Skip to main content

Our Idiot Brother Review

our-idiot-brother-posterI have a shocking announcement to make — you may want to sit down for this. Are you seated? Do you have a glass of water nearby just in case? OK, here goes: Most of the films being made these days are not all that original. I know, crazy right? What with the Remake-o-Tron going at full spin, and the 1849 goldrush-like pursuit of any property that may someday, perhaps possibly be made into a movie, the truly original screenplays seem to have died quick death. There are a few exceptions, but Our Idiot Brother is not one of them.

That doesn’t make it a bad movie, but it is not an original one, either. It isn’t a remake, but the plot — while it has some original moments — is nothing you haven’t seen before in a light-hearted comedy. But comedies are all about the execution performances, and Our Idiot Brother is solid in both categories.

Recommended Videos

You will have to be able to turn your brain off and overlook some plot points that don’t really make much sense under closer scrutiny, but if you can, you’ll be left with a fairly enjoyable, and familiar movie.

Our idiot plot

Ned (Paul Rudd) is an idiot. He is a likable idiot, and his idiocy comes more from a naïve sense of trust that he clings to than a lack of intelligence, but his good nature leads him, and those around him, into trouble more often than not. He is an idealist who believes that everyone deserves the benefit of the doubt, which can lead to some endearing moments. The flipside of that is that it can lead to some “bull in the China shop” moments when he doesn’t understand the sometimes-unfortunate need for guile in the modern world.

After spending a few months in jail for selling marijuana — to a uniformed police officer — Ned returns home to find that things have changed on the organic farm that his girlfriend Janet (Kathryn Hahn) runs. It turns out that Janet is a slightly awful person, and Ned is forced to stay with family while figuring out his next step.

After a brief stay with his Mom (Shirley Knight), Ned reaches out to his sisters: The family-oriented Liz (Emily Mortimer), the career-focused reporter Miranda (Elizabeth Banks) and the bisexual free spirit Natalie (Zooey Deschanel). Each of the sisters thinks that their lives are on track, but as Ned stomps through those lives, he accidentally brings existing problems to the surface, for which the sisters all blame him.

our_idiot_brother
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Things eventually reach a boiling point as the sisters, who look down on Ned as the “idiot brother,” are forced to confront the problems that have always been there but they were unable — or unwilling to see.

It is a bit surprising that this movie went for the R rating, as it is almost completely unnecessary. It would have been a fairly simple matter to make this PG-13 — even PG — and expand the audience base. It is even more surprising given how tame much of this movie is. Ned can be a bit of an idiot, but he is just a catalyst to the problems he causes, and is usually just a light catalyst at that. Neither the character nor the film really push the boundaries, which makes the R rating both unnecessary, and something of a wasted opportunity.

Ned’s foils

It isn’t exactly an original idea, but it works thanks to some good jokes and better performances. While Ned is the star, and the three sisters are all integral parts played by well-known actresses, each of the sisters also has a person in their lives that is part of their problem, one way or the other — and all three are also known actors. In Liz’s life it is her husband Dylan (Steve Coogan), Miranda’s is her best friend and neighbor Jeremy (Adam Scott), and for Natalie it is her girlfriend (Rashida Jones). This is where Our Idiot Brother has a bit of an advantage on many other stories of a person bringing wackiness to the structured lives of people.

Our_idiot_brother_sisters
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Each of the characters has their own quirks and points-of-view. That isn’t to say that they are all fleshed out, but without the solid cast that Our Idiot Brother has, the film would likely have felt hollow and forgettable. Instead it is still a bit forgettable, but enjoyable.

Every character in the film ends up orbiting Ned in some way. That takes a bit away from their own stories, but it makes for a better movie as a result. They are all foils to Ned’s idiocy, which puts the onus of the movie on Paul Rudd. He does a good job as a likable doofus. The plot quickly becomes a paint-by-numbers affair with a predictable “feel good” course locked in, but the journey there is helped along by Rudd’s charisma. There are a few groan-worthy moments, and plot inconstancies that only exist to further the plot despite their lack of logic — little things like why a good-hearted guy like Ned would date a woman like Janet for three years and never see what a terrible person she was — but those are all easily overlooked.

Conclusion

Director Jesse Pertez (The Ex) manages to string the lives of Ned and his sisters together well thanks to strong performances from the entire cast. The plot is not exactly original, and the word “predictable” springs to mind. The word “inoffensive” also has a place in the conversation.

Paul-Rudd-My-Idiot-Brother
Image used with permission by copyright holder

From the start, once you have a good idea of what is going on in the lives of the sisters, you can probably guess where that particular story thread will take you. The path they take to get there is what makes this movie fun. That and Paul Rudd, who hucks this film on his back and makes what could have been a lifeless flick into a fun and watchable one.

If you are looking for a fun and simple movie that is well acted and will leave you with that “feel-good” shine that only a Hollywood movie can offer, Our Idiot Brother is a great pick. At times it is a fairly tame, and again, the R rating is slightly baffling for a comedy like this. It never really approaches “edgy,” which you might expect based on the rating, but it still has enough humor and likability to justify itself.

(Our Idiot Brother is Rated R, with a running time of 90 minutes)

Ryan Fleming
Former Gaming/Movies Editor
Ryan Fleming is the Gaming and Cinema Editor for Digital Trends. He joined the DT staff in 2009 after spending time covering…
Decision to Leave review: An achingly romantic noir thriller
Tang Wei looks at Park Hae-il in Park Chan-wook's Decision to Leave.

With its lush sets and perpetually probing camera, Decision to Leave looks and moves like any other Park Chan-wook film, but it reverberates with the same untempered passion present in Golden Age noirs like In a Lonely Place and Double Indemnity. Unlike those two films, though, which center their stories around a hot-tempered screenwriter and naïve insurance salesman, respectively, Decision to Leave follows another common noir archetype: the lovelorn detective (played here by Park Hae-il).

In the film’s opening moments, Hae-jun, the detective in question, lands a case involving the mysterious death of a recreational rock climber. The case, in typical noir fashion, leads to Hae-jun crossing paths with Seo-rae (a spellbinding Tang Wei), his victim’s gorgeous but eccentric widow. Perturbed by how disinterested she is in unpacking her abusive husband’s death, Hae-jun begins to tail and spy on Seo-rae, unaware that doing so will only further intensify his attraction to her. As far as noir plots go, this is about as familiar as it gets. With its nods to Hitchcock and lightly self-aware attitude, Decision to Leave makes it clear that it doesn’t mind treading the same narrative terrain as so many of the noir classics that have come before it, either.

Read more
Operation Seawolf review: nice Nazis? No thanks!
Dolph Lundgren holds onto a pipe inside a U-Boat in a scene from Operation Seawolf.

At a time when anti-Semitic extremists are storming the U.S Capitol, running for office, and declaring war on Jewish people via social media, it might not be the best time for a movie that expects you to sympathize with Nazis. And yet, that hasn't stopped Operation Seawolf from sailing into theaters and on-demand streaming services this month.

The film, which follows the crew of a German U-boat during the waning days of World War II, casts Dolph Lundgren (Rocky IV) as German war hero Capt. Hans Kessler, who's ordered to lead the Nazis' remaining U-boats on a desperate (and likely fatal) mission to attack the U.S. on its own soil. As he and his crew make their way toward New York City in one final bid to turn the tide of war, Kessler finds himself struggling with both the internal politics of the ship and his own sense of duty as the Third Reich crumbles around him.

Read more
Conversations with A Killer: The Jeffrey Dahmer Tapes review: killer’s words yield little insight
A superimposed image of Jeffrey Dahmer in Conversations with a Killer.

It’s spooky season this month, and that means the atrocity mine is currently being plundered by content creators across America. The three-episode docuseries Conversations with a Killer: The Jeffrey Dahmer Tapes, directed by noted documentarian Joe Berlinger (Brother's Keeper, Paradise Lost), is Netflix’s second project tackling the infamous cannibal/necrophiliac/serial killer to debut in a matter of weeks. It follows Ryan Murphy’s 10-hour miniseries drama, Dahmer-Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story. This Dahmer double dose mirrors the barrage of Ted Bundy content that Netflix put out in early 2019, following up the Zac Efron-led drama Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile with the docuseries Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes (also directed by Berlinger). 

As was the case with Bundy, Netflix is convinced that a multipronged examination of Dahmer could lead to a better understanding of his psychology and motivations, teaching viewers warning signs or expanding our capacity for empathy. Or maybe they recognize that people are addicted to unspeakable tragedies and will do anything they can to maximize viewers’ compulsion for true crime? Attempting to satisfy on all accounts, The Dahmer Tapes oscillates uneasily between character study, social commentary, and pure shock value, landing somewhere in between all three.
In Dahmer's own words

Read more