Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Gaming
  3. News

Razer is in fact following through on Ouya’s indie game fund [updated]

By

razer allegedly nullifies ouya indie funding fund header
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Updated by Will Fulton on 7-29-2015: In contrast to earlier reports that Razer was backing out of Ouya’s financial commitment to the “Free the Games Fund”, the hardware manufacturer has annoucned its plans to pay out the estimated $620,000 to eligible independent developers. One notable change is that Razer is dropping the stipulated platform exclusivity to Ouya in exchange for offering an equitable amount of free downloads to subscribers of Razer’s Cortex TV service. You can read Razer’s full statement below:

Razer and a new Ouya publishing entity will work to satisfy previously involved Free the Games

Recommended Videos

“Razer has a real interest in supporting indie developers and furthering the expansion of Android (FtG) developers, while creating a more open, sustainable distribution model that benefits gamers and expands revenue opportunities for all parties involved.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

Razer plans to back the new Ouya to fulfill an estimated $620,000 fund established for FtG developers who had signed FtG agreements with the original Ouya and who fulfill their FtG agreement milestones and related commitments on Kickstarter.

Qualified FtG developers will need to sign up with the new OUYA for a new publishing agreement.

Financial terms will remain largely the same with one notable exception. Advances under the FtG agreements demanded commercial exclusivity to the Ouya platform. Under the proposed new agreements, Razer and Ouya publishing will forgo exclusivity in favour of developers providing an equitable amount of their FtG-funded titles to gamers for free on the Cortex TV platform. For example, if $10,000 is funded toward a $1 game, then 10,000 games at $1 would be given away at no cost to gamers on Cortex TV. Ouya publishing will not limit developers in any instance to one or another platform, but will promote publishing to all Android platforms-Google Play, Cortex TV, XiaoMi, Alibaba, and the likes.

Razer has a real interest in supporting indie developers and furthering the expansion of Android gaming on TV. Moving forward with this plan will ensure that both interests are met, as openly, widely, and beneficially as possible. Razer did not acquire hardware, agreements, pre-existing liabilities or debts from Ouya-only software related to the Ouya store and content catalog. Razer must sign new agreements with FtG developers, since there are no existing legal or non-legal developer relationships. Razer’s credo is “By Gamers. For Gamers.” Giving back to gamers, game developers and those who support the gaming lifestyle is what it’s all about.”

Original Story on 7-28-2015: Indie developers expecting a cash reward for releasing Ouya versions of their games may not get what they’re owed following the platform’s recent purchase by hardware manufacturer Razer, according to an Engadget report.

An anonymous developer eligible for Ouya’s “Free the Games Fund” tells Engadget that Razer nullified the deal over a series of phone calls earlier this month, despite long-standing promises from Ouya’s previous owners.

In 2013, Ouya announced that it had earmarked $1 million for the “Free the Games Fund,” an initiative that provided financial incentive for indie developers to release exclusive games for the company’s $100 Android microconsole.

To be eligible for funding, developers agreed to make their games Ouya-exclusive for a minimum of six months. After the period of exclusivity ended, Ouya would then match the funding amount developers had earned from a linked Kickstarter project, up to a maximum payout of $250,000.

Ouya later revised its terms in order to address criticism and make funding more accessible for smaller studios. Afterward, the Free the Games Fund required developers to reach a $10,000 minimum funding goal on Kickstarter, with at least 100 backers logged for every additional $10,000 received afterward.

According to affected developers, Ouya quietly updated its Free the Games Fund contract earlier this year, adding a clause terminating all agreements in case of the company’s insolvency, bankruptcy, or discontinuation. Razer’s recent purchase of Ouya apparently absolves either company of payment under the updated terms.

Razer allegedly told a Free the Games Fund developer earlier this month that they would not receive Ouya’s promised $30,000 in matched funding. “Razer/Ouya’s insistence that these deals are gone is causing us to have to majorly restructure our plans leading up to release,” the anonymous developer told Engadget. “The remaining money owed from the fund is essential to us in our last stages of marketing and QA, as well as a resource for continued content updates of the game after initial release.”

Razer has not issued a response regarding Ouya Free the Games Fund developer allegations.

Editors’ Recommendations

Topics
Danny Cowan
Danny Cowan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Danny’s passion for video games was ignited upon his first encounter with Nintendo’s Duck Hunt, and years later, he still…
Our favorite indies of 2023: 10 unforgettable games you need to try
The main character of El Paso Elsewhere appears in front of a graphic that says Top 10 Indies.

You could have spent the entirety of 2023 keeping up with new games and you still wouldn't have played a fraction of the excellent games released this year. That's especially true for the independent scene, which produced some fantastic works of art in-between gargantuan releases like The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom. I can't blame anyone for missing a few -- I feel like I've barely scratched the surface myself -- but you shouldn't leave 2023 without a handful of indies in your backlog.

Some of the year's best independent games sought to celebrate the human experience in a wide variety of ways. Games like Venba and Tchia both explored cultures that have always been underrepresented in gaming. More broadly, titles like Humanity, Viewfinder, and Chants of Sennaar offered odes to human ingenuity and communication in entirely different ways. Others got even more personal, dealing with complex forms of grief that aren't so easy to pin down.

Read more
For Microsoft, indies aren’t Game Pass extras. They’re the future of Xbox
A list of indie games on Xbox appears in a grid.

Xbox may be about as corporate a brand as you can find, but it’s been a surprisingly vital platform for independent developers. That dates back to the Xbox Live Arcade days of old, when small developers were given a place to easily publish their projects on consoles. Rather than pulling away from those days, Xbox has only doubled down on its relationship to indies in the years since through initiatives like ID@Xbox and a Developer Acceleration Program designed to help underrepresented developers get their games out.

Over the past few months, the brand has been on a global tour to reach small developers directly and court them to Xbox. That effort would take the company to New York City on November 18, where Xbox leadership would speak to local developers and students about how to submit to their programs (the event would also feature a questionably timed speech from New York City Mayor Eric Adams amid an FBI investigation into his campaign funds). It’s clear that Microsoft is investing a lot of time and money into signing deals with small developers, but why make the effort when it could comfortably thrive just by publishing major titles through acquired publishers like Activision Blizzard and Bethesda?

Read more
The ‘Indie’ label is losing its meaning, and that’s a big problem for gaming
Dave swimming near a dolphin confused.

"Indie" isn't a new or unique term exclusive to gaming. Music and film in particular have had decades of independent productions that occasionally break through into mainstream success. Indie games have, of course, been around since the advent of the medium itself, but only really came to prominence to the wider public in the late 2000s and early 2010s when digital distribution started becoming a major player. Just like in music and film, indie games drew attention based on that label which implied to the audience that what they were looking at was the work of a small, passionate team not beholden to the same corporate mandates as traditional games. What they lacked in budget and scope, they made up for in heart and fresh ideas.

In 2023, that term is losing its meaning. Indie is quickly becoming a loose word used to describe a type of game rather than the actual environment in which it was made -- something that's fueling a controversy at this year's Game Awards. With 'indie' being tossed around more loosely by players and gaming institutions alike, we're starting to lose what made the word meaningful in the first place: it helped provide a spotlight for games made by passionate teams without the means or money to get mainstream attention.
Fishing for attention
This indie debate picked up a lot of attention this week due to the recently released nominations for The Game Awards. Specifically, debates arose after Dave the Diver was nominated for Best Indie. Dave the Diver was developed by Mintrocket, which is owned entirely by Nexon, a multibillion-dollar South Korean publisher. That's hardly what one thinks of when they hear the term "indie," but it was an easy mistake to make on its surface. The creative, small-scale game features a pixel art style that's usually reserved for indies these days and is an experimental genre mash-up we expect from games like Slay the Spire.

Read more