Skip to main content

The Flash’s ending, explained

Two versions of Barry Allen stand in the Batcave with Supergirl in The Flash.
Warner Bros. Pictures

Warning: This article contains major spoilers for The Flash (2023).

The Flash revolves entirely around one decision. The film is sent hurtling into its second act when its lead, Barry Allen (Ezra Miller), decides to travel back in time and stop his mother’s death from ever happening. In doing so, Barry creates a world where Bruce Wayne is played by Michael Keaton instead of Ben Affleck, Supergirl (Sasha Calle) made it to Earth instead of her cousin, Kal-El (Henry Cavill), Arthur Curry (Jason Momoa) was never born, and a version of Barry himself got to grow up with knowing what it was like to live without his parents.

Recommended Videos

While Barry tries desperately to make this new reality work, his actions ultimately lead to him, his younger self, Calle’s Supergirl, and Keaton’s older Batman being Earth’s only line of defense against General Zod (Michael Shannon) and his army of evil Kryptonians. Without Henry Cavill’s Clark Kent around to beat Zod, Barry begins to realize that the world he’s created with his time-traveling actions is destined to be terraformed and destroyed.

The Flash’s third act climax, consequently, sees both Barry and his younger self repeatedly try and fail to prevent Zod’s forces from killing Supergirl and Batman. When Barry finally accepts that he has to let his mother die in order to prevent total chaos, he ends up in a standoff in the Speed Force with not only his brasher, younger self but also a future version of himself who refuses to let anyone he loves die. Standing there, Barry is forced to try and convince his two alternate selves that they have to let go of their mother’s life if they want to save the world.

Two Flashes stand on a battlefield with Supergirl in The Flash.
Warner Bros. Pictures

It’s at this moment that The Flash throws out a series of badly-realized CGI cameos. While standing in the dimensional center of their universe, the film’s three versions of The Flash all watch as multiple different timelines begin crashing into each other. Director Andy Muschietti briefly takes viewers into each of these crumbling universes, which include the world seen in Richard Donner’s Christopher Reeve-led Superman films, the version of reality featured in the Adam West-starring Batman TV series, and a timeline that is protected by a version of Superman played by Nicolas Cage.

All of these actors and characters, including Reeves’ Superman, Cage’s Superman, and Helen Slater’s Supergirl, are brought to “life” using the kind of de-aging and deepfake effects that have become increasingly popular. Whether or not these “cameos” are considered successful may vary from viewer to viewer, but The Flash thankfully doesn’t dwell too long on its third-act references. After flashing through each of its alternate realities, the film turns its attention back to its three central variants just in time to show Barry Allen’s younger self sacrificing his life in order to save his older, wiser self.

His sacrifice results in the destruction of his and Barry’s evil, time-traveling variant, which clears the way for Miller’s original version of The Flash to travel back in time and undo his actions from earlier in the film. While doing so, he gives himself a chance to say goodbye to his mother and finds a seemingly harmless way to clear his imprisoned father’s name in the present. When he then returns to his original timeline, Barry makes it to his father’s appeal hearing just in time to see his innocence finally proven in front of a judge.

As he’s in the midst of celebrating his victory outside the courthouse moments later, though, The Flash finds time for one more shocking cameo from none other than Batman & Robin star George Clooney. The film then cuts to black on an image of its eponymous hero trying — and failing — to hide his confusion over the appearance of yet another Bruce Wayne he’s never seen before.

George Clooney smirks as Bruce Wayne in Batman & Robin.
Warner Bros. Pictures

The Flash doesn’t go too far out of its way to explain its last twist, which is mostly played for laughs. It’s unclear if the film’s final erasure of Ben Affleck’s Batman from Barry’s universe is permanent or something he can undo without having to reverse his father’s exoneration. Either way, The Flash doesn’t seem all that concerned with explaining itself in its final moments, and it’s not hard to see why. As one of the last entries in Warner Bros.’ now-abandoned Snyderverse, The Flash doesn’t have much of a responsibility to end on a concrete note.

On the contrary, all that The Flash really has to do is help send the Snyderverse out in style. It doesn’t totally succeed at doing that, but not for a lack of trying. In the end, the film’s reintroduction of all of Warner Bros.’ past DC franchises as different realities that still exist in the same multiverse not only cements the Snyderverse’s place in DC history but also begins the failed franchise’s now-inevitable abandonment.

Before long, the Snyderverse will be nothing more than just another one of the past worlds featured in The Flash. With that in mind, The Flash’s final image of Barry Allen smiling as one of his teeth falls out feels like an oddly fitting last shot for a film that had the rug pulled out from under it long before it had the chance to build any momentum.

The Flash is now playing in theaters.

Alex Welch
Alex is a writer and critic who has been writing about and reviewing movies and TV at Digital Trends since 2022. He was…
The 10 most underrated movies of 2023, ranked
Ghostface brandishes a knife in a still from Scream VI

Scream VI Paramount Pictures / Paramount Pictures

When we talk about a movie being “underrated,” what do we really mean? It’s essentially as nebulous a distinction as “overrated.” Sometimes a film earns great reviews, but no one sees it. Other times a populist hit doesn’t get enough respect for a particular cinephile’s taste. Can a movie be underrated and overrated? Plenty would argue that’s the fate of Avatar, the biggest box-office smash of all time and also an easy target whose ultimate cultural impact is constantly being questioned. Perhaps “underrated,” like “best,” is all in the eye of the beholder.

Read more
You probably missed this underrated 2010 action movie. Here’s why you should watch it
A man looks out of a train window in Unstoppable.

In 2020, Quentin Tarantino revealed his top choices for the best films of the 2010s. Coming in at number one was David Fincher's The Social Network (via Premiere), with Christopher Nolan's Dunkirk in second. Considering those films combined to win six Oscars, their inclusion on the list made sense. Tarantino surprised many when he selected Unstoppable, Tony Scott's 2010 thriller starring Denzel Washington and Chris Pine, as the final film in his best of the 2010s list on an episode of The Rewatchables.

Based on the real-life CSX 8888 incident, Unstoppable follows veteran engineer Frank Barnes (The Equalizer 3's Washington) and new conductor Will Colson (The Contractor's Pine), two railroad workers tasked with stopping a train carrying toxic chemicals. Upon first watch, Unstoppable is a perfectly good film from a master in the action genre. But as you rewatch the film, you start to understand and agree with Tarantino. Unstoppable is a great film, thanks to the innate chemistry between the two leads and Scott's terrific direction.
The 1-2 punch of Denzel Washington and Chris Pine

Read more
Forget Die Hard; this 1980s action film is the most underrated Christmas movie ever
A man aims his gun in Lethal Weapon.

Warning: This article discusses suicide.
The campaign to canonize Die Hard as a Christmas movie has been in full swing for year now, with adherents advocating for the movie’s holiday bona fides with almost religious zealotry. But while some have made compelling arguments – even the movie’s distributor, 20th Century Fox, called it the “greatest Christmas story ever told” – it’s not hard to see why others, including star Bruce Willis, consider it a shaky claim.
Yes, it’s set during Christmastime. And yes, there’s the glorious sequence in which Beethoven’s Ode to Joy plays as the villains help themselves to $640 million in early holiday loot. (The director, John McTiernan wanted to use Ode to Joy because he had liked it in that heartwarming holiday classic A Clockwork Orange.) But while Christmastime is an effective setting, there’s just not a ton of evidence that the movie is Christmas-themed. Die Hard 2 (which I’ve always preferred to the original anyway) is set during the holidays in Washington, D.C., and boasts something far more Christmassy than the LA-set original: snow.
Which isn’t to say that Christmas movies can’t be set in LA. There's an argument that Lethal Weapon, released the summer before Die Hard (Joel Silver produced both movies), more intentionally embodies classic holiday themes. Here are some reasons why it belongs in the canon of Christmas classics as much -- or more than -- Die Hard.

Just a lonely Christmas

Read more