Skip to main content

Snapchat blocks access to all third-party apps in bid to improve security

snapchat blocks access to all third party apps in bid improve security
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Snapchat suffered a nasty surprise back in October when a third-party app that archived images and videos posted to the ephemeral messaging app suffered a security breach that allowed hackers to get their hands on masses of private Snapchat content.

It was a big embarrassment for the startup, even though its own servers were not hit in the attack. Since then, it’s been working on ways to make it more difficult for third-party apps to access its content, which include asking Apple and Google to remove offending software from their app stores.

This week, however, Snapchat said it’s now found a way of reliably blocking all third-party apps from accessing the messaging software’s data. In doing so, the LA-based startup hopes to reduce the chances of further difficult incidents down the road, while improving users’ security.

The move appears to be part of an ongoing effort by Snapchat to portray itself as a more serious and responsible enterprise as it continues to attract marketers and investors to its fast-expanding product.

Speaking to Backchannel recently, Snapchat executives admitted the company should’ve been more assertive in cracking down on third-party apps that let users archive content, an action that was in direct conflict with the app’s main feature and consequently violated its terms of service.

“We never wanted third-party apps on our platform,” Snapchat’s Tim Sehn told Backchannel. “We have created a product where it is more critically important than ever before that we control the end user experience. We’ve made commitments to our users.”

Transparency report

News that Snapchat has shored up its security coincided with the publication of details of its first ever transparency report, due out in July. Similar to reports put out by tech giants like Apple, Microsoft, and Google, Snapchat promises to detail government requests received for users’ account information, government demands to remove users’ content, and requests to remove content that violates copyright law.

In a preview of July’s report, Snapchat revealed it received 375 information requests from the U.S. government in connection with 666 accounts from November 1, 2014 through February 28 of this year. Outside of the U.S., it received just 28 requests for 35 accounts.

This week’s developments come at a time of rapid expansion for Snapchat. Besides growing its user base, which most commentators put at between 100 million and 200 million, the company has also increased its team from 35 to 200 in the space of a year, and built out its app with a slew of new features.

The startup continues to attract huge amounts of investment, too, including some $486 million in late 2014, and a reported $200 million just recently, from Chinese Internet giant Alibaba.

Editors' Recommendations

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Instagram now lets you better manage third-party app access
how to get followers on instagram 7

Instagram’s latest feature lets you better manage the data you’re sharing with third-party apps and websites.

These might include, for example, photo-printing or website-building services that you had dealings with in the past, and which during setup asked for permission to “import photos from Instagram” or “connect/link to Instagram” to enable them to properly integrate.

Read more
Robocall-blocking apps might be sending your private data to third parties
cell phone companies stop robocalls after fcc vote robo calls feat

If you get a ton of robocalls, installing an app promising to block them might sound like a good idea. Robocalls are a huge problem, and a blocker seems like a quick and easy solution for improving the situation. Turns out, the apps might be violating your privacy starting from the second you open them.
A security consultant for the cybersecurity firm NCC Group took a look at some of the most popular robocall-blocking apps, and found a number of privacy violations, TechCrunch reports.
The apps they looked at include TrapCall, Hiya, and Truecaller. According to the firm, the apps will send user and/or device data to third-party analytics companies with the intent of monetizing your data, without asking for your expressed consent to do so. In many cases that information was also transmitted before a user was presented with the app’s privacy policy.
According to the firm, those apps are in violation of Apple’s guidelines which require an app to gain permission from a user before it sends any data to third parties.
The consultant argues that most smartphone users don’t have a technical background and are not able to tell what information is being shared with third parties. A privacy policy, which let’s face it most people don’t read, it really the only chance a user has to know where their information is being shared.
NCC Group contacted all of the apps in question about the privacy issues, but none of them made any changes until the group contacted Apple, after which TrapCall updated its privacy policy. Truecaller has reportedly since fixed the issue that allowed data to be sent when the app is opened.
Robocalls are becoming an increasingly larger problem for cell phone users. In June, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted to allow companies to block robocalls by default.
All of the major carriers in the United States currently offer some form of robocall blocking; however, customers have to opt-in for those services. The new FCC regulations allow carriers to block those calls without a user expressly opting in for them to do so -- though some wireless providers will now charge you for the privilege. 

Read more
Amazon can be held liable for third-party sales, court rules
amazon discounts third party seller items

Amazon’s gargantuan online shopping enterprise received an unwelcome jolt this week when a federal appeals court ruled that the company can be held liable for items sold by third-party sellers on its platform.

Wednesday’s ruling by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia reversed a lower court decision, and has the potential to expose Amazon to numerous lawsuits related to defective or counterfeit products sold by third-party sellers on its site, Reuters reported. Up to now, such lawsuits have been batted away by Amazon, but this may no longer be the case going forward.

Read more