Skip to main content

Anaïs in Love review: A breezy summer romance

Anaïs in Love is a film about a woman constantly in motion. Its opening scene follows its young heroine, Anaïs (played by Anaïs Demoustier), as she rushes through Paris to get back to the apartment where her exasperated landlord waits. Once there, Anaïs has no time for instructions on how to install a fire alarm (or pay her landlord the money she’s owed) because she has somewhere else to be — namely, a party she’s already late for.

The film follows Anaïs as she bounces — often at full speed — from place to place, conversation to conversation, and affair to affair, and the camera rarely ever stops or slows down. In fact, even in the occasional moments when Anaïs pauses to make a decision or ruminate on a difficult development, writer-director Charline Bourgeois-Tacquet usually keeps her camera in motion, slowly gliding toward and around her driven heroine, anxious to see what she’s going to do next.

Fortunately, Anaïs in Love never runs out of ways to keep its eponymous figure busy, which means she always has something to do and say — even in the moments when it’d probably be best if she didn’t. It’s a film that, much like the woman it follows so dutifully, can exasperate and charm with each turn it takes. But there’s also something that’s powerfully assuring about watching a character who will follow her interests and impulses so confidently, especially when they lead her toward a romance that surprises and delights with the pleasures it offers.

Following your desire

Anaïs Demoustier and Valeria Bruni Tedeschi look at each other in Anaïs in Love.
Magnolia Pictures, 2022

That’s precisely what happens after Anaïs sees a painting of Emilie (Valeria Bruni Tedeschi), the partner of a man Anaïs has begun a lackluster affair with. Drawn toward Emilie’s image, Anaïs begins to read Emilie’s novels and, in one of the film’s best scenes, smells and holds her cosmetic products. Each action just makes Anaïs feel a greater attraction to Emilie, and after a chance meeting in the street lives up to her expectations, Anaïs follows Emilie on a writer’s retreat in the hopes of further developing their relationship.

What follows is a bubbly and charming courtship that carries more than its fair share of underlying passion and intensity. Demoustier brings a breathless, feisty energy to the film, playing Anaïs as a woman who makes you realize just how limiting the term “likability” really is. Opposite her, Tedeschi plays Emilie as a calm and contemplative woman, one who is fascinated and flattered in equal measure by Anaïs’ very obvious seduction efforts. At one point, the two performers lower and raise their energies to meet each other’s during a sensual dance scene that is set to Bette Davis Eyes.

Worth the risk

Their romance is brilliantly controlled and paced by Bourgeois-Tacquet. The writer-director’s script is funny and wry in the way it should be, but far more subversive and intelligent than it makes itself out to be. The film is also full of ingenious touches and simple but effective visual gags, like the moment when Emilie’s partner (and Anaïs’ former lover) shows up wearing a blue blazer and red shirt in the same scene where Emilie is wearing a blue dress and Anaïs a red one. Noé Bach’s cinematography, meanwhile, makes the film look bright and warm in a way that just further accentuates its summer romance plot.

Anaïs in Love - Official Trailer

In other words, it’s a visually pleasing film to watch, which makes sense given how focused Bourgeois-Tacquet’s script is on the importance of pursuing one’s desires. At times, that focus results in Anaïs in Love trying your patience, and not all of its various detours lead to interesting outcomes. But Anaïs in Love is also a film that understands what can happen when a person’s decision to pursue their desires actually pays off. Sometimes, the risk really is worth the reward.

Anaïs in Love will be released in theaters on April 29 and will become available on demand on May 6.

Editors' Recommendations

Alex Welch
Alex Welch is a TV and movies writer based out of Los Angeles. In addition to Digital Trends, his work has been published by…
Conversations with A Killer: The Jeffrey Dahmer Tapes review: killer’s words yield little insight
A superimposed image of Jeffrey Dahmer in Conversations with a Killer.

It’s spooky season this month, and that means the atrocity mine is currently being plundered by content creators across America. The three-episode docuseries Conversations with a Killer: The Jeffrey Dahmer Tapes, directed by noted documentarian Joe Berlinger (Brother's Keeper, Paradise Lost), is Netflix’s second project tackling the infamous cannibal/necrophiliac/serial killer to debut in a matter of weeks. It follows Ryan Murphy’s 10-hour miniseries drama, Dahmer-Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story. This Dahmer double dose mirrors the barrage of Ted Bundy content that Netflix put out in early 2019, following up the Zac Efron-led drama Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile with the docuseries Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes (also directed by Berlinger). 

As was the case with Bundy, Netflix is convinced that a multipronged examination of Dahmer could lead to a better understanding of his psychology and motivations, teaching viewers warning signs or expanding our capacity for empathy. Or maybe they recognize that people are addicted to unspeakable tragedies and will do anything they can to maximize viewers’ compulsion for true crime? Attempting to satisfy on all accounts, The Dahmer Tapes oscillates uneasily between character study, social commentary, and pure shock value, landing somewhere in between all three.
In Dahmer's own words

Read more
Amsterdam review: An exhausting, overlong conspiracy thriller
Christian Bale, Margot Robbie, and John David Washington walk through a lobby together in Amsterdam.

Amsterdam could have been forgiven for being a lot of things, but dull is not one of them. The new film from writer-director David O. Russell boasts one of the most impressive ensemble casts of the year and is photographed by Emmanuel Lubezki, one of Hollywood’s premier cinematographers. Beyond that, its kooky premise and even wackier cast of characters open the door for Amsterdam to be the kind of screwball murder mystery that O. Russell, at the very least, seems uniquely well-equipped to make.

Instead, Amsterdam is a disaster of the highest order. It’s a film made up of so many disparate, incongruent parts that it becomes clear very early on in its 134-minute runtime that no one involved — O. Russell most of all — really knew what it is they were making. It is a misfire of epic proportions, a comedic conspiracy thriller that is written like a haphazard screwball comedy but paced like a meandering detective drama. Every element seems to be at odds with another, resulting in a film that is rarely funny but consistently irritating.

Read more
Significant Other review: a scary kind of love
Maika Monroe stares at the camera while lying down.

Forests can be scary. Love can be even scarier. Combine the two and throw in a few wild twists for good measure, and you get Significant Other, a uniquely terrifying thriller about a couple whose romantic hike in the woods takes an unexpected turn when they begin to suspect they might not be alone in the wilds.

Written and directed by Dan Berk and Robert Olsen, Significant Other casts Maika Monroe (It Follows) and Jake Lacy (The White Lotus) as Ruth and Harry, respectively, a young couple who head off into the forests of the Pacific Northwest for some hiking and camping. Harry intends to propose to Ruth, but the pair's adventure takes a deadly turn when they discover something sinister in the woods.

Read more