Skip to main content

How much would it cost to build and run a real-world version of Jurassic Park?

Sure, it only took one film to explain why a theme park filled with real, live dinosaurs might not be a good idea, but one thing that hasn’t been explored (until now, that is) is what kind of monetary costs would be involved in creating a Jurassic Park. However, a new video offers a pretty impressive assessment of just how much it would cost to run a real-world version of Jurassic Park, and the results are fascinating.

In short, it’s a lot cheaper to make a movie about Jurassic Park than to build and maintain a real one.

Recommended Videos

Fandango’s Movieclips channel assembled a team of researchers to estimate the financial costs of creating a dinosaur theme park, from the cost of the real estate required for the venture to the salaries of the staff necessary to get the park running and keep it running on a daily basis. Using real-world rates associated with everything from genetic cloning to mining for amber that will contain the mosquitoes holding dinosaur DNA, the analysis approximates the opening cost of Jurassic Park to be around $23 billion, with $12 million in recurring annual operation costs.

Given that the production budgets for all four films in the franchise so far add up to about $350-450 million and the films have collectively earned more than $2.4 billion so far, it seems like movies are the way to go when it comes to dinosaur theme parks.

Still, it’s interesting to see the real-world costs associated with some of the elements of the Jurassic Park universe that we take for granted amid all of the dinosaur-friendly spectacle and the inevitable running and screaming. For example, the cost of acquiring the two islands in Costa Rica necessary for both the park itself and the site where the dinosaurs are raised before being brought to the park would run about $10 billion at current real-estate estimates, making this portion of park development one of the most costly elements of the entire operation.

More than anything else, the video makes it pretty clear that Jurassic Park might be a nice place to visit (when the dinosaurs aren’t running around eating people, of course), but you wouldn’t want to actually invest in it.

Rick Marshall
Former Contributing Editor, Entertainment
A veteran journalist with more than two decades of experience covering local and national news, arts and entertainment, and…
What it’s like to be Jurassic World’s live-action dinosaur wrangler
A Giganotosaurus model looms in the foreground of a scene from Jurassic World Dominion.

Director Colin Trevorrow wrapped up the modern Jurassic World trilogy in dramatic (and familiar) fashion with Jurassic World Dominion, which brought back many of the original characters and dinosaurs from the original Jurassic Park films.

The Dominion team did so with a mix of practical and visual effects, in keeping with the franchise's storied tradition of mixing in-camera movie magic with groundbreaking digital animation techniques. In addition to a visual effects team led by ILM's David Vickery, Dominion relied on John Nolan Studio to create practical, animatronic creatures that added a physical component to the film's menagerie.

Read more
How Jurassic World Dominion’s VFX made old dinosaurs new again
Two dinosaurs look at each other in Jurassic World Dominion.

The Jurassic World trilogy concluded in epic, roaring fashion with Jurassic World Dominion, which brought the franchise full circle in multiple ways. Not only did Dominion bring back Jurassic World director Colin Trevorrow behind the camera, but it also reunited the modern trilogy's stars, Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard, with those of the original Jurassic Park: Sam Neill, Laura Dern, and Jeff Goldblum.

Dominion also featured the return of some popular dinosaurs from the original trilogy, as well as the introduction of a few amazing -- and terrifying -- new dinosaurs, too. Blending all of these fresh and familiar elements together was no small feat. Digital Trends spoke to the film's visual effects supervisor, Academy Award nominee David Vickery, about the "digital paleontology" his team performed while revisiting the franchise's past in Jurassic World Dominion.

Read more
Yes, they’re bad, but the Jurassic World movies are fun too
The cast of Jurassic World: Dominion stares up at an approaching dinosaur.

Jurassic World Dominion remained atop the box office during its second weekend, mainly because Lightyear severely underperformed. Despite Dominion's negative critical reception, it's undeniable that the film is a hit with audiences; it has an A- on CinemaScore and a 78% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes. Sure, those two aren't exactly badges of honor when talking about quality, but they sure as hell are indicators of a film's potential success at the box office and longevity in streaming services.

We look down at most modern blockbusters because they offer us nothing beyond the cheap thrills of their basic premises. And although recent examples -- Dune, The Batman, Top Gun: Maverick -- have proven there is space for depth and nuance in major motion pictures, most modern blockbusters remain firmly set on the repetitive and by-the-numbers approach spearheaded by the superhero genre and championed by the Marvel Cinematic Universe. However, there is something noteworthy -- dare we say, admirable -- in a film that knows what it is, who it's for, and what its ultimate goal is. After all, a blockbuster's purpose is to entertain. More than any other type of film, a blockbuster should keep audiences happy for the required two hours. While it can have a deeper meaning, an extra layer of sentimentality, or a thought-provoking message, at its core, the blockbuster exists to entertain its spectacle-hungry audience.

Read more