Skip to main content

How much would it cost to build and run a real-world version of Jurassic Park?

How Much Would it Cost to Build Jurassic Park?
Sure, it only took one film to explain why a theme park filled with real, live dinosaurs might not be a good idea, but one thing that hasn’t been explored (until now, that is) is what kind of monetary costs would be involved in creating a Jurassic Park. However, a new video offers a pretty impressive assessment of just how much it would cost to run a real-world version of Jurassic Park, and the results are fascinating.

In short, it’s a lot cheaper to make a movie about Jurassic Park than to build and maintain a real one.

Recommended Videos

Fandango’s Movieclips channel assembled a team of researchers to estimate the financial costs of creating a dinosaur theme park, from the cost of the real estate required for the venture to the salaries of the staff necessary to get the park running and keep it running on a daily basis. Using real-world rates associated with everything from genetic cloning to mining for amber that will contain the mosquitoes holding dinosaur DNA, the analysis approximates the opening cost of Jurassic Park to be around $23 billion, with $12 million in recurring annual operation costs.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

Given that the production budgets for all four films in the franchise so far add up to about $350-450 million and the films have collectively earned more than $2.4 billion so far, it seems like movies are the way to go when it comes to dinosaur theme parks.

Still, it’s interesting to see the real-world costs associated with some of the elements of the Jurassic Park universe that we take for granted amid all of the dinosaur-friendly spectacle and the inevitable running and screaming. For example, the cost of acquiring the two islands in Costa Rica necessary for both the park itself and the site where the dinosaurs are raised before being brought to the park would run about $10 billion at current real-estate estimates, making this portion of park development one of the most costly elements of the entire operation.

More than anything else, the video makes it pretty clear that Jurassic Park might be a nice place to visit (when the dinosaurs aren’t running around eating people, of course), but you wouldn’t want to actually invest in it.

Rick Marshall
A veteran journalist with more than two decades of experience covering local and national news, arts and entertainment, and…
Yes, they’re bad, but the Jurassic World movies are fun too
The cast of Jurassic World: Dominion stares up at an approaching dinosaur.

Jurassic World Dominion remained atop the box office during its second weekend, mainly because Lightyear severely underperformed. Despite Dominion's negative critical reception, it's undeniable that the film is a hit with audiences; it has an A- on CinemaScore and a 78% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes. Sure, those two aren't exactly badges of honor when talking about quality, but they sure as hell are indicators of a film's potential success at the box office and longevity in streaming services.

We look down at most modern blockbusters because they offer us nothing beyond the cheap thrills of their basic premises. And although recent examples -- Dune, The Batman, Top Gun: Maverick -- have proven there is space for depth and nuance in major motion pictures, most modern blockbusters remain firmly set on the repetitive and by-the-numbers approach spearheaded by the superhero genre and championed by the Marvel Cinematic Universe. However, there is something noteworthy -- dare we say, admirable -- in a film that knows what it is, who it's for, and what its ultimate goal is. After all, a blockbuster's purpose is to entertain. More than any other type of film, a blockbuster should keep audiences happy for the required two hours. While it can have a deeper meaning, an extra layer of sentimentality, or a thought-provoking message, at its core, the blockbuster exists to entertain its spectacle-hungry audience.

Read more
Sorry Millennials, but Jurassic Park was never a good movie
A child hides from raptors in the kitchen in Jurassic Park.

Jurassic World Dominion opened to big box office this past weekend, along with some of the worst reviews of the six-movie franchise -- a 30% score on Rotten Tomatoes -- which is saying something, given that most of the entries in this series have been panned by critics.

And yet, it's really not all that surprising that the films that sprung from the source have all been of negligible quality, given that the original 1993 Jurassic Park, directed by Steven Spielberg from the bestseller by Michael Crichton, really wasn't very good to begin with. Yes, it earned solid reviews at the time (along with grumblings by Roger Ebert and others), and, yes, it remains treasured by '90s kids. But looking at it without the lens of nostalgia or the excitement over digital dinosaurs that fueled its initial success, I argue that it doesn't hold up well at all.

Read more
5 games to play if you liked Jurassic World Dominion
A dinosaur roaring in Jurassic World Evolution 2.

Jurassic World Dominion is out to close the six-movie storyline that began with Steven Spielberg's all-time classic, but there are other ways for fans to satiate their appetite for dinosaur-themed content after leaving the theaters. Given the natural mainstream appeal of these awe-inspiring animals from the prehistoric ages, blockbuster IPs like Jurassic Park naturally paved the way for tie-in media when it comes to video games.

The most recent example would be developer Frontier Developments' Jurassic World Evolution 2 to help coincide with the newly released movie, but there are other dinosaur-themed -- or dinosaur-adjacent -- video games worth checking out outside of the synonymous Hollywood IP. Whether it's park simulators, action RPGs, or survival games, there's something for everyone to indulge their inner dinosaur enthusiast.
Jurassic World Evolution 2 (2021)

Read more