overlooked relevant parties, recommended parties absent from the ballot, and sometimes produced materially different answers when given the same information repeatedly.

AI keeps failing the voter test

Read more
Samsung’s humanoid robot ambitions are real, but factories come first
Samsung’s new robotics division has humanoids in its sights, although its immediate business is far more practical factory automation
Robot Touch Human Finger

Samsung wants a place in the humanoid race, but its new robotics push begins with machines built for factories rather than homes.

The CEO-led RX robotics division will initially focus on manufacturing robots. Samsung has separately identified humanoids as a priority, although it hasn’t announced a commercial model or explained where one fits into the division’s immediate plans.

Read more
The future of AI may depend on this one behind-the-scenes change
Running Claude on Android.

Whenever a new AI model arrives, it's easy to get caught up in the bells and whistles. We talk about how much smarter it is, how quickly it answers questions, or how realistic its images have become. But here's the thing: none of that matters much if the AI can't reliably work with the apps and services people use every day.

That's why an upcoming update to the Model Context Protocol (MCP) caught my attention. It isn't a new chatbot or a fancy AI model. In fact, most people will never even know it's happening. But it could quietly make the AI ecosystem a lot healthier. If you've never heard of MCP before, don't worry. Think of it as a shared language that lets AI assistants safely talk to apps like Gmail, Slack, calendars, databases, and countless other services. Instead of every company inventing its own way to make those connections, MCP gives everyone a common rulebook.

Read more