Skip to main content

Third-party Snapchat client the source of leaked photos, videos

snapchat ditches white border adds group maps
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Update on October 13, 2014: An anonymous developer at has admitted on Facebook that its website was indeed hacked, and that Snapchat itself was not. The images did not originate from Snapchat’s servers, but was due to a “misconfiguration in (’s) Apache server.”

“As soon as we discovered the breach in our systems, we immediately deleted the entire website and the database associated with it. As far as we can tell, the breach has effected 500MB of images, and 0 personal information,” the developer wrote. says that usernames were not leaked, and says “the hacker does not have sufficient information to live up to his claims of creating a searchable database,” denying the rumor on the 4chan bulletin board that such a database exists. “Our users had to consent to all the content they received via…we tried to cleanse the database of inappropriate images as often as possible.”

Original story: The central idea behind Snapchat — and the one that’s helped it gain ground on rivals such as Facebook and Twitter — is that anything you post disappears after a few seconds. However, third-party apps can be used to store these vanishing pictures and videos, and it looks like one of these add-ons has now caused a leak of over 100,000 private images.

Details of the hack are difficult to pin down as the sites hosting the content are eager to remain under the radar, with child pornography charges being just one of several potential legal repercussions for anyone caught with the images. A report by ArsTechnica’s  Sean Gallagher suggests that 13GB of photos were collected and posted to 4chan, which has since taken steps to remove the relevant links.

Snapchat has commented on the issue but only to deny responsibility: “We can confirm that Snapchat’s servers were never breached, and were not the source of these leaks,” read a statement released to the press. “Snapchatters were victimized by their use of third-party apps to send and receive Snaps, a practice that we expressly prohibit in our Terms of Service precisely because they compromise our users’ security.”

It looks like the third-party website to blame is the now-defunct, which allowed users to save the snaps they received, though it’s not clear whether the plug-in was hacked or had malicious intentions all along. Snapchat does not have a public API but its code has been reverse-engineered to enable access by other developers.

The breach of security has been widely reported in the press, though in the wake of the nude celebrity photo hacking scandal it appears that those responsible are keeping as low a profile as possible this time around. As a result, we don’t know the specifics of the source of the leak or how much content has made it online, but it’s another reminder to think twice about the services and apps you use to store and transfer private material.

(This article was originally published on October 12, 2014.)

Editors' Recommendations

David Nield
Dave is a freelance journalist from Manchester in the north-west of England. He's been writing about technology since the…
I compared two of the year’s best phones in an extreme camera test
The Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra's rear panels.

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (left) and the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra. Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Apple versus Samsung is perhaps the ultimate battle in smartphones, and the iPhone 15 Pro Max and the Galaxy S23 Ultra are the two brand’s top devices. If you want one, you may have also looked at the other, and even if not, who doesn’t want to see a tough camera battle between these two heavyweights?

Read more
reMarkable 2 digital notebook just got a rare discount
A person using the reMarkable 2 to take notes.

The reMarkable 2, a tablet that mimics the feel of writing and reading on paper, is available from Best Buy right now with a rare $50 discount on a bundle that includes the Marker Plus writing instrument and the Book Folio case. Instead of $550, you'll only have to pay $500, which is still fairly expensive but it's very much worth it. We're not sure how much time is remaining on the offer though, so if you think this will be a better purchase than other tablet deals, you should push through with the transaction as soon as possible.

Why you should buy the reMarkable 2 paper tablet
The reMarkable 2, the successor to 2017's reMarkable, improves upon the premise of the original version of the tablet -- it's like a pen and paper with smart capabilities. There's no backlight or glare on the display of this device for an eye-friendly reading experience, much like reading from real paper, and there are no distractions so you can focus on your work. In comparison, using a stylus on a tablet feels unnatural because of the friction-less glass, while the bright screen will strain your eyes and the notifications from your apps will keep distracting you.

Read more
This strange accessory did something amazing to my iPad
Person working on iPad Pro with Xreal Air 2 connected.

Apple has been trying to sell the idea of using an iPad — the Pro model, specifically — as a legitimate computing machine for a while. It started with putting a Mac-borrowed M-series silicon inside the tablet, followed by bringing Stage Manager to the tablet.

Then came desktop-grade productivity apps like Final Cut Pro, Logic Pro, and Da Vinci Resolve, preceded by Microsoft 365 and Adobe’s editing tools. The ability to plug in an external monitor is also neat for a tablet, but that restricts you to a table.

Read more