Skip to main content

Qualcomm takes iPhone maker Foxconn to court over royalties dispute

Maurizio Pesce / Flickr
Qualcomm’s legal kerfuffle with Apple just escalated. The Sand Diego, California-based chip supplier filed a breach of contract suit late Tuesday against Foxconn, Pegatron, and two other manufacturers that Apple contracts to build the iPhone and iPad.

In documents submitted to San Diego Federal Court, Qualcomm alleges that Foxconn (also known as Hon Hai Precision Industry Co.), Pegatron Corp., Winstron Corp., and Compal Electronics refused to pay licensing fees on the company’s intellectual property.

All of Apple’s contract manufacturers, which are based in Taiwan but have manufacturing operations in China and elsewhere, have have patent license agreements with Qualcomm. Normally, Apple reimburses any royalties owed on patented technologies in the iPhone and iPad, but the company blocked Foxconn and others from paying last month.

Qualcomm, which is seeking $1 billion in damages, said its court action was in direct response to Apple’s decision.

“Apple is definitely behind this, and certainly what the contract manufacturers would say is the reason they are not paying,” Don Rosenberg, Qualcomm’s general counsel. told the Associated Press. “Our response to that is you are big, sophisticated companies. You have contractual obligations. You have license agreements with us that don’t involve Apple. You are responsible for paying that.”

Qualcomm’s legal action falls short of what some analysts expected. Last week, Bloomberg reported that Qualcomm would ask the United States International Trade Commission to issue an injunction prohibiting iPhone imports.

“While not disputing their contractual obligations to pay for the use of Qualcomm’s inventions, the manufacturers say they must follow Apple’s instructions not to pay,” Qualcomm said in a statement.

Over the better part of the year, Qualcomm and Apple have traded blows over what the chipmaker characterized as a “global attack.”

Qualcomm has been accused of government regulators that its patent licensing scheme, which ensnared electronic giants like Samsung and Intel, is “monopolistic.” The company owns cellular patents that it’s agreed to lease under “fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory” terms because they’re an essential part of the technology inside most smartphones. But Apple and licensees say that Qualcomm abused its market dominance to overcharge for patents and block competition.

The Korea Federal Trade Commission fined Qualcomm more than $850 million, and has sought to dismantle the company’s patent licensing. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed suit shortly after, and Samsung and Intel have filed briefs in support the FTC’s case.

Apple has pushed back more aggressively. Earlier this year, it withheld $1 billion in reimbursements on grounds that Qualcomm had violated a closed-doors agreement between the two companies in retaliation for Apple’s cooperation with regulators.

In response, Qualcomm’s counter-sued, appealing the Korea Fair Trade Commission decision and asking a Northern California federal judge to dismiss the FTC case.

Editors' Recommendations

Kyle Wiggers
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kyle Wiggers is a writer, Web designer, and podcaster with an acute interest in all things tech. When not reviewing gadgets…
I’ve used an iPhone for 14 years. The Pixel Fold made me want to stop
Google Pixel Fold in Obsidian open on Pixar Pier portrait mode.

When Steve Jobs took the stage on January 9, 2007, to unveil the original iPhone, everyone was amazed at the little piece of technology he held in his hand. Then in June 2007, people could buy and get their hands on the very first iPhone — and the scope of the cell phone industry changed forever.

I personally didn't get the original iPhone on launch day, believe it or not. Instead, I received it as a birthday present in 2008 (my very first Apple product), but my clumsy self eventually dropped it on cement four months later, and the screen shattered. But instead of getting it fixed, I figured I might as well just get the iPhone 3G since it was just a few weeks away from release.

Read more
I found a phone that fixes the iPhone 14 Pro Max’s biggest flaw
Vivo X90 Pro back.

The comfort of holding a smartphone is underrated, especially when you consider that most of us hold our phones for at least a quarter of the day. And, unfortunately, it seems like the comfortable form factor of a big phone is the least thought-out feature.

Take any flagship phone with a 6.5-inch+ screen size, for instance. The iPhone 14 Pro Max, Galaxy S23 Ultra, or Xiaomi 13 Pro all have one thing in common: they feature top-notch cameras but aren’t very comfortable to hold, either due to the poor flat edge design or weight distribution. Thankfully, one new smartphone — the Vivo X90 Pro — solves this problem.
A design Apple wishes it could copy

Read more
I love the Galaxy S23 — here are 5 things the iPhone still does better
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra and Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Samsung’s Galaxy S23 has arrived to the masses, and it’s one of the best Android phones you can get right now, especially the S23 Ultra. However, for those who don’t need all of the fancy bells and whistles, like the S Pen and 200MP main camera, the regular S23 is also plenty powerful for the average person, especially if you prefer smaller devices.

I’ve been using the Galaxy S23 for the past few weeks, and so far, my experience has been delightful. I know that it’s still early on in the year, but for me, the S23’s small size is perfect and comfortable. Android also does a lot of things better than iOS, like individual volume controls and notifications, for example. But I am still primarily using my iPhone 14 Pro — despite Apple having some big flaws, such as overprocessing images after you capture them.

Read more