Lyft puts brakes on New York City launch

By Trevor Mogg July 13, 2014

lyft ride sharing

Just hours before Lyft was due to launch its service in New York City on Friday evening, the ride-sharing startup announced it was postponing its debut there.

The decision came a couple of days after the City and Taxi Limousine Commission (TLC) advised New Yorkers not to step inside a Lyft car, claiming that the company had no authority to operate in the city. It added that Lyft drivers could face fines of up to $2,000 if the startup went ahead with the launch.

Related Videos

However, it’s not clear if Lyft made the decision to postpone the launch by itself, or whether it was made in response to the issuance of a court order.

Temporary restraining order?

In a move to ensure the ride-sharing service reconsidered its launch plans, Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman and New York State Superintendent of Financial Services Benjamin M. Lawsky on Friday said they had filed a temporary restraining order against Lyft.

“After Lyft rejected a reasonable request by the State to delay its launch, we filed a motion for a temporary restraining order in State Supreme Court this morning,” the pair said in a joint statement.

It continued: “We pursued this action only after repeatedly offering to work with Lyft in order to ensure that its business practices complied with the law. Instead of collaborating with the State to help square innovation with statute and protect the public….Lyft decided to move ahead and simply ignore state and local laws.”

In a post on its blog, however, Lyft insisted it had “agreed” to put off the launch and plans to meet the TLC Monday “to work on a new version of Lyft that is fully-licensed by the TLC.” It said no temporary restraining order had been imposed, describing the wording of Schneiderman and Lawsky’s release as “a deliberate misstatement.”

Lyft told Digital Trends earlier in the week that it believed the TLC’s licensing rules don’t apply to its ride-sharing model and therefore felt it was clear to operate in the city.

The TLC disagreed, adding that the service also failed to comply with its strict safety requirements. To reassure potential customers, Lyft issued a “New York Safety Commitment” listing everything from background checks on its drivers to rigorous car inspections.

Lyft and city officials will return to court Monday, with the startup hoping to reach an agreement that’ll it to reschedule a launch date.

Editors' Recommendations

Mobile

Uber and Lyft rides in New York City just got more expensive

Uber vs. Lyft

You're now paying more for your ridesharing trips in New York City.

Anyone taking an Uber, Lyft, Juno or Via ride from February 1 will pay more for their trips following the implementation of a number of new rules at the start of this month.

Mobile

iPhones are now part of cops’ crime-fighting kit in New York City

nypd iphones for cops cop smartphone

The cops of New York City have a new crime-fighting tool: The iPhone.

Having finally decided that Windows-based phones aren't the future, the New York Police Department is now in the process of ditching its Lumia handsets and replacing them with thousands of Apple-made devices.

Computing

New York won’t do business with ISPs not adhering to net neutrality principles

net neutrality rules fraud

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo plans to ensure internet access based on net neutrality within the local government. In a signed executive order, no New York State government agency is allowed to do business with internet service providers (ISPs) that don't abide by net neutrality-based principles. The executive order does not regulate ISP business practices within the private sector.
The order covers everything maintained by the government, such as educational institutions, offices spread out across the state, and public internet access. The declaration guarantees a free and open internet to any individual accessing the web from these points. The government can't dictate how ISPs regulate internet connections in homes and businesses.
Prior to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) reclassifying ISPs a public utility, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) kept these companies in check. ISPs didn't throttle internet speeds or filter content save for addressing customers found downloading pirated content and those who went over their monthly data allowance. But the FCC reclassified ISPs in February 2015, finalized a set of regulations four months later, and then repealed those rules at the end of 2017.
Many ISPs pledge to keep the internet free and open, devoid of any content restrictions or throttling. Even the State of New York admits this dedication. "Many of the Internet Service Providers (ISPs) serving New Yorkers have made public pledges to continue to abide by the principles of a free and open internet despite the FCC's actions," the governor's office states. Yet the executive order serves as a "just in case" safety net if ISPs happen to change their mind.
"New York State has a responsibility to ensure the efficient procurement of goods and services for the State of New York and its political subdivisions and the principles of net neutrality are inherently tied to the provision of high quality, high-speed broadband internet service for the State," the order says.
The FCC is currently under fire for allegedly using millions of fake comments to back its net neutrality repeal. The U.S. Government Accountability Office is investigating the issue based on claims that many comments were created by bots impersonating both the living and dead. They were provided in a comment system created by the FCC for receiving public feedback.
Prior to the net neutrality rules, there were no clear legal protections preventing ISPs from price gouging based on local monopolies, and adjusting the quality of service based on levels of internet consumption. There were many attempts to establish rules prior to 2015, but all failed. The FCC's rules served as a guarantee of an open, unregulated internet if any ISP desired to fall back on a model based on content filtering, speed throttling, and price gouging.
But that would be bad business and create a nasty, costly backlash. The executive order even says that "New York State is a significant purchaser of internet and broadband services." That revenue generator alone should help keep ISPs in check ... at least in New York.