Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Gaming
  3. News

Striking video game voice actors often don’t know what game they’re voicing

Gabe Gurwin
By
SAG AFTRA Interactive Negotiations 2016
One of the biggest grievances of video game voice actors currently striking against the industry is that quite often they don’t even know what game it is they’re working on, at least not until long time after recording. This means that actors often don’t get the rates they might otherwise be able to demand for major jobs, and that’s something they want to change.

As of 12:01 a.m. Friday, the strike of the Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists officially began. Union members picketed publisher Electronic Arts on Monday, October 24, but officially it all began a few days before.

Recommended Videos

Citing several issues related to both safety and monetary compensation, the organization more commonly known as the SAG-AFTRA will be preventing its members from performing in any video game that started its production after February 17, 2015, for a number of major companies.

Related

The full list of picketed developers and publishers is: Activision Publishing, Blindlight, Corps of Discovery Films, Disney Character Voices, Electronic Arts Productions, Formosa Interactive, Insomniac Games, Interactive Associates, Take 2 Interactive Software, VoiceWorks Productions and WB Games.

“Video games have grown into a multibillion-dollar industry where the top titles earn more than even the highest-grossing blockbuster movies, yet the Interactive Media Agreement, uniquely among our contracts, does not provide for a residual or any other form of back-end compensation,” the strike notice states.

Although the desire to maintain secrecy can be understood, given that employees and contractors at developers have been known to let slip major developments, the voice actors’ demand to know where their voices will eventually end up can equally be understood. This is especially true given that they are required to sign non-disclosure agreements.

The notice also lists “transparency” as an issue, with companies “routinely” hiring actors “without identifying basic information about the nature of the performance that will be expected of them.”

It’s certainly possible that not all voice actors would want to lend their vocal talents to games involving violence or adult themes. Strikers want to make sure that doesn’t happen in the future.

Actors’ health concerns, relating to their voices and otherwise, have also been placed on the table. The strike demands that “vocally stressful sessions” — specifically where actors are screaming, simulating deaths, or grunting — be limited to two hours and paid at a four-hour rate. Though the Interactive Media Agreement already requires a stunt coordinator be present as dangerous shoots, this is also reiterated in the notice.

“The video game employers we are striking continue to operate under the terms of an agreement structured more than twenty years ago for an industry that was only beginning to utilize professional performance,” the strike notice states. “Since then, games have evolved to provide increasingly immersive and cinematic experiences that compete with television and theatrical motion pictures for consumer dollars.”

Games that went into production before the aforementioned date will not be struck, and voice actors, singers, and motion-capture performers are free to work on them. Given the long development time associated with contemporary AAA games, this could mean that consumers wouldn’t see the effects of the strike for a considerable period of time. A vote to authorize the guild to strike was held last September, with more than 96 percent of its members agreeing to strike.

On Thursday, October 20, a day before the strike was scheduled to begin, the video game publishers and developers, acting under “Interactive Video Game Companies,” made what they termed their “final offer” to SAG-AFTRA. This would give union members an “immediate” 9-percent wage hike should it be ratified by December 1. The offer also includes up to $950 in extra wages per game “based upon the number of sessions a performer works on a particular game.” The contract would last for three years, and includes no payment based on a game’s performance.

Originally published in October, 2016. Gabe Gurwin contributed to this report. Updated on 10-25-16 by Jon Martindale: Grievances and reasons for strike added, along with list of boycotted companies.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Gabe Gurwin
Gabe Gurwin
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Gabe Gurwin has been playing games since 1997, beginning with the N64 and the Super Nintendo. He began his journalism career…
The best video game remakes reinvent the classics, they don’t just revisit them
Isaac Clarke stands in a dark room in Dead Space.

The video game industry has remake fever. While the idea of redoing a classic game is nothing new (see something as old as 1993’s Super Mario All-Stars), we’re currently experiencing a wave of remakes as developers revisit some of the best games of the 2000s and beyond. Last year we got The Last of Us Part I and Crisis Core: Final Fantasy Reunion, while 2023 will see games like Resident Evil 4 getting a full redo hot on the heels of Dead Space. Like a Dragon: Ishin, Advance Wars 1+2: Re-boot Camp, Silent Hill 2, System Shock … the list seemingly grows with every passing month.

With so many remakes filling up 2023’s game release calendar, I find myself asking a simple question: Why? That’s not a cynical question directed at the overall concept of remakes, but rather one that’s worth asking on an individual project level. Why is 2023 the right moment to reboot a series? What will this remake do to deepen my understanding of the original game? Are more modern graphics enough to justify a retread into a 15-year-old game that still plays well by today’s standards, or would that time and money have been better spent moving forward?

Read more
Even HBO’s The Last of Us can’t fully master the video game adaptation
Pedro Pascal with his finger to his mouth telling someone to be quiet in a scene from The Last of Us on HBO Max.

There's a pretty good chance that your favorite video game will be made into a movie or TV show.

Thanks in no small part to efforts by PlayStation Productions and the success of movies like Sonic the Hedgehog and TV shows like Arcane, there will only be more adaptations of your favorite video games coming. We’ve come to a sort-of apex with The Last of Us on HBO, a prestige TV take on one of gaming's most celebrated titles. It has legitimate stars, a big budget, Chernobyl’s showrunner at the helm, and is raking in viewers. Only three episodes have aired at the time of this writing, but it’s already poised for success, both in terms of viewership and critical accolades.

Read more
If you have a Netflix subscription, don’t sleep on the service’s games
A blue cat chasing a creature.

When Netflix first announced it was pushing into video games, the news was met with some healthy skepticism. By that point, we’d seen a few non-gaming companies like Google and Amazon try to elbow into the space with services that struggled to deliver strong, consistent content. Netflix seemed doomed to go down the same path when it launched its first batch of games, an unimpressive list that included mobile games. That slow start may have put the steamer on the wrong foot as only 1% of subscribers were reportedly engaging with its gaming offerings earlier this year.

A lot has changed in the past few months. Netflix has gone from zero to 60 since June, seemingly releasing a notable new game every few weeks. That sudden explosion hit another high note this week with the release of Desta: The Memories Between, a standout mobile title that’s exclusive to Netflix members.

Read more