Skip to main content

Your Apple Watch’s SpO2 sensor might be a lot better than you thought

The Apple Watch’s SpO2 sensor that allows wearers to measure their blood oxygen levels was impressive when it first debuted, but it may be even more accurate than initially marketed.

According to a recent study, the Apple Watch’s blood oxygen reader is comparable to medical-grade pulse oximeters. Although Apple Watches shouldn’t be used in lieu of official medical devices, it’s nice to know that the readings they’re displaying are accurate enough to be reliable.

The case back differences between the Apple Watch SE 2 and Apple Watch Series 8.
Apple Watch SE 2 (left) and Apple Watch Series 8 (right) Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

First reported by 9to5Mac, the study was published this month in the Digital Health journal and sought to compare a “commercially available smartwatch” to a medical-grade pulse oximeter. The watch the study used was the Apple Watch Series 6, the first of Apple’s smartwatches to include an SpO2 sensor, which is over two years old at this point.

The results of the study showed that the Apple Watch “can reliably detect states of reduced blood oxygen saturation with SpO2 below 90% when compared to a medical-grade pulse oximeter.” To come to that conclusion, the study used 24 healthy participants, each one wearing an Apple Watch Series 6 on their wrist and clamped a Masimo Radical-7, a common pulse oximeter, on the middle finger of the same hand. The participants then did various breathing exercises to manipulate their blood oxygen levels to see how the Apple Watch performed when compared to the Masimo Radical-7. By the end of the tests, there were 642 blood oxygen readings to compare.

To reiterate: If you’re looking for a fully accurate blood oxygen level reading, it’s still best to use a proper medical device. But the results of the study show that Apple’s wearable tech is certainly moving in the proper direction for providing accurate medical information. In addition to the SpO2 sensor, Apple Watches provide alerts for irregular heartbeat rhythms that may suggest atrial fibrillation, medication intake reminders, and sleep tracking.

While Apple doesn’t claim that any of its devices can be used as concrete medical readers, the features that have been added to Apple Watches, in particular, are extraordinarily useful for those looking to monitor their bodily functions and have informed conversations with healthcare providers should they discover anything noteworthy.

Peter Hunt Szpytek
A podcast host and journalist, Peter covers mobile news with Digital Trends and gaming news, reviews, and guides for sites…
I’m glad I never bought the Apple Watch Ultra 2
Modular Ultra watch face on an Apple Watch Ultra.

When Apple launched the original Apple Watch Ultra in 2022, it wasn’t a complete surprise since Apple had been rumored to have a more “rugged” Apple Watch model coming for a couple of years. But what was surprising was just how good the original Apple Watch Ultra was — even for people who never plan to go scuba diving or climb a mountain.

In 2023, Apple released the Apple Watch Ultra 2, which is identical to the original on the surface. But on the inside, it has the new S9 chip for localized Siri requests and the Double Tap gesture. Other than that, there’s really very little difference between the two; there wasn’t even a new color to differentiate between the original and the new one.

Read more
You’re running out of time to buy a new Apple Watch. Here’s why
A person wearing the Apple Watch Series 9.

The Apple Watch Series 9 and Apple Watch Ultra 2 are two of the best smartwatches you can buy in 2023. Unfortunately, you soon won't be able to buy them from Apple. On Monday, December 18, Apple confirmed it will stop sales of both Apple Watch models beginning December 21.

In a statement sent to 9to5Mac, Apple confirmed it is "pausing sales of the Apple Watch Series 9 and Apple Watch Ultra 2 from Apple.com starting December 21, and from Apple retail locations after December 24."

Read more
I wore a G-Shock watch that rivals the Apple Watch Ultra 2
The G-Shock GW-9500 Mudman on some mud and grass.

I really like the Apple Watch Ultra, but I also like watches in general. Recently, I was in a situation where I didn’t need to track any activity but still wanted to wear a tough watch that not only fitted in with a muddy, grubby, harsh environment — but could cope with it should the need arise.

I turned to the recently released Casio G-Shock GW-9500 Mudman, and while it’s not a smartwatch, it was the perfect choice for the day. Later, I wondered if this Bluetooth-free, seemingly indestructible watch could actually be an alternative to the Apple Watch Ultra. Is it? Here's what I learned.
The right watch for off-roading
My Land Rover for the day — before it got very muddy indeed Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Read more