Skip to main content

The School for Good and Evil review: Middling magic

Adaptations of young-adult fantasy literature have always been a little hit-or-miss, but that hasn’t stopped Hollywood from churning them out — and occasionally putting plenty of star power behind them, too.

Director Paul Feig’s The School For Good and Evil is the latest film to bring a popular YA series to the screen, and is based on Soman Chainani’s 2013 novel of the same name, which went on to spawn five sequels set in its fairy-tale universe. Along with its core cast of young actors, the film also features an impressive lineup of A-listers in supporting roles, and their presence keeps an otherwise formulaic fantasy adventure entertaining.

Sofia Wylie and Sophia Anne Caruso hold hands and smile in a scene from Th School For Good and Evil.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

A fairy-tale cast

Co-written by Feig and Academy Award nominee David Magee (Finding Neverland), The School For Good and Evil follows best friends Agatha  and Sophie, played by Sofia Wylie and Sophia Anne Caruso, respectively, whose mundane lives are upended when they find themselves spirited away to a magical school where heroes and villains are trained for fairy-tale adventures. Sophie’s belief that her placement in the School of Evil is a mistake complicates the duo’s arrival, and the entire school is quickly thrown into disarray when sinister forces conspire to benefit from all the chaos.

Wylie and Caruso are joined in the cast by Kerry Washington and Charlize Theron as the head professors at the schools for good and evil, respectively. Laurence Fishburne portrays the school’s headmaster, while Michelle Yeoh plays another professor at the school for good, and Cate Blanchett voices the school’s historian — a magical, sentient quill forever recording the students’ stories.

Serving double duty on two YA properties while playing dual roles in The School For Good and Evil, actor Kit Young (Shadow and Bone) plays both of the two powerful brothers whose rivalry led to the creation of the school.

Michelle Yeoh, Charlize Theron, and Kerry Washington stand together in a scene from Th School for Good and Evil.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The supporting stars shine

Wylie and Caruso do a fine job of keeping the story rolling along, even as it heads in predictable directions a little too frequently. The pair’s on-screen chemistry doesn’t quite scream “lifelong friends” or match up with the intense loyalty they profess to have for each other, but the two actresses have fun with their respective roles — particularly Caruso, who throws herself into the opportunity to play both ditzy princess and vamping villain archetypes.

Given the high profiles of the film’s supporting cast, it shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that the two leads are often overshadowed by the veteran actors around them, but it’s still a bit disappointing to see Wylie and Caruso’s characters fade into the background as often as they do. Theron is always great in villain roles (or any role, for that matter), and takes full advantage of the opportunity to camp it up as the playfully sinister Lady Lesso. Washington and Yeoh similarly elevate their goody-goody roles from obnoxiously positive to over-the-top silly, keeping the story fully rooted in its fairytale aesthetic.

And although he’s given minimal screen time in the film, Young continues to make a strong case for himself as an actor who enriches anything he’s in these days, whether it’s playing a charming gunslinger in Shadow and Bone or the avatars of good and evil in this film.

Sophia Anne Caruso and Sofia Wylie walk down a stret together in a scene from The School For Good and Evil.
Netflix

A very long tale

While the underlying story in The School For Good and Evil doesn’t offer much in the way of surprises and occasionally seems to get lost in the mythology of its own universe, the performances of the film’s cast are generally enough to maintain the film’s energy. Their ability to do so is tested, though, by the film’s surprisingly long running time, which clocks in at nearly two-and-a-half hours.

The aforementioned performances and a parade of visual effects-heavy sequences do a nice job of keeping your eyes off the clock, but The School For Good and Evil never quite justifies its lengthy running time with the sort of expansive story or world-building you expect from that level of time investment. It’s a pretty-looking (and pretty funny) film with some promising narrative threads for future sequels or spin-ffs, but even the most entertaining elements of the film wear a little thin around the second hour.

Overall length aside, The School For Good and Evil delivers just enough on its potential to provide a stable foundation for what Netflix is certainly hoping will become a new fantasy franchise. The world it introduces is full of potential — as limitless as the number of fair tales, fables, and legends it can draw from, in fact. That’s a lot of source material, but only time will tell if audiences give it the level of attention Netflix would need to expand on the premise and lore introduced in the film.

While it falls a bit short of being the next big thing for YA fantasy adaptations or its streaming home, Netflix, The School For Good and Evil provides enough intriguing, entertaining, and otherwise satisfying elements to give it a fighting chance in a crowded genre. Its impressive supporting cast delivers some of the film’s best moments, but don’t be surprised if its extended running time makes you eager to hear the school’s dismissal bell.

Directed by Paul Feig, The School For Good and Evil premieres October 19 on Netflix.

The School for Good and Evil (2022)

The School for Good and Evil
146m
Genre
Fantasy, Action, Drama
Stars
Sophia Anne Caruso, Sofia Wylie, Laurence Fishburne
Directed by
Paul Feig
Watch on Netflix
Movie images and data from:
Rick Marshall
A veteran journalist with more than two decades of experience covering local and national news, arts and entertainment, and…
Conversations with A Killer: The Jeffrey Dahmer Tapes review: killer’s words yield little insight
A superimposed image of Jeffrey Dahmer in Conversations with a Killer.

It’s spooky season this month, and that means the atrocity mine is currently being plundered by content creators across America. The three-episode docuseries Conversations with a Killer: The Jeffrey Dahmer Tapes, directed by noted documentarian Joe Berlinger (Brother's Keeper, Paradise Lost), is Netflix’s second project tackling the infamous cannibal/necrophiliac/serial killer to debut in a matter of weeks. It follows Ryan Murphy’s 10-hour miniseries drama, Dahmer-Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story. This Dahmer double dose mirrors the barrage of Ted Bundy content that Netflix put out in early 2019, following up the Zac Efron-led drama Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile with the docuseries Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes (also directed by Berlinger). 

As was the case with Bundy, Netflix is convinced that a multipronged examination of Dahmer could lead to a better understanding of his psychology and motivations, teaching viewers warning signs or expanding our capacity for empathy. Or maybe they recognize that people are addicted to unspeakable tragedies and will do anything they can to maximize viewers’ compulsion for true crime? Attempting to satisfy on all accounts, The Dahmer Tapes oscillates uneasily between character study, social commentary, and pure shock value, landing somewhere in between all three.
In Dahmer's own words

Read more
Smile review: A cruelly scary studio horror movie
Caitlin Stasey smiles, unnervingly.

The alarm has been tripped. The backdoor is wide open. And who or whatever’s impersonating the security-system operator on the other end of the phone line has just croaked three words that no horror movie character would ever want to hear: “Look behind you.” The command puts Rose (Sosie Bacon), the increasingly petrified heroine of Smile, between a rock and a hard place. She has to look, even if every fiber of her being would rather not. And so does the audience. We’re locked into her campfire crucible, forced to follow the hesitant backward tilt of her gaze, and the anticipatory creep of a camera that’s slow to reveal what that disembodied voice has invited her (and us) to discover.

Smile is full of moments like this. It’s a nasty, diabolically calibrated multiplex scream machine — the kind of movie that sends ripples of nervous laughter through packed theaters, the kind that marionettes the whole crowd into a synchronized dance routine of frazzled nerves and spilled popcorn. Turn up your nose, if you must, at the lowly cheap sting of a jump scare. Smile gives that maligned device a workout for the ages. It rattles with aplomb.

Read more
My Best Friend’s Exorcism review: Fighting mean girls (and meaner demons)
Elsie Fisher and Amiah Miller sit on a bed in a scene from My Best Friend's Exorcism.

The teenage years can be scary, even without the threat of demonic possession. Throw a sinister supernatural element into the mix, and the experience becomes, well ... only slightly more terrifying, actually.

That's one takeaway from director Damon Thomas' My Best Friend's Exorcism, which delivers a scary-fun paranormal thriller filtered through a coming-of-age drama about two teenage girls in the 1980s whose lifelong friendship is threatened when one of them becomes the unwilling host of an infernal entity. That this supernatural encounter occurs while the girls are navigating young adulthood turns the typical social hellscape of high school into something more sinister, and tests their friendship in unexpected and terrifying ways.

Read more