Skip to main content

Why Michael Keaton is the best Batman ever

The biggest compliment I can give Michael Keaton is that he single-handedly saves The Flash from being the mediocre train wreck it would be without his presence. Keaton steps back into Batman’s boots with surprising and confident ease, playing a natural progression to the character he last played in Tim Burton’s masterful 1992 sequel, Batman Returns. In fact, it seems like no time has passed since the last time we saw him as Batman.

Keaton wasn’t the first actor to play Batman — that honor goes to Lewis G. Wilson, who played the Caped Crusader in the 1945 Columbia Pictures serial. However, Keaton is by far the best live-action version of Batman, mainly because he understands he is playing two characters at once. And while other worthy actors have donned the cape and cowl – Val Kilmer, Christian Bale, and most recently, Robert Pattinson –  none have matched Keaton’s unique ability to make Batman seem real.

What makes Keaton special?

Batman pointing one of his gadgets at someone in Batman Returns
Warner Bros, 1992 / Warner Bros.

Keaton’s performance is so great and unique because we can’t talk about his Batman without also acknowledging his Bruce Wayne. While most other Batman actors seem to focus solely on the Bat while neglecting the man, Keaton’s approach is even and fair: he knows that Bruce is as crucial to the story as Batman.

The idea that “Bruce is the mask” is not new, but it entered the mainstream following Christopher Nolan’s hyperrealistic take on the Caped Crusader. Nolan and Christian Bale treated Bruce like a nuisance, an unwanted presence meant to distract from the “real” gravitas of Batman. Similarly, the director/actor duos of Zack Snyder/Ben Affleck and Matt Reeves/Robert Pattinson kept this vision, operating under the perception that Batman is where the character thrives. However, projects like Batman:Mask of the Phantasm –– arguably the best Batman movie ever — confirm that Bruce is just as compelling and necessary to tell the story, and sidelining him results in an uneven and unfaithful depiction of DC’s greatest hero.

What Keaton does so wonderfully is make Bruce as prominent as Batman. His portrayal in Burton’s movies is cheeky, charming, and self-assured, attractive enough to command your attention, yet distant enough to prevent you from getting overly familiar. Keaton’s genius relies on playing a fake version of Bruce — the one he puts up for the cameras — while still embodying his struggles, insecurities, traumas, and desires. He plays Bruce playing a version of Bruce. It’s a stroke of genius on his part and the main reason why he is the best actor to play Batman.

The Bat in action

Michael Keaton as Batman with his mask off in The Flash.
Warner Bros.

Burton’s Batman had a severe thing going against him: his suit was wildly impractical. Thus, Keaton’s Batman was ridiculously stiff, fighting against Gotham’s bad guys with the flexibility of a cement log. And while one could excuse it as a quirk of a 1980s Batman adaptation, it was an issue that worked against Keaton’s version of the character.

Luckily, The Flash fixes this problem. Keaton’s Batman is now dynamic and agile, fighting with his safe, stiff style, but showing far more range of motion than his notoriously restrictive suit allowed him in the Burton movies. He still walks and moves rather robotically, but at least he can now turn his head — progress! Unluckily, The Flash offers a less-than-stellar portrayal of Batman, painting him as a bad strategist and lackluster hero. Both versions, Keaton and Affleck, are done dirty by the film’s unfocused plot and uneven tone, and if Batman comes out unscathed, it’s entirely because of Keaton’s committed performance – Affleck is barely there, but he plays a buffoonish version of the character before disappearing, quite literally.

"I'm Batman" Scene - Batman (1989) Movie CLIP HD

Still, Keaton, ever the consummate pro, protects Batman from The Flash‘s stupidity through sheer willpower. I think you can really tell adifference with old-school actors — those who approach a character with respect for their craft, rather than with some wish-fulfilling desire to be a hero or a shameless attempt to bulk up their résumés with franchise material. Keaton isn’t phoning it in as Batman; he gives it his all, even during the sillier scenes. He isn’t there to collect a paycheck, but rather to play a role, and he plays it well.

If anything, The Flash should be proof enough that Keaton remains undefeated as Batman and Bruce Wayne. James Gunn’s DCU is supposedly making a Batman/Damian Wayne project, The Brave and the Bold, but considering Keaton remains flawless as the World’s Greatest Detective, why not make the project fans have wanted for years: a live-action Batman Beyond project with Keaton as Bruce Wayne? Throw in Michelle Pfeiffer, who absolutely deserves to return as Catwoman, and you have an irresistible project that would be more exciting than anything DC has come up with for the past 10 years or so. But one thing’s for sure: Keaton deserves to return as Batman because he is the best actor for the role. Bale, Affleck, Pattinson — they’re all fine in playing certain aspects of the role. But if you want a fully developed and comprehensive take on Batman, you call Michael Keaton. The best part is he’ll always answer.

The Flash is now playing in theaters. Batman and Batman Returns are currently streaming on Max.

Editors' Recommendations

David Caballero
Freelance Writer
David is a Mexican freelance writer with a deep appreciation for words. After three years in the cold world of Marketing…
Batgirl should have been released instead of The Flash. Here’s why
Leslie Grace as Batgirl poses in Batgirl.

It seemed both inevitable and surprising at the same time when news of The Flash bombing at the box office began to circulate on the Iinternet earlier this week. Plagued by numerous development hiccups, departing directors, a lead star engaging in erratic and criminal behavior, and a relentless and increasingly desperate marketing campaign, the movie failed to ignite the imagination of the mass audience it needed to have in order to succeed.

It's still up for debate as to why WB was so adamant about standing by this misbegotten project and why it was so eager to shelve Batgirl, a nearly completed movie that starred Leslie Grace as the titular heroine and, like The Flash, brought back Michael Keaton's Batman. Directed by Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah, who had a commercial hit with Bad Boys For Life and a critical hit with the Ms. Marvel MCU series, Batgirl had all the ingredients needed for a breakout hit: a rising young star, a veteran returning to an iconic role, a supporting cast that included a recent Oscar winner, and a modest budget that allowed more room for a satisfying return on investment.

Read more
The Flash may have just killed the DC brand. Does it deserve a second chance?
Barry Allen in the Flash suit looking to the distance in The Flash.

I think it's not an overstatement to say the DCEU is dead -- and that The Flash killed it. To be fair, the DCEU was always meant to die, and The Flash was always meant to kill it. However, Andy Muschietti's long-awaited, troubled, now-infamous film might have also killed the DC brand as a whole, which was decidedly not in the plans. That's because The Flash is terrible, the sort of film deprived of any ounce of artistic integrity, one that's meant to be consumed rather than enjoyed, witnessed rather than appreciated.

The Flash is a Frankenstein's monster of a movie that went through so many hands and has so many different ideas that it doesn't even have an identity. In a sea of franchises and IP films, The Flash is the most unoriginal, uninspired, vapid, and basic effort. It recycles the most effective joke from Justice League, rips off the most famous sequence from X-Men: Days of Future Past, and fails to provide a refreshing take on the Multiverse to differentiate itself from the MCU or even The CW. The Flash is a cheap and desperate attempt at nostalgia and the final nail in the DC coffin that not even Tom Cruise, Stephen King, and James Gunn could save. But The Flash was never going to be saved because it was never made to showcase its central character. It was always a tool meant to course-correct a dying franchise.

Read more
Which multiverse is better: Marvel or DC?
Three Spider-Men point at each other in Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse.

With The Flash finally in theaters and Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse still dominating multiplexes nationwide, it's safe to claim that we're in an era of multiverses. Everything from high-quality animated entertainment to Oscar heavyweights like Everything Everywhere All at Once now embrace the concept, and that's thanks in no small part to two of the biggest franchises in the world right now. Marvel and DC have both recently taken the plunge into the world of multiversal storytelling, which makes this a perfect time to consider which multiverse is ultimately the more fruitful terrain to explore.

Although the idea of multiverses is quite new to the filmed versions of these stories, the idea of parallel universes has existed in the comics for decades. Over those years, both universes have had their share of cataclysmic multiverse events, but only one universe can ultimately reign supreme over this particular corner of comic book lore. With all that in mind, let's dive in and figure out which multiverse is actually better and why.
Universe diversity: DC

Read more