It looks like we may not get backdoors in our phones for the government to use in spying on us after all. After the San Bernardino shootings, legislators pushed for a law requiring smartphone makers to build backdoors in smartphones, however it seems as though most of the support for those laws is gone, according to a report from Reuters.
Not only is much of the support gone, but sources for the Reuters report suggest that if the bill were to go to vote, it wouldn’t have much of a chance of being passed. Drafts of new legislation were circulated a few weeks ago despite the apparent dwindling of support for anti-encryption laws.
It’s not totally surprising that the bill is on its way out. Senators Richard Burr and Dianne Feinstein, who co-wrote the bill, never really had a firm timetable, and it’s often difficult to push new laws into legislation during an election year.
Of course, this is good news for privacy advocates and the general public. While the FBI has been using the example of terrorism as a reason for implementing these anti-encryption laws, the laws would essentially mean that the government could spy on any U.S. citizen, whether it has a reasonable basis for suspecting the person is involved with crime or not.
One of the main issues in pushing the bill has to do with a lack of White House support — so much so that former NSA and CIA director Michael Hayden recently said that the White House had “dropped the anchor and taken down the sail.”
Moreover, the FBI has largely stopped going after Apple in and out of court — although reports indicate that this is because the FBI has found someone else to hack into the iPhone. Still, the Department of Justice and the FBI are still pursuing other cases that involve hacking into other devices. So while the battle against Apple may be over for the most part, the larger fight is likely to rage on, as it has in one form or another for years.
Tech companies have largely sided with consumer groups, insisting that giving the government full access to smartphones essentially undermines security and is a threat to privacy in general.
- Breaking: Amazon won’t build headquarters in New York in face of opposition
- ‘Bill and Ted Face the Music’: Every excellent (and bogus) thing we know so far
- Encryption-busting law passed in Australia may have global privacy implications
- How much are the initials ‘LV’ worth? $700 if you put them on your earphones
- AMD Navi: Everything you need to know