Despite constant urging from the FBI, Apple staunchly refused to bypass any of the security measures built-in to its flagship smartphone. As the U.S. government continued to pressure Apple into writing software it claimed would only be used on one phone, Tim Cook continued to stand firm in the company’s denial of help. Cook even went so far as to say Apple would “not shrink from this responsibility” during a March 21 product event, mere hours before the Justice Department decided to pull the plug on the hearing.
“On Sunday, March 20, 2016, an outside party demonstrated to the FBI a possible method for unlocking Farook’s iPhone,” reads the Justice Department’s official filing. “Testing is required to determine whether it is a viable method that will not compromise data on Farook’s iPhone. If the method is viable, it should eliminate the need for the assistance from Apple Inc. (‘Apple’) set forth in the All Writs Act Order in this case.”
Related Offer: The iPhone SE. A big step for small.
The filing further details a call placed by the United States Attorney to Apple’s counsel, asking for the company’s position on its desire to cancel the hearing. Just a few hours after the call was placed, a judge reportedly granted the motion and officially cancelled the hearing.
Originally, the FBI and Apple were due in court at 1 p.m. PST on March 22, where both parties were scheduled to give arguments regarding the case. U.S. Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym, who originally ordered Apple to create the backdoor, was set to preside over the arguments.
Editors' Recommendations
- iPhone 15: release date and price predictions, leaks, rumors, and more
- You aren’t ready for this Galaxy S23 vs. iPhone 14 Pro camera test
- I love the Galaxy S23 — here are 5 things the iPhone still does better
- I’ve used Android phones for 10 years, and I hate these ones the most
- The one thing the iPhone 14, Galaxy S23, and Pixel 7 all get wrong
