Skip to main content

The School for Good and Evil review: Middling magic

Adaptations of young-adult fantasy literature have always been a little hit-or-miss, but that hasn’t stopped Hollywood from churning them out — and occasionally putting plenty of star power behind them, too.

Director Paul Feig’s The School For Good and Evil is the latest film to bring a popular YA series to the screen, and is based on Soman Chainani’s 2013 novel of the same name, which went on to spawn five sequels set in its fairy-tale universe. Along with its core cast of young actors, the film also features an impressive lineup of A-listers in supporting roles, and their presence keeps an otherwise formulaic fantasy adventure entertaining.

Sofia Wylie and Sophia Anne Caruso hold hands and smile in a scene from Th School For Good and Evil.

A fairy-tale cast

Co-written by Feig and Academy Award nominee David Magee (Finding Neverland), The School For Good and Evil follows best friends Agatha  and Sophie, played by Sofia Wylie and Sophia Anne Caruso, respectively, whose mundane lives are upended when they find themselves spirited away to a magical school where heroes and villains are trained for fairy-tale adventures. Sophie’s belief that her placement in the School of Evil is a mistake complicates the duo’s arrival, and the entire school is quickly thrown into disarray when sinister forces conspire to benefit from all the chaos.

Wylie and Caruso are joined in the cast by Kerry Washington and Charlize Theron as the head professors at the schools for good and evil, respectively. Laurence Fishburne portrays the school’s headmaster, while Michelle Yeoh plays another professor at the school for good, and Cate Blanchett voices the school’s historian — a magical, sentient quill forever recording the students’ stories.

Serving double duty on two YA properties while playing dual roles in The School For Good and Evil, actor Kit Young (Shadow and Bone) plays both of the two powerful brothers whose rivalry led to the creation of the school.

Michelle Yeoh, Charlize Theron, and Kerry Washington stand together in a scene from Th School for Good and Evil.

The supporting stars shine

Wylie and Caruso do a fine job of keeping the story rolling along, even as it heads in predictable directions a little too frequently. The pair’s on-screen chemistry doesn’t quite scream “lifelong friends” or match up with the intense loyalty they profess to have for each other, but the two actresses have fun with their respective roles — particularly Caruso, who throws herself into the opportunity to play both ditzy princess and vamping villain archetypes.

Given the high profiles of the film’s supporting cast, it shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that the two leads are often overshadowed by the veteran actors around them, but it’s still a bit disappointing to see Wylie and Caruso’s characters fade into the background as often as they do. Theron is always great in villain roles (or any role, for that matter), and takes full advantage of the opportunity to camp it up as the playfully sinister Lady Lesso. Washington and Yeoh similarly elevate their goody-goody roles from obnoxiously positive to over-the-top silly, keeping the story fully rooted in its fairytale aesthetic.

And although he’s given minimal screen time in the film, Young continues to make a strong case for himself as an actor who enriches anything he’s in these days, whether it’s playing a charming gunslinger in Shadow and Bone or the avatars of good and evil in this film.

Sophia Anne Caruso and Sofia Wylie walk down a stret together in a scene from The School For Good and Evil.

A very long tale

While the underlying story in The School For Good and Evil doesn’t offer much in the way of surprises and occasionally seems to get lost in the mythology of its own universe, the performances of the film’s cast are generally enough to maintain the film’s energy. Their ability to do so is tested, though, by the film’s surprisingly long running time, which clocks in at nearly two-and-a-half hours.

The aforementioned performances and a parade of visual effects-heavy sequences do a nice job of keeping your eyes off the clock, but The School For Good and Evil never quite justifies its lengthy running time with the sort of expansive story or world-building you expect from that level of time investment. It’s a pretty-looking (and pretty funny) film with some promising narrative threads for future sequels or spin-ffs, but even the most entertaining elements of the film wear a little thin around the second hour.

Overall length aside, The School For Good and Evil delivers just enough on its potential to provide a stable foundation for what Netflix is certainly hoping will become a new fantasy franchise. The world it introduces is full of potential — as limitless as the number of fair tales, fables, and legends it can draw from, in fact. That’s a lot of source material, but only time will tell if audiences give it the level of attention Netflix would need to expand on the premise and lore introduced in the film.

While it falls a bit short of being the next big thing for YA fantasy adaptations or its streaming home, Netflix, The School For Good and Evil provides enough intriguing, entertaining, and otherwise satisfying elements to give it a fighting chance in a crowded genre. Its impressive supporting cast delivers some of the film’s best moments, but don’t be surprised if its extended running time makes you eager to hear the school’s dismissal bell.

Directed by Paul Feig, The School For Good and Evil premieres October 19 on Netflix.

The School for Good and Evil (2022)
The School for Good and Evil
146m
Genre Fantasy, Action, Drama
Stars Sophia Anne Caruso, Sofia Wylie, Laurence Fishburne
Directed by Paul Feig

Editors' Recommendations

Movie images and data from:
The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power review: perfection, precious
An elven tower stands over Middle-earth in a scene from The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power.

Few streaming series have carried as much weight into their premiere as The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power, Amazon Studios' ambitious, ludicrously expensive series set in the world of J.R.R. Tolkien's Middle-earth saga. Not only is the Prime Video series telling a new story set in one of the fantasy genre's most seminal -- and as such, highly scrutinized -- worlds, but its success (or failure) could very well determine the fate of an entire streaming service.

That's a lot to put on any show, so it's probably a good thing that the first two episodes of The Rings of Power deliver on all of the project's potential (and then some).

Read more
The Invitation review: All bark, no bite
Nathalie Emmanuel wears a bloodied white dress in The Invitation.

The Invitation wears its influences on its sleeve. The film’s moody, effectively spooky opening prologue, which throws viewers headfirst into the deserted halls of a creepy British mansion on one fateful night, feels like something that could have been ripped right out of a Guillermo del Toro film. Its premise, meanwhile, feels so strikingly similar to that of 2019’s Ready or Not that the YouTube page for The Invitation’s spoilerific first trailer is filled with comments comparing the two films.

In a sense, there’s something endearing about how obviously indebted The Invitation is to filmmakers like del Toro and modern horror thrillers like Ready or Not. But The Invitation also makes a classic mistake. It is, after all, commonly understood that acknowledging one’s influences is only a good idea if you’re capable of delivering something that still feels new and fresh. The Invitation doesn’t manage to do either. Instead, the ambitious, overlong new film packs neither the bite nor the thrills present in so many of its genre predecessors.

Read more
Three Thousand Years of Longing review: George Miller takes a left turn off Fury Road
Idris Elba pleads with Tilda Swinton.

To what magic lamp, monkey’s paw, or wishing well does George Miller owe his career of improbable dream projects? On and off for decades, this Aussie writer-director and demolition derby-ist has wrangled bountiful resources in pursuit of offbeat glory, splurging top studio dollar on dubiously “family-friendly” menageries and increasingly elaborate dystopias. The pinnacle of his talent for turning a multiplex investment into a madman’s sandbox is, of course, his last movie, the staggering Mad Max: Fury Road, which was essentially a vision of what summer movies can be when made by real artists left to their own lunatic devices. What an impossible movie it was — and a tough act to follow, too.

So how has Miller followed his exhilarating epic of dirt, dust, fire, speed, and mayhem? As it turns out, with a change of pace. His new movie, Three Thousand Years of Longing, is at once vaster and more compact than his last one, trading an endless stretch of desert for a hotel room; a few days of action for a story that literally spans millennia; and a nonstop barrage of vehicular carnage for extended scenes of two characters in bathrobes, politely discussing the true nature of desire over tea and chickpea treats. And yet here, too, is an impossible movie — a strange and bewitching fairy tale for adults, unfashionable in its cerebral whimsy and mid-budget wizardry. You could say that the success of Fury Road paid for this more idiosyncratic fantasy, but that would be akin to arguing that Miller sold a unicorn to buy a leprechaun.

Read more